Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, HIV-Associated Burkitt's Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00392834

Last Updated: 2018-06-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving rituximab together with combination chemotherapy may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving rituximab together with combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with newly diagnosed, HIV-associated Burkitt's lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Determine the efficacy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and high-dose methotrexate (R-CODOX-M ) alone or alternating with rituximab and ifosfamide, etoposide phosphate, and high-dose cytarabine (IVAC) and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, HIV-associated Burkitt's lymphoma or atypical Burkitt's lymphoma.
* Determine the safety of this regimen in these patients.

Secondary

* Evaluate downstream effectors of apoptosis as mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance and prognosis and perform exploratory analysis of their relationship to treatment effect.
* Evaluate multi-drug resistance gene expression as a mechanism of chemotherapy resistance and prognosis and perform exploratory analysis of their relationship to treatment effect.
* Confirm the use of flow cytometry in the identification of occult leptomeningeal disease and determine whether abnormal flow cytometry is predictive when CNS cytology is negative for malignant cells.
* Determine the biologic and prognostic significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive Burkitt's lymphoma in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era and perform exploratory analysis of their relationship to treatment effect.
* Compare genotyping in patients with HIV-associated Burkitt's lymphoma with that of patients who are HIV-negative and determine whether they are uniform in their genetic profile or whether some cases are more like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
* Determine if EBV detection in cerebrospinal fluid at diagnosis is predictive of leptomeningeal disease.

OUTLINE: This is a prospective, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to risk category (low-risk vs high-risk). Patients with low-risk disease receive 3 courses of R-CODOX-M chemotherapy as described below. Patients with high-risk disease receive 4 alternating courses of R-CODOX-M/IVAC chemotherapy as described below in an A/B/A/B sequence.\* Courses repeat every 21-28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

NOTE: \*In patients presenting with anasarca, pleural effusion, or ascites, methotrexate can pool causing difficulties with clearance; in this case, treatment may be given in a reverse sequence: B/A/B/A.

* Regimen A (R-CODOX-M chemotherapy): Patients receive rituximab\*\* IV and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 1 and 2, pegfilgrastim subcutaneously (SC) on day 3, vincristine IV on days 1 and 8, high-dose methotrexate IV over 2-4 hours on day 15, and leucovorin calcium IV beginning 24 hours after the start of methotrexate and continuing every 6 hours until the methotrexate level is less than 50 nmol/L. Patients receive CNS prophylaxis comprising methotrexate intrathecally (IT), cytarabine IT, and hydrocortisone IT on day 1. Patients with high-risk disease receive an additional dose of cytarabine IT on day 3. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) SC once daily on days 3-9. Once the methotrexate levels drops below 50 nmol/L, patients resume G-CSF SC once daily beginning on approximately day 18 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* Regimen B (rituximab and IVAC chemotherapy): Patients receive rituximab\*\* IV on day 1, ifosfamide IV continuously and etoposide IV continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5, and high-dose cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily on days 1-2. Patients receive CNS prophylaxis comprising methotrexate IT and hydrocortisone IT on day 5. Patients also receive pegfilgrastim SC once 24-48 hours after completion of chemotherapy OR G-CSF SC beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.

Patients with CNS involvement (leptomeningeal and/or intraparenchymal) at diagnosis do not receive CNS prophylaxis as above. Instead, these patients receive a combination of sequential liposomal cytarabine and methotrexate IT or via an Ommaya reservoir on day 1 and then every 14 days as tolerated until completion of systemic chemotherapy.

NOTE: \*\*Rituximab may be given up to 3 days before a chemotherapy course and anytime during the course for 3 (low-risk disease) or 4 (high-risk disease) total doses.

