Efficacy and Safety of TAK-875 Compared to Glimepiride When Used With Metformin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01481116

Last Updated: 2016-06-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2454 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875, once daily (QD), plus metformin compared to glimepiride plus metformin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875, once daily (QD), plus metformin compared to glimepiride plus metformin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has increased dramatically throughout the world over the past decades despite the availability of several different treatment options. Current pharmacologic treatments include insulin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, metformin, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetics. A number of these treatments are associated with clinically important side effects such as low blood sugar (hypoglycemia), weight gainflud retention, exaggeration of pre-existent heart failure, and gastrointestinal side effects. These side effects and the disadvantages associated with many of the currently available antidiabetic agents can reduce compliance and limit their long-term use.

Insulin is a hormone that is produced by the body to regulate blood sugar (glucose). In individuals with T2DM, the insulin produced by the body does not effectively control the amount of sugar in the bloodstream. If not properly managed, T2DM may cause elevated blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia) and ultimately result in serious health problems.

In response to this problem, Takeda is developing TAK-875 (an investigational drug) as an addition to diet and exercise to improve blood sugar control in patients with T2DM. TAK-875 may affect the production of insulin and may improve how the body uses the sugar in the blood.

The aim of this study is to find out if TAK-875, when taken for approximately 2 years in combination with current diabetes medicine (called metformin), is safe and effective at helping people with T2DM control their high blood sugar when compared to glimepiride (a type of medication called a sulfonylurea). The study is being done to find out if the combination of TAK-875 plus metformin works as well as the combination of glimepiride plus metformin.

Approximately 2430 patients worldwide aged 18 or over with T2DM, will take part in this study and will be involved in the study for up to 110 or 120 weeks.

TAK-875 is being developed at Takeda Global Research and Development, Inc. as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in participants with T2DM.

This study will investigate TAK-875 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose blood sugar level is inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.

Due to potential concerns about liver safety, on balance, the benefits of treating patients with fasiglifam (TAK-875) do not outweigh the potential risks.

For this reason, Takeda has decided voluntarily to terminate the development activities for fasiglifam.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAK-875 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAK-875

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-875 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for up to 104 weeks.

TAK-875 50 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAK-875

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-875 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin ≥1500 mg or MTD for up to 104 weeks.

Glimepiride 1-2 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

Glimepiride 1 mg, tablets, orally, once daily (up-titrated to 2 mg after 1 week of treatment. Up-titrated to a maximum of 6 mg in 2 mg increments/down titrated if recurrent (or severe) hypoglycemia occurs) and metformin ≥1500 mg or MTD for up to 104 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAK-875

TAK-875 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for up to 104 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-875

TAK-875 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin ≥1500 mg or MTD for up to 104 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Glimepiride

Glimepiride 1 mg, tablets, orally, once daily (up-titrated to 2 mg after 1 week of treatment. Up-titrated to a maximum of 6 mg in 2 mg increments/down titrated if recurrent (or severe) hypoglycemia occurs) and metformin ≥1500 mg or MTD for up to 104 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
2. The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
3. The participant is male or female and 18 years of age or older with a historical diagnosis of T2DM.
4. The participant meets one of the following criteria:

1. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.0 and \<10.0%, and has been on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented MTD) of metformin for at least 2 months prior to Screening. This participant will immediately enter the Placebo Run-in Period, or;
2. The participant has an HbA1c level ≥ 7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of \<1500 mg of metformin without documented MTD for at least 2 months prior to Screening. After completing the Screening Visit, this participant will have their metformin dose immediately increased to ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for an 8-week Titration Period. Following this 8-week period, the participant must qualify for entry into the Placebo Run-in Period by completing the Week -3 procedures and having an HbA1c concentration ≥7.0 and \<10.0%.
5. The participant has had no treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin within 2 months prior to Screening (Exception: if a participant has received other antidiabetic therapy for ≤7 days within the 2 months prior to Screening).
6. The participant has a body mass index (BMI) of ≤45 kg/m2 at Screening.
7. Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, PRN (as needed) use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
8. The participant is able and willing to monitor glucose with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations and complete participant diaries.


