Comparison of the BASKA Airway, a Novel Supraglottic Device, to the LMA Airway in Low Risk Female Patients
NCT ID: NCT01482650
Last Updated: 2012-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will determine which device performs best, as measured by key parameters (insertion success rate, seal pressures, time to and ease of insertion, failure rate, complications etc) as regarding the performance and safety profile of the Baska mask and the LMA.
The investigators have two study hypotheses, namely (1) non-inferiority of first placement attempt success rate of Baska vs LMA; and (2) greater seal pressure of the Baska mask vs LMA.
A number of secondary endpoints will be monitored and analyzed (time to and ease of insertion, failure rate, complications etc).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Observational Study of Baska Mask, a New Supraglottic Airway Device
NCT01496859
Comparison of the Baska Mask Airway to a Single-use LMA Device in Low-risk Female Patients
NCT01753635
Determination of the Optimal Approach to Select the Best Size of BASKA Mask to Use in Male Patients
NCT01625052
Observational Study of Baska Mask, a New Supraglottic Airway Device in Children
NCT01625078
Respiration and The Airway With Laryngeal Masks
NCT03542890
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Baska mask is a new supraglottic airway device. It bears many of the features of the industry standard - the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), with few potential improvements:
* The cuff is not pressurized thus reducing the risk of oropharyngeal tissue damage.
* Improved cuff seal during the inspiratory phase of positive pressure ventilation which may reduce leak and make ventilation more efficient.
* An improved system for drainage of oropharyngeal contents intended to reduce the rate of lung aspiration.
* The Baska mask is inserted in neutral head position thus reducing the need for neck manipulation.
* There is integrated bite-block to reduce the risk of patients biting and blocking the airway.
The results from the observational study of the performance of the Baska mask are promising and the investigators feel a randomized comparative study against the gold standard device, the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is justified.
This study is a randomized, single blinded, controlled clinical trial. The participants will be allocated to two groups, in which the investigators will use either a single use LMA device or the Baska mask (single use).
Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval has been obtained. Suitable participants will be recruited after written informed consent and screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Standard anaesthetic preassessment and anaesthesia will be provided.
Consenting patients will be randomly allocated to either of the 2 study groups.
Protocol for airway size selection and attempts at placement will be followed.
The investigators will monitor a number of parameters, including time and ease of insertion, airway seal pressure, airway leak, complications, haemodynamic and ventilatory parameters, ease of removal and other.
Follow up will be performed.
The investigators have two primary hypotheses:
1. That the BASKA mask will have an insertion success rate that is no more than 20% less than that of the single use LMA device.
2. That the seal pressure with the BASKA mask will be 40% higher than that of the single use LMA.
In addition to the above the investigators will evaluate a number of secondary outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Baska mask
supraglottic airway placement and use
The investigators will place the device (Baska mask or LMA) according to a pre-defined protocol and monitor its performance intra and postoperatively.
single use laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
supraglottic airway placement and use
The investigators will place the device (Baska mask or LMA) according to a pre-defined protocol and monitor its performance intra and postoperatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
supraglottic airway placement and use
The investigators will place the device (Baska mask or LMA) according to a pre-defined protocol and monitor its performance intra and postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent
* ASA 1-3
* No relevant allergies
* Body-mass index (BMI) 20-35
* Age 16-85
* Non-urgent surgery of planned duration 0.25-4 hrs
Exclusion Criteria
* Neck pathology
* Previous or anticipated problems with the upper airway or upper GI tract (reflux, hiatus hernia, oropharyngeal tumour, upper respiratory tract infection in the last 10 days)
* BMI \>35
* Predicted or previously documented difficult airway
* Live Pregnancy
* Increased risk for Gastric Aspiration
* Current participation in another Clinical Study
16 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College Hospital Galway
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Laffey
Professor of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Consultant Anaesthetist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Laffey, FFARCSI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National University of Ireland, Galway, and Galway University Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Galway University Hospitals
Galway, Galway, Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C.A. 650
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.