Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Methods for Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients

NCT ID: NCT01528098

Last Updated: 2012-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two regimens of polyethylene glycol(PEG) plus bisacodyl versus PEG alone for bowel preparation in hospitalized patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inadequate bowel preparation may lead to a longer colonoscopy, and to an inability to identify lesions. PEG can provide a rapid orthograde peroral approach to colonic lavage without producing significant fluid or electrolyte changes. Thus PEG is now commonly used for bowel preparation. However, large amounts and unsatisfactory taste of PEG solution are generally poorly tolerated, especially in hospitalized patients who had comorbidity and restricted ambulation. Recently, a new PEG-based bowel cleansing agents became available. It combines PEG with a high dose of ascorbic acid or bisacodyl. Although many studies reported the efficacy of these combined solution for colonoscopy, but efficacy in hospitalized patients was under-recognized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intestine; Complaints

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEG plus bisacodyl

Those who taken PEG 4L + bisacodyl 10mg

No interventions assigned to this group

PEG 4L

Those who taken PEG 4L alone

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hospitalized patients for colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* age under 20 years or over 80 years
* major psychiatric illness
* known allergy to PEG
* serious condition- severe cardiac, renal, or metabolic diseases
* partial colon resection
* current acute exacerbation of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
* functional constipation defined by Rome III diagnostic criteria
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Soon Chun Hyang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kyunghee University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hanyang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dong Il Park, M.D, Ph.D.

Associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dong Il Park, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dong Il Park, professor

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2001-2059

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEGPD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.