Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Methods for Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients
NCT ID: NCT01528098
Last Updated: 2012-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-03-31
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Low Volume PEG-Asc and Lower Volume PEG-Asc With Bisacodyl
NCT02980562
Effectiveness of Bisacodyl Suppository Agent for Dose Reduction of Low Dose PEG
NCT03849196
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
NCT01685970
Efficacy of 2-Liter Mixed Preparation With Bisacodyl Plus Polyethylene Glycol and 4-Liter Polyethylene Glycol for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Prior History of Colorectal Resection
NCT01887158
Evaluation of Reduced-volume PEG Bowel Preparation Administered the Same Day of Colonoscopy
NCT01533090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEG plus bisacodyl
Those who taken PEG 4L + bisacodyl 10mg
No interventions assigned to this group
PEG 4L
Those who taken PEG 4L alone
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* major psychiatric illness
* known allergy to PEG
* serious condition- severe cardiac, renal, or metabolic diseases
* partial colon resection
* current acute exacerbation of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
* functional constipation defined by Rome III diagnostic criteria
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Soon Chun Hyang University
OTHER
Kyunghee University
OTHER
Hanyang University
OTHER
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dong Il Park, M.D, Ph.D.
Associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dong Il Park, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEGPD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.