Method Evaluation Study of Truview Picture Capture Device(PCD) Versus MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT ID: NCT01530152
Last Updated: 2012-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ (Picture Capture Device) laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation.
The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade.
A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Hypothesis:
The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope provides a better view of the vocal cords and thereby makes the intubation les difficult.
CL 1 is achieved in 90 percent of intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope, and the hypothesis of the study is that CL 1 can be increased to 98 percent by use of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pediatric Intubation
NCT02289872
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555
Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy, Truview EVO2 and Glidescope in Pediatric Patients
NCT01023568
A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients
NCT00803751
Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years
NCT02069444
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A difficult intubation occurs in approx. 1.2 - 3.8 percent of all anaesthesias .
The standard procedure of intubation in Denmark is to use the curved Macintosh blade. This method, however, has some limits, as it requires a direct view of the area of the vocal cords. For that reason we are looking for new methods of intubation that can give a better overview.
The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope is a commercially available laryngoscope with an integrated optical lens that can be connected to a camera head, and gives a better view of trachea during intubation under a general anaestetic. Furthermore it is possible to connect 8-10 liters of oxygen per minute to the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope, which will prevent fog on the viewtube and slow down the rate of desaturation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Truwiev PCD laryngoscope
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation.
The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade. (See figure 1.) A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who understand and accept the trial information.
* SARI score 2-5.
Exclusion Criteria
* A need for acute initiation. (By acute initiation the endotracheal tube will be placed in trachea during the first laryngoscopy without prior spraying with local anesthesia).
* If unexpected difficulties during the initiating anesthesia arise, the trial will be interrupted, and the patient will be treated according to the department's guidelines for the situation
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aalborg University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Per Henrik Lambert
Senior doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Per Henrik Lambert
Aalborg, Ålborg, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCT-20110006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.