KatGuide Method Versus Conventional Method at Insertion of Chest Tube
NCT ID: NCT01522885
Last Updated: 2014-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
109 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Evaluation of 14F Thal Tube vs 28 French Chest Tube for Hemothorax and Use of Maximum Barrier Precautions
NCT03167723
Comparing 14 F Pigtail Catheter to Traditional 28-32F Chest Tube in the Management of Traumatic Hemothorax and Hemopneumothorax
NCT02553434
Pigtail Catheter Versus Chest Tube in the Management of Traumatic Pneumothorax
NCT01537289
Drainage of Traumatic Hemothorax and Pneumothorax: Small Bore Versus Large Bore Chest Drain
NCT02344524
Multi-center:The Small (14F) Percutaneous Catheter vs. Large (28-40F) Open Chest Tube for Traumatic Hemothorax (P-CAT)
NCT03546764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
KatGuide
Chest tube insertion is performed by using the KatGuide
KatGuide versus conventional method (forceps)
According to randomization Chest tubes are placed in the pleural cavity by using the KatGuide device.
Conventional group
Chest tubes are inserted by using conventional method (forceps) for large bore chest tube insertion.
Chest tube insertion
The chest tube is placed in the pleural cavity by using a forceps (conventional method) or KatGuide
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
KatGuide versus conventional method (forceps)
According to randomization Chest tubes are placed in the pleural cavity by using the KatGuide device.
Chest tube insertion
The chest tube is placed in the pleural cavity by using a forceps (conventional method) or KatGuide
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for upper or lower placement of a single chest tube in the pleural cavity
* 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who can not give written or verbal consent to participate
* If there is no time or possibility to inform the patient
* Patients who already has a large bore chest tube
* Patients with long lasting (\>14 days) or chronic chest tube
* Patients with both fluid and air in the pleural cavity
* Patients where "the safe area" (front axillary fold, IC 4-5) can not be used for chest tube insertion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Niels Katballe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Niels Katballe
Coordinating investigator, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Niels Katballe, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Niels Katballe
Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark
Vytautas Nekrasas
Aalborg, Denmark, Denmark
Niels Katballe
Aarhus N, Denmark, Denmark
Peter B Licht
Odense, Denmark, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Katballe N, Moeller LB, Olesen WH, Litzer MM, Andersen G, Nekrasas V, Licht PB, Bach P, Pilegaard HK. A Novel Device for Accurate Chest Tube Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011375
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.