Short Term Intensified Chemo-immunotherapy in HIV-positive Patients With Burkitt Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01516593

Last Updated: 2022-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter,open-label trial to evaluate activity and safety of the investigational intensive in HIV+ patients with Burkitt's lymphoma.

Experimental treatment consists of an induction phase followed by a consolidation or intensified phase according to tumor response.

Until recently, the immuno-compromised state of patients with concomitant HIV/AIDS and BL was thought to limit the ability to administer intensive chemotherapeutic regimens due to infection rate. However, the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and evidence in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas that HIV-positive patients can tolerate standard chemotherapeutic regimens with improved outcomes have led investigators to treat HIV-positive patients with the same intensive chemotherapy regimens used to treat immuno-competent patients. Data suggest that these current approaches, along with supportive care, may result in improved patient outcomes, similar to those in the immuno-competent patient population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The activity of feasibility of the proposed program will be assessed in HIV+ patients with Burkitt lymphoma with the aim to improve tolerability, minimize source consuming and supporting treatment and redu ce late sequels. Available combinations in this setting are really source demanding and toxic combinations showing high rates of septic complication and a treatment-related mortality of near 20%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Burkitt's Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intensive short term immuno-chemotherapy

Experimental treatment consists of an induction phase followed by a consolidation or intensified phase according to tumor response.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Induction Phase

Intervention Type DRUG

* dd -2 to 1: Methylprednisolone
* dd 0-1, Cyclophosphamide, associated on day 0 with Vincristine
* dd 2, Rituximab
* dd 7, Methotrexate
* dd 14, Rituximab
* dd 15, Etoposide
* dd 21, Methotrexate
* dd 29, Rituximab and Doxorubicin
* dd 36, Rituximab and VCR

At the end of this induction phase, subsequent treatment will be performed according to the objective response:

1. pts in CR: consolidation phase followed by bulky site irradiation
2. pts in PR: consolidation phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation
3. pts with SD after induction or PD during or after induction: intensification phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation

Consolidation Phase (on day +50)

Intervention Type DRUG

* dd 1-2: cytarabine twice a day
* dd 3 and 11: rituximab
* dd 11-13: leukapheresis for PBPC collection.

Intensification phase

Intervention Type DRUG

1. One or two courses of R-IVAC or R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen, every three weeks as debulking.
2. CTX (dd 1) associated with rituximab on dd 3 and 10, followed by PBPC collection (dd 11-13);
3. AraC every 12 hours for four days (dd -5 to -2) supported by reinfusion of CD34+ cells (dd 0), rituximab infusion (dd -1 and +11) and second in-vivo purged PBPC collection (if needed).

BEAM conditioning

Intervention Type DRUG

BCNU on dd 1; VP-16 every 12 hours on dd 2-5 and araC every 12 hours on dd 2-5; melphalan on dd 6, followed by the reinfusion of CD34+ cells

Consolidation radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

At the end of the whole program, patients will be evaluated for involved-field irradiation with 6-10 MeV photons and a dose of 36 Gy (2 Gy/d, five fractions a week). Three subgroups of patients will be considered for radiotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Induction Phase

* dd -2 to 1: Methylprednisolone
* dd 0-1, Cyclophosphamide, associated on day 0 with Vincristine
* dd 2, Rituximab
* dd 7, Methotrexate
* dd 14, Rituximab
* dd 15, Etoposide
* dd 21, Methotrexate
* dd 29, Rituximab and Doxorubicin
* dd 36, Rituximab and VCR

At the end of this induction phase, subsequent treatment will be performed according to the objective response:

1. pts in CR: consolidation phase followed by bulky site irradiation
2. pts in PR: consolidation phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation
3. pts with SD after induction or PD during or after induction: intensification phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation

Intervention Type DRUG

Consolidation Phase (on day +50)

* dd 1-2: cytarabine twice a day
* dd 3 and 11: rituximab
* dd 11-13: leukapheresis for PBPC collection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intensification phase

1. One or two courses of R-IVAC or R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen, every three weeks as debulking.
2. CTX (dd 1) associated with rituximab on dd 3 and 10, followed by PBPC collection (dd 11-13);
3. AraC every 12 hours for four days (dd -5 to -2) supported by reinfusion of CD34+ cells (dd 0), rituximab infusion (dd -1 and +11) and second in-vivo purged PBPC collection (if needed).

Intervention Type DRUG

BEAM conditioning

BCNU on dd 1; VP-16 every 12 hours on dd 2-5 and araC every 12 hours on dd 2-5; melphalan on dd 6, followed by the reinfusion of CD34+ cells

Intervention Type DRUG

Consolidation radiotherapy

At the end of the whole program, patients will be evaluated for involved-field irradiation with 6-10 MeV photons and a dose of 36 Gy (2 Gy/d, five fractions a week). Three subgroups of patients will be considered for radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Short-term intensive sequential chemoimmunotherapy high-dose cytarabine; consolidation phase unresponsive patients, refractory disease Conditioning regimen, autologous transplantation bulky irradiation; residual lesion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologic diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma (WHO 2008)
* HIV sero-positivity
* Age ≥18 and ≤60 years
* ECOG-PS ≤3

Exclusion Criteria

* CNS parenchymal involvement
* Absolute neutrophil count \<1.000 cells/μL and platelets count \<75 × 109/L (Burkitt unrelated)
* Creatinine \>1,5N (Burkitt unrelated)
* SGOT and/or SGTP \>2,5N (Burkitt unrelated)
* Bilirubin \>2N (Burkitt unrelated)
* Severe psychiatric illness or any other clinical, social or psychological condition that could interfere with patient's adherence and compliance
* Significant cardiac disease or acute myocardial infarction in the last 12 months
* Severe active infection (except for HBV and/or HCV co-infection)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Andres J. M. Ferreri

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andres J. M. Ferreri

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrés JM Ferreri, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oncologia Medica A - Centro di Riferimento Oncologico

Aviano (PN), , Italy

Site Status

Ematologia - A.O. Spedali Civili

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Dip. Oncoematologia - Fondazione Centro San Raffaele del Monte Tabor

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

S.C. Oncologia Medica - Ospedale San Paolo

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

S.C. Oncologia Medica 3 - IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT)

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

U.O.C. Immunodeficienze virali - I.N.M.I. L. Spallanzani

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

S.C. Oncoematologia - A.O. Santa Maria

Terni, , Italy

Site Status

U.O. Ematologia 2 - Ospedale San Giovanni Battista

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CARMEN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Immunotherapy in Lymphoma
NCT06796517 RECRUITING