1. The participant has an HbA1c concentration ≥7.0% and \<10.0%, and a FPG ≤270 mg/dL (15.0 mmol/L) at the Week -1 Visit. (If the subject does not qualify for randomization based on these criteria, the assessment may be repeated weekly, for a maximum of 2 additional weeks).
2. The participant's compliance with the single-blind study medication during the Placebo Run-in Period is at least 75% and does not exceed 125% based on tablet/capsule counts performed by the study staff.
3. A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative urine hCG pregnancy test at Baseline (Day 1) prior to Randomization and prior to administration of the first dose of double-blind study medication.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or has received an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
2. The participant has been randomized into a previous TAK-875 study
3. The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependant relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
4. The participant donated or received any blood products within 12 weeks prior to Screening or is planning to donate blood during the study.
5. The participant has a hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 gm/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 gm/L) for females at Screening.
6. The participant has a systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥95 mm Hg at Screening (If the participant meets this exclusion criterion, the assessment may be repeated once at least 30 minutes after the initial measurement).
7. The participant has history of cancer that has been in remission for \<5 years prior to Screening. A history of basal cell carcinoma or stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed.
8. The participant has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels \>2.0x upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening.
9. The participant has a total bilirubin level greater than the ULN at Screening. Exception: if a participant has documented Gilbert's Syndrome the participant will be allowed with an elevated bilirubin level per the investigator's discretion.
10. The participant has a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL(males) and ≥1.4 mg/dL(females) and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 at Screening.
11. The participant has uncontrolled thyroid disease.
12. The participant has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
13. The participant has had gastric banding, or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
14. The participant has a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C virus (HCV).
15. The participant had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG), cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to or at Screening.
16. The participant has a history of hypersensitivity, allergies, or has had an anaphylactic reaction(s) to any component of TAK-875, metformin, or glimepiride.
17. The participant has a history of drug abuse (defined as illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to Screening.
18. The participant received excluded medications prior to Screening or is expected to receive excluded medication.
19. If female, the participant is pregnant (confirmed by laboratory testing, i.e., serum/urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), in females of childbearing potential) or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 1 month after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during such time period.
20. The participant is unable to understand verbal or written English or any other language for which a certified translation of the approved informed consent is available.
21. The participant has any other physical or psychiatric disease or condition that in the judgment of the investigator may affect life expectancy or may make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the participant according to the protocol.


1. The participant has received excluded medications listed in the protocol during the Placebo Run-in Period (topical and inhaled corticosteroids are allowed).
2. The participant has a systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥95 mm Hg at Baseline (Day 1) (If the subject meets this exclusion criterion, the assessment may be repeated once at least 30 minutes after the initial measurement and decision will be made based on the second measurement).
3. The participant has a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL(≥133µmol/L) \[males\] and ≥1.4 mg/dL (≥124 µmol/L) \[females\] and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 at Visit 3 (Schedule B subjects only).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Senior Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Davao City, , Philippines

Site Status

Iloilo City, , Philippines

Site Status

Lipa City, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Tarlac City, , Philippines

Site Status

Taytay, , Philippines

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Grodzisk Mazowiecki, , Poland

Site Status

Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Oświęcim, , Poland

Site Status

Parczew, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Puławy, , Poland

Site Status

Płock, , Poland

Site Status

Ruda Śląska, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Zgierz, , Poland

Site Status

Łęczyca, , Poland

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Constanța, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Kempton Park, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Krugersdorp, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Middelburg, Mpumalanga, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Somerset West, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Worcester, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Chia-Yi City, , Taiwan

Site Status

New Taipei City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Luhansk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Mykolayiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cheadle, Cheshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Watford, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Thornton-Cleveleys, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, South Glamorgan, United Kingdom

Site Status

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Goodyear, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

North Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, California, United States

Site Status

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Calabash, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morganton, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spring, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Hampton, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Corrientes, Corrientes Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Brookvale, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Mosman, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Woy Woy, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Canberra, , Australia

Site Status

Blagoevgrad, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sevlievo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Longueuil, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Mirabel, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Medellín, , Colombia

Site Status

Benátky nad Jizerou, , Czechia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Choceň, , Czechia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Jindřichův Hradec, , Czechia

Site Status

Mariánské Lázně, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava - Moravska Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava - Vitkovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Praha 4 - Krc, , Czechia

Site Status

Znojmo, , Czechia

Site Status

Paide, , Estonia

Site Status

Rakvere, , Estonia

Site Status

Saku, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Võru, , Estonia

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Beer Yaakov, , Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Giv‘atayim, , Israel

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Raanana, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Rishon LeZiyyon, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Jelgava, , Latvia

Site Status

Limbaži, , Latvia

Site Status

Ogre, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Talsi, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Alytus, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Malacca, Melaka, Malaysia

Site Status

Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

Site Status

Taiping, Perak, Malaysia

Site Status

Taiping, Perak, Perak, Malaysia

Site Status

Putrajaya, Putrajaya, Malaysia

Site Status

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Site Status

Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia

Site Status

Terengganu, , Malaysia

Site Status

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Palmerston North, , New Zealand

Site Status

Rotorua, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Bulgaria Canada Colombia Czechia Estonia Hong Kong Israel Latvia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Philippines Poland Romania Russia South Africa Taiwan Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30880443 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-001731-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1124-2296

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-875_304CTIL

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DOH-27-0512-3913

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11-057

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NMRR-11-882-10318

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HKCTR-1616

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

262

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

12/WA/0245

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-875_304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01408095 WITHDRAWN PHASE2