Patients undergo blood and cerebrospinal fluid collection and tumor biopsies periodically during study treatment for correlative studies of prognostic biomarkers predictive of survival (e.g., c-flip protein expression; p53 mutations \[by immunohistochemistry (IHC)\]; multidrug resistance gene expression \[by IHC\]; and Epstein-Barr virus in tumor DNA or cerebrospinal fluid \[by polymerase chain reaction\]); genotyping of Burkitt's lymphoma; and flow cytometry as a tool (by staining) for detecting occult positivity of leptomeningeal disease in Burkitt's lymphoma.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 4 months for at least 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 34 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regimen A (R-CODOX-M chemotherapy)

Patients receive rituximab IV and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 minutes on days 1 and 2, pegfilgrastim SC on day 3, vincristine IV on days 1 and 8, high-dose methotrexate IV over 2-4 hours on day 15, and leucovorin calcium IV beginning 24 hours after the start of methotrexate and continuing every 6 hours until level is adequate. Patients receive CNS prophylaxis of methotrexate IT, cytarabine IT, and hydrocortisone IT on day 1. Patients with high-risk disease receive an additional dose of cytarabine IT on day 3. Patients also receive G-CSF SC once daily on days 3-9. Once the methotrexate levels drops below 50 nmol/L, patients resume G-CSF SC once daily beginning on approximately day 18 and continuing until blood counts recover.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given subcutaneously

pegfilgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given subcutaneously

rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given IV

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

liposomal cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

therapeutic hydrocortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

Regimen B (rituximab and IVAC chemotherapy)

Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1, ifosfamide IV continuously and etoposide IV continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5, and high-dose cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily on days 1-2. Patients receive CNS prophylaxis comprising methotrexate IT and hydrocortisone IT on day 5. Patients also receive pegfilgrastim SC once 24-48 hours after completion of chemotherapy OR G-CSF SC beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients with CNS involvement (leptomeningeal and/or intraparenchymal) at diagnosis do not receive CNS prophylaxis as above. Instead, these patients receive a combination of sequential liposomal cytarabine and methotrexate IT or via an Ommaya reservoir on day 1 and then every 14 days as tolerated until completion of systemic chemotherapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given subcutaneously

pegfilgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given subcutaneously

rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

ifosfamide

Intervention Type DRUG

given IV

liposomal cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

therapeutic hydrocortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

given intrathecally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

filgrastim

given subcutaneously

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

pegfilgrastim

given subcutaneously

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

rituximab

given IV

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

cyclophosphamide

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

given intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

ifosfamide

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

leucovorin calcium

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

liposomal cytarabine

given intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

given intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

therapeutic hydrocortisone

given intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
* No prior therapy for this disease except for 1 of the following :

* Seven consecutive days of steroids alone or in combination with a non-CHOP regimen necessary for patient stabilization (e.g., cyclophosphamide and steroids steroids for normalization of disease-related hyperbilirubinemia)
* One course of CHOP or fractionated CHOP (e.g. CODOX) with or without rituximab
* No epoetin alfa or filgrastim (G-CSF) within 24 hours of study chemotherapy
* No concurrent zidovudine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Emmes Company, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AIDS Malignancy Consortium

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ariela Noy, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

David M. Aboulafia, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Floyd & Delores Jones Cancer Institute at Virginia Mason Medical Center

Lawrence D. Kaplan, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Clinical AIDS Research and Education (CARE) Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Medical Center at Parnassus

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Cancer Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Pennsylvania Oncology Hematology Associates, Incorporated - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Floyd and Delores Jones Cancer Institute at Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University Health Sciences Center - Charleston

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Noy A, Lee JY, Cesarman E, Ambinder R, Baiocchi R, Reid E, Ratner L, Wagner-Johnston N, Kaplan L; AIDS Malignancy Consortium. AMC 048: modified CODOX-M/IVAC-rituximab is safe and effective for HIV-associated Burkitt lymphoma. Blood. 2015 Jul 9;126(2):160-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-623900. Epub 2015 May 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25957391 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01CA070019

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CDR0000510918

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AMC-048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.