The Effects of Ranolazine on Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT ID: NCT01505179
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-02-28
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ranolazine in Diastolic Heart Failure
NCT01163734
The Use of Ranolazine for Atrial Fibrillation and Diastolic Heart Failure
NCT01887353
Effect of Ranolazine on Echocardiographic Indices of Diastolic Dysfunction
NCT00574756
The Effects of Ranolazine on CPET Parameters in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients (ERIC)
NCT01705509
Ranolazine in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT01345188
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ranolazine is a drug that affects the ion channels in the heart. In patients with heart failure, these ion channels do not work properly, and contribute to make the heart stiff. A stiff heart leads to the symptoms of shortness of breath which patients with HFPEF experience. Due to its properties, Ranolazine may improve this stiffness. Ranolazine could improve subject's shortness of breath and ability to exercise.
Currently, ranolazine carries FDA approval for the treatment of chronic angina only. We intend to study ranolazine in patients with HFPEF, in the absence of documented ischemia, to determine whether the drug's lusitropic properties can improve exercise capacity in HFPEF patients.
Previous trials of ranolazine in patients with chronic angina found that there was a dose-dependent relationship between improvements in exercise capacity and ranolazine. However, there did appear to be a plateau in which 1500 mg of ranolazine twice daily improved exercise capacity only slightly more than 1000 mg of ranolazine given twice daily. Additionally, there was a substantially higher rate of adverse events (mainly nausea, dizziness, and asthenia) with the higher dose. Given the desire to maximize benefit and minimize the risk of adverse events, ranolazine 1000 mg by mouth twice daily was chosen as the target dose.
To properly evaluate the effects of Ranolazine, this research study is set up as a double blind, placebo controlled study. Subjects will be randomly assigned (like rolling a dice) to either Ranolazine or placebo (inactive substance). Subjects will have a 50% chance of getting the study drug and 50% chance of getting placebo.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ranolazine
Patients with be given 500 mg by mouth twice a day for three days, and then the dose will be increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily thereafter. (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors including diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, erythromycin, and fluconazole will continue to 500 mg by mouth twice a day for the entire dosing period)
Ranolazine
Patients with be given 500 mg by mouth twice a day for three days, and then the dose will be increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily thereafter. (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors including diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, erythromycin, and fluconazole will continue to 500 mg by mouth twice a day for the entire dosing period)
Placebo
Patients will be given 1 tab twice a day for 3 days, then increasing to 2 tabs twice a day thereafter (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors, will be given 1 tab twice daily for the entire dosing period)
Placebo
Patients will be given 1 tab twice a day for 3 days, then increasing to 2 tabs twice a day thereafter (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors, will be given 1 tab twice daily for the entire dosing period)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ranolazine
Patients with be given 500 mg by mouth twice a day for three days, and then the dose will be increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily thereafter. (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors including diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, erythromycin, and fluconazole will continue to 500 mg by mouth twice a day for the entire dosing period)
Placebo
Patients will be given 1 tab twice a day for 3 days, then increasing to 2 tabs twice a day thereafter (patients who concurrently take moderate CYP3A inhibitors, will be given 1 tab twice daily for the entire dosing period)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of Heart Failure (HF) with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PEF)
* Signs or symptoms of heart failure (breathlessness, pulmonary congestion, edema, fatigue), NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class II-III HF AND
* LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) \> 45% AND
* Evidence of elevated LV filling pressures
1. E/e-prime (E/e') mitral ratio \> 8. Mitral E/e' ratio has been proposed as a noninvasive measure of left ventricular filling pressure.
2. Brain natiuretic peptide (BNP) \> 80 pg/mL. BNP is biomarker of ventricular wall stress.
* Pulmonary Artery systolic pressure estimated at \> 35 mm Hg on echocardiography
* Stable medical management for at least 1 month
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to perform the Naughton protocol exercise test, or an absolute contraindication to exercise testing
* Decompensated heart failure
* Clinically significant valvular disease or congenital cardiac defects
* Clinical diagnosis of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or significant lung pathology
* Prior treatment with ranolazine
* Percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 6 months or planned intervention during the study period
* Acute coronary syndrome within the prior 2 months
* Presence of uncorrected perfusion defects on stress testing
* Presence of angina
* Any rhythm other than sinus
* Electrocardiogram measured QTc interval \> 500 msec
* Clinically significant hepatic impairment (ALT/AST \> 3x upper limit of normal)
* Participation in another investigational drug or device study within 1 month prior to screening
* Females of childbearing potential
* Current treatment with potent inhibitors of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme complex pathways affecting drug metabolism (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and saquinavir)
* Current treatment with CYP3A and/or P-Glycoprotein (Pgp) inducers (e.g. rifampin, rifampicin, carbamazepine, St. John's wort)
* Any other conditions that in the opinion of the investigators are likely to prevent compliance with the study protocol or pose a safety concern if the subject participates in the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gilead Sciences
INDUSTRY
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Denise Barnard
Clinical Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise D Barnard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
110344
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IN-US-259-0109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.