Trial Outcomes & Findings for Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs. Abdominal Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer (NCT NCT01526655)

NCT ID: NCT01526655

Last Updated: 2024-04-18

Results Overview

Quality of life measured by means of the EuroQol form (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D form was completed daily during the first eight days after surgery, then once weekly for additional six weeks. The health state index has a possible range from 0 to 1 with a higher score meaning a better quality of life.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

50 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42

Results posted on

2024-04-18

Participant Flow

One patient withdrew consent prior to surgery in the control group (abdominal hysterectomy) and received the standard treatment.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Overall Study
STARTED
25
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
25
24
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy Robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision Abdominal total hysterectomy: Abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Body mass index
BMI 25-29.9
8 Participants
n=25 Participants
10 Participants
n=25 Participants
18 Participants
n=50 Participants
Body mass index
BMI 30-35
6 Participants
n=25 Participants
5 Participants
n=25 Participants
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
Body mass index
BMI > 35
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
2 Participants
n=25 Participants
6 Participants
n=50 Participants
Parity
2 births
n=25 Participants
2 births
n=25 Participants
2 births
n=50 Participants
Smokers
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
0 Participants
n=25 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
Previous laparotomy
13 Participants
n=25 Participants
8 Participants
n=25 Participants
21 Participants
n=50 Participants
Comorbidity
Cardiovascular disease
10 Participants
n=25 Participants
11 Participants
n=25 Participants
21 Participants
n=50 Participants
Comorbidity
Pulmonary disease
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
6 Participants
n=50 Participants
Comorbidity
Diabetes mellitus
0 Participants
n=25 Participants
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
Comorbidity
Previous breast cancer
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
6 Participants
n=50 Participants
Current medication
Antidepressant/sedative
2 Participants
n=25 Participants
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
5 Participants
n=50 Participants
Current medication
Analgesics
5 Participants
n=25 Participants
2 Participants
n=25 Participants
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class I
9 Participants
n=25 Participants
11 Participants
n=25 Participants
20 Participants
n=50 Participants
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class II
15 Participants
n=25 Participants
13 Participants
n=25 Participants
28 Participants
n=50 Participants
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class III
1 Participants
n=25 Participants
1 Participants
n=25 Participants
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
EQ-5D health index preoperatively (EuroQol Group form five dimensions)
0.81 score on a scale
n=25 Participants
0.82 score on a scale
n=25 Participants
0.81 score on a scale
n=50 Participants
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
No anxiety
13 Participants
n=25 Participants
15 Participants
n=25 Participants
28 Participants
n=50 Participants
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Mild-moderate anxiety
9 Participants
n=25 Participants
6 Participants
n=25 Participants
15 Participants
n=50 Participants
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Severe anxiety
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
HADS Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
No depression
21 Participants
n=25 Participants
21 Participants
n=25 Participants
42 Participants
n=50 Participants
HADS Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Mild-moderate depression
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
8 Participants
n=50 Participants
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ total score (range 0-10)
2.9 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
3.3 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
3.1 score on a scale (0-10)
n=50 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
25 Participants
n=25 Participants
25 Participants
n=25 Participants
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
25 Participants
n=25 Participants
25 Participants
n=25 Participants
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
Body mass index
28.2 kg/m^2
n=25 Participants
28.0 kg/m^2
n=25 Participants
28.1 kg/m^2
n=50 Participants
Body mass index
BMI <25
7 Participants
n=25 Participants
8 Participants
n=25 Participants
15 Participants
n=50 Participants
Age, Continuous
68 years
n=25 Participants
67 years
n=25 Participants
67 years
n=50 Participants
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ minor score (range 0-10)
2.1 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
2.3 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
2.3 score on a scale (0-10)
n=50 Participants
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ moderate score(range 0-10)
4.4 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
4.4 score on a scale (0-10)
n=25 Participants
4.4 score on a scale (0-10)
n=50 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Quality of life measured by means of the EuroQol form (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D form was completed daily during the first eight days after surgery, then once weekly for additional six weeks. The health state index has a possible range from 0 to 1 with a higher score meaning a better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 2
0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 3
0.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 4
0.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 5
0.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
0.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 0
0.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 1
0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
0.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 6
0.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 7
0.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 14
0.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 21
0.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 28
0.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 35
0.93 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EQ-5D Day 42
0.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 2
2.7 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.6
4.7 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.4
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 3
2.3 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.3
3.5 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.7
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 4
29.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.4
52.3 mg/L
Standard Deviation 27.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 5
46.3 mg/L
Standard Deviation 49.8
75.4 mg/L
Standard Deviation 43.7
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 6
10.5 mg/L
Standard Deviation 8.6
9.3 mg/L
Standard Deviation 8.6
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 7
2.9 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.6
1.9 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.5
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
hsCRP time 1
2.5 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
6.0 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 1
6.7 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 1.7
7.7 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 2
6.2 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 1.7
6.6 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 1.7
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 3
6.8 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 3.0
11.4 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 3.7
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 4
9.4 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 3.3
10.1 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.8
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 5
7.2 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.3
9.2 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.3
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 6
7.2 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.0
7.6 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 2.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))
WBC time 7
6.5 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 1.5
6.8 x10^9 cells/L
Standard Deviation 1.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 1
15.0 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 29.8
10.9 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 19.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 2
15.7 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 29.0
9.6 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 13.8
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 3
21.0 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 28.7
47.6 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 24.5
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 4
28.0 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 31.0
37.9 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 19.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 5
15.3 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 21.8
17.3 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 9.4
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 6
18.4 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 31.2
10.0 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 12.1
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))
IL-6 time 7
13.1 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 25.7
12.2 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 28.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 1
1.8 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.6 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.1
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 2
1.9 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.6 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 3
1.5 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 0.9
2.5 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 4
3.3 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 2.5
6.2 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 4.9
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 5
3.0 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 2.4
4.5 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 6
1.0 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.9 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 0.6
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))
CK time 7
1.6 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.3 µkat/L
Standard Deviation 0.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 1
273.4 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 75.0
266.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 123.2
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 2
489.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 137.0
510.1 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 131.2
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 3
301.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 267.0
533.2 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 249.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 4
392.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 201.0
383.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 178.1
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 5
358.1 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 128.0
379.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 125.4
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 6
309.1 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 98.0
331.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 76.0
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)
Cortisol time 7
307.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 129.0
331.1 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 125.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.

Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Health Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Direct costs per procedure
65,728 Swedish crowns per procedure
46,776 Swedish crowns per procedure
Health Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Indirect costs per procedure
12,451 Swedish crowns per procedure
18,318 Swedish crowns per procedure
Health Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure
78,179 Swedish crowns per procedure
65,094 Swedish crowns per procedure

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.

Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 Participants
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 Participants
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Health Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Direct costs per procedure
61,862 Swedish crowns per procedure
46,769 Swedish crowns per procedure
Health Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Indirect costs per procedure
12,451 Swedish crowns per procedure
18,318 Swedish crowns per procedure
Health Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)
Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure
74,313 Swedish crowns per procedure
65,087 Swedish crowns per procedure

Adverse Events

Robotic Hysterectomy

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Abdominal Hysterectomy

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 participants at risk
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 participants at risk
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Reoperation vaginal vault bleeding
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bladder injury
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Robotic Hysterectomy
n=25 participants at risk
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Abdominal Hysterectomy
n=24 participants at risk
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
Infections and infestations
Wound complications
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
25.0%
6/24 • Number of events 6 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
20.0%
5/25 • Number of events 5 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
12.5%
3/24 • Number of events 3 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Vaginal vault hematoma
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Red blood cell transfusion
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal punction not possible
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
Surgical and medical procedures
Intubation difficulties
0.00%
0/25 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From the day of surgery until six weeks postoperatively.

Additional Information

Professor Dr. Preben Kjölhede

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköpings universitet (LIU), Sweden

Phone: +4638231188

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place