Computer Training Program for Younger Patients With a Brain Tumor Who Underwent Radiation Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01503086

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-30

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized clinical trial studies how well an adaptive computerized cognitive training program works compared to a non-adaptive computerized cognitive training program in treating younger patients with brain tumor who underwent radiation therapy. Providing a computer training program may improve the well-being and quality of life of patients with cognitive (physical and mental) function difficulties caused by radiation therapy to the brain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the feasibility of a home-based, computerized, cognitive training program for patients with pediatric brain tumors who are undergoing cranial radiation therapy (CRT), treated in multiple Children Oncology Group (COG) institutions.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the effect size of this program on measures of attention and working memory in patients with brain tumors treated with CRT in order to design a definitive large-scale clinical trial.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (intervention): Patients undergo a home-based, computerized, interactive training program comprising 3-5 sessions of 15-45 minutes every week for 5-9 weeks. The program contains twelve visually engaging and interesting exercises that target skills involving visual-spatial and verbal working memory (WM). The program is adaptive in a way that each difficulty task is automatically adjusted on a trial-by-trail basis to match a patient's current WM. Each patient has an interventional coach who has online access to patient's training sessions and outcomes (pass or fail). Coaches are able to modify the training sequence or make suggestions to patients and/or parents about how progress can be maximized. Coaches also have telephone meetings with patients and/or families once a week to ensure compliance, track progress, provide feedback, and answer questions that arise during training.

ARM II (control): Patients undergo a home-based, computerized, interactive, non-adaptive training program comprising 3-5 sessions of 15-45 minutes a week for 5-9 weeks. Each patient also has an interventional coach as in arm I. Patients in both arms complete a brief neuropsychological/behavioral assessment comprising the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WIS-IV), the Children's Memory Scale (CMS), and the California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version (CVLT-C) at baseline, after completion of study, and at 6 months after completion of study. Additionally, parents complete a parent-report questionnaire to gather information about patient's behaviors, thoughts, emotions, adaptive skills, and social and functional impairment. Parents and children also complete surveys about the program regarding technical feasibility, adherence, ease-of-use, and satisfaction.

After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up within 3 weeks, then at 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Neoplasm Recurrent Brain Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (interactive training program)

Patients undergo a home-based, computerized, interactive training program comprising 3-5 sessions of 15-45 minutes every week for 5-9 weeks. The program contains twelve visually engaging and interesting exercises that target skills involving visual-spatial and verbal WM. The program is adaptive in a way that each difficulty task is automatically adjusted on a trial-by-trail basis to match a patient's current WM. Each patient has an interventional coach who has online access to patient's training sessions and outcomes (pass or fail). Coaches are able to modify the training sequence or make suggestions to patients and/or parents about how progress can be maximized. Coaches also have telephone meetings with patients and/or families once a week to ensure compliance, track progress, provide feedback, and answer questions that arise during training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Cognitive Assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive computer-assisted cognitive training

Psychosocial Assessment and Care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Arm II (non-adaptive training program)

Patients undergo a home-based, computerized, interactive, non-adaptive training program comprising 3-5 sessions of 15-45 minutes a week for 5-9 weeks. Each patient also has an interventional coach as in arm I. Patients in both arms complete a brief neuropsychological/behavioral assessment comprising the WIS-IV, the CMS, and the CVLT-C at baseline, after completion of study, and at 6 months after completion of study. Additionally, parents complete a parent-report questionnaire to gather information about patient's behaviors, thoughts, emotions, adaptive skills, and social and functional impairment. Parents and children also complete surveys about the program regarding technical feasibility, adherence, ease-of-use, and satisfaction.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Cognitive Assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive computer-assisted cognitive training

Psychosocial Assessment and Care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Cognitive Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training

Receive computer-assisted cognitive training

Intervention Type OTHER

Psychosocial Assessment and Care

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Psychosocial Care/Assessment Quality of Life Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient must be newly diagnosed or relapsed/progressed with a brain tumor that has not previously been treated with CRT

* Note: COG therapeutic study participation is not required for ACCL10P1 enrollment
* Patient enrollment must occur within 4 calendar months following completion of CRT

* Reminder: after patient enrollment, baseline testing followed by randomization must occur within 2-4 months after completion of CRT
* The patient must have an identified caregiver who is willing and able to oversee the training practice during the intervention period (ie, for 5-9 weeks starting approximately 3 months after completion of CRT)
* The patient must have access to a telephone and phone number where they can be reached
* The patient and caregiver must have reading, speaking and listening comprehension of English
* All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent (patient assent is also recommended when applicable according to each institution's policy)
* All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with pontine glioma are not eligible
* Patients with an estimated survival of less than one year are not eligible
* Patients with a history of traumatic brain injury prior to tumor diagnosis are not eligible
* Patients with a motor, visual, or auditory handicap that prevents computer use (e.g., unresolved posterior fossa syndrome) are not eligible to participate in this trial
* Patients with full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) \< 70 per previous testing OR existing diagnosis of/educational classification as a student with an intellectual disability are not eligible
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristina K Hardy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Oncology Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Broward Health Medical Center

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Golisano Children's Hospital of Southwest Florida

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Nemours Children's Clinic-Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Nemours Children's Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Arthur M Blank Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Saint Luke's Cancer Institute - Boise

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Blank Children's Hospital

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

C S Mott Children's Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

East Tennessee Childrens Hospital

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center - University Hospital

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2012-00112

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

COG-ACCL10P1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000721387

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACCL10P1

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

COG-ACCL10P1

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACCL10P1

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U10CA095861

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

UG1CA189955

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

ACCL10P1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neurofeedback and Cognitive Training for PBTS
NCT07085494 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA