Alisertib (MLN8237) or Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01482962

Last Updated: 2018-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

271 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-11

Study Completion Date

2017-12-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, international trial evaluating alisertib compared with single-agent treatment, as selected by the investigator from the offered options of pralatrexate or gemcitabine or romidepsin, in participants with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Note: romidepsin was not used as a single-agent comparator outside the United States of America (USA) as supply was not available.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The drug being tested in this study was Alisertib. Alisertib was tested to treat people who have relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).

This study evaluated alisertib for the improvement in overall response rate (ORR) compared with single-agent treatment, as selected by the investigator from the offered options of pralatrexate, romidepsin (US only), or gemcitabine, in participants with relapsed or refractory PTCL.

The study enrolled 271 patients. Participants were randomized (1:1) to one of 2 treatment arms:

* Alisertib
* Investigator's choice (Pralatrexate, Romidepsin, or Gemcitabine)

This multi-center trial was conducted worldwide. The overall time to participate in this study was approximately 5 years. Participants made multiple visits to the clinic, and then were contacted by telephone up to 42-months after the last participant was randomized, or until death, for follow-up assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alisertib

Alisertib 50 mg, enteric-coated tablet formulation, orally, twice daily for 7 consecutive days (Cycle Days 1-7) in a 21-day cycle (Up to 148 Weeks).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alisertib

Intervention Type DRUG

Alisertib enteric coated tablets

Pralatrexate, or Romidepsin, or Gemcitabine

Pralatrexate 30 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) push over 3 to 5 minutes, once weekly, for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles with concurrent vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation. Cycles were repeated every 7-weeks provided the participant continued to benefit from and tolerate the therapy (Up to 115 Weeks), or Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m\^2 over 30 minutes, intravenously, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle until the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 32 Weeks), or Romidepsin 14 mg/m\^2, intravenously over a 4-hour period, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-cycle. Cycles were repeated every 28 days provided the patient continued to benefit from and tolerate the therapy (Up to 30 Weeks).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pralatrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Pralatrexate IV infusion

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine IV infusion

Romidepsin

Intervention Type DRUG

Romidepsin IV infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alisertib

Alisertib enteric coated tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Pralatrexate

Pralatrexate IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Romidepsin

Romidepsin IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female participants age 18 or older
* Participants with Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) (selected subtypes) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and have relapsed or are refractory to at least 1 prior systemic, cytotoxic therapy for PTCL. Participants must have received conventional therapy as a prior therapy. Cutaneous-only disease is not permitted. Participants must have documented evidence of progressive and measurable disease.
* Tumor biopsy available for central hematopathologic review
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
* Female participants who are post menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse.
* Male participants who agree to practice effective barrier contraception through 6 months after the last dose of alisertib or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse
* Suitable venous access
* Voluntary written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Known central nervous system lymphoma
* Systemic antineoplastic therapy, immunotherapy, investigational agent or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study treatment or concomitant use during study
* Prior administration of an Aurora A kinase-targeted agent, including alisertib; or all of the 3 comparator drugs (pralatrexate, or romidepsin or gemcitabine; or known hypersensitivity)
* History of uncontrolled sleep apnea syndrome or other conditions that could result in excessive daytime sleepiness
* Cardiac condition as specified in study protocol, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<40%
* Concomitant use of other medicines as specified in study protocol
* Participants with abnormal gastric or bowel function who require continuous treatment with H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors
* Known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C
* Autologous stem cell transplant less than 3 months prior to enrollment
* Participants who have undergone allogeneic stem cell or organ transplantation any time
* Inadequate blood levels, bone marrow or other organ function as specified in study protocol
* The participant must have recovered to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Grade ≤ 1 toxicity, to participant's baseline status (except alopecia), or deemed irreversible from the effects of prior cancer therapy
* Major surgery, serious infection, or infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy within 14 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
* Female participants who are breastfeeding or pregnant
* Coexistent second malignancy or history of prior solid organ malignancy within previous 3 years
* Serious medical or psychiatric illness or laboratory abnormality that could, in the investigator's opinion, potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to the protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Concord, , Australia

Site Status

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Minsk Didtrict, , Belarus

Site Status

Vitebsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

Campianas, , Brazil

Site Status

Caxias do Sul, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre/rs, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

SAO Paulo - SP, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Concepción, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Arhus C, , Denmark

Site Status

København Ø, , Denmark

Site Status

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

BENI SWEF, , Egypt

Site Status

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Dakahlia, , Egypt

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Homburg/saar, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Meldola, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Ravenna, , Italy

Site Status

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Durango Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

México, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey Nuevo LEON, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Takapuna, , New Zealand

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

San Juan, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Solna, , Sweden

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile Czechia Denmark Egypt France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Peru Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Sweden Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

O'Connor OA, Ozcan M, Jacobsen ED, Roncero JM, Trotman J, Demeter J, Masszi T, Pereira J, Ramchandren R, Beaven A, Caballero D, Horwitz SM, Lennard A, Turgut M, Hamerschlak N, d'Amore FA, Foss F, Kim WS, Leonard JP, Zinzani PL, Chiattone CS, Hsi ED, Trumper L, Liu H, Sheldon-Waniga E, Ullmann CD, Venkatakrishnan K, Leonard EJ, Shustov AR; Lumiere Study Investigators. Randomized Phase III Study of Alisertib or Investigator's Choice (Selected Single Agent) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 10;37(8):613-623. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00899. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30707661 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-003545-18

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DRKS00004503

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NL39566.068.12

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1181-8218

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C14012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Phase 2 Study of Alisertib Therapy for Rhabdoid Tumors
NCT02114229 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2