Treatment of Social Competence After Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT ID: NCT01465269
Last Updated: 2015-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
231 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Roll for Intervention - TBI Group Treatment
NCT05517161
Restoration of Life Role Participation Through Cognitive and Motor Training for TBI
NCT01158781
Validation of Cognitive Enhancement Techniques for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT04245124
Computerized Attention Training for Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury
NCT01641432
Innovative Multimodal and Attention Training to Improve Emotion Communication in Veterans With TBI and PTSD
NCT05478759
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aims and Hypotheses: Aim 1: Measure the effectiveness of the GIST intervention with multisite implementation. Hypothesis 1a: Those receiving the GIST will demonstrate significant improvement in social competence, compared to those receiving the alternative treatment, as measured by the Profile of Pragmatic Impairment in Communication (PPIC). Hypothesis 1b: Compared to the alternative intervention, those receiving the GIST will maintain improvement in social competence at 3 months post-intervention, as measured by the PPIC. Hypothesis 1c: Compared to the alternative intervention, those receiving the GIST will demonstrate improvement in additional aspects related to social competence at 3 months post-intervention, as measured by the LaTrobe Communication Questionnaire, the Goal Attainment Scale, the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List - Civilian version. Hypothesis 1d: Compared to the alternative intervention, those receiving the GIST will demonstrate improvement at 3 months post intervention in quality of life, as measured by the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Aim 2: Identify the potent ingredients associated with the GIST. Hypothesis 2a: FOr participants in the GIST intervention, higher group cohesion measured by the TFI: Cohesiveness Scale will be associated with improved social competence. Hypothesis 2b: Compared to the alternative intervention, those receiving the GIST will demonstrate stronger social self efficacy associated with improved social competence, as measured by the Scale of Perceived Self Efficacy.
Study Design: This study uses a two-arm, multi-centered randomized controlled clinical trial design to compare the GIST treatment to an alternative treatment, in which participants are presented information from the GIST treatment program without the group process. A total of 192 military, veteran and civilian participants with mild to moderate TBI will be enrolled by six centers. Measures will be collected at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment. Videotapes of participants will be evaluated for social competence by blinded independent raters, and progress on individualized social skills goals will be assessed. Replicable training of group leaders will include a 2 ½ day in-person workshop followed by feedback during a pilot of the intervention and alternative intervention. The fidelity of the intervention will be assessed by independent raters using a standardized instrument to ensure that the intervention is implemented consistently. Results of this study will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders via presentations and publications. By the end of this study, the field will have definitive evidence about the effectiveness of a group social competence intervention for people with TBI.
Military Benefit: The proposed study has a high degree of relevance for returning OIF/OEF soldiers and veterans post-TBI due to the prevalence of social reintegration difficulties in this population. The GIST intervention has the potential to assist our soldiers and veterans in returning to full participation in their families, communities and productive activity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GIST Intervention
Group Interactive Structured Treatment
GIST groups consist of 8 group participants and two group therapists. Group members receive the workbook and are asked to bring it to each session. During each of the 13, 1.5 hour sessions, key concepts from the previous session are reviewed, a new topic is discussed, strategies and skills are practiced interactively, and real-life social problems are addressed. Previously covered topics are integrated into each session through discussion and problem solving to provide repetition and reinforcement of information.
Alternative Intervention
Alternative Intervention
Participants in the alternative treatment will attend 13 weekly classroom sessions, where they will view video presentations of the same curriculum topics covered in the GIST workbook. The group therapists will serve as moderators and will meet with participants individually. Group interaction will not be encouraged. Homework exercises will be offered but participants will not be asked to return their homework and will not receive any feedback.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group Interactive Structured Treatment
GIST groups consist of 8 group participants and two group therapists. Group members receive the workbook and are asked to bring it to each session. During each of the 13, 1.5 hour sessions, key concepts from the previous session are reviewed, a new topic is discussed, strategies and skills are practiced interactively, and real-life social problems are addressed. Previously covered topics are integrated into each session through discussion and problem solving to provide repetition and reinforcement of information.
Alternative Intervention
Participants in the alternative treatment will attend 13 weekly classroom sessions, where they will view video presentations of the same curriculum topics covered in the GIST workbook. The group therapists will serve as moderators and will meet with participants individually. Group interaction will not be encouraged. Homework exercises will be offered but participants will not be asked to return their homework and will not receive any feedback.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sustained a TBI anytime after October 2001;
* are at least 6 months post injury
* score at Level 1 (Independent) or Level 2 (Overnight Supervision) on the Supervision Rating Scale;
* are 18 years of age or older at the time of the study;
* have adequate receptive/expressive communication skills functional for group participation, (score \>5 on the Comprehension and Expression of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM)70 based on results of screening interview;
* possess the English language skills necessary to participate in the group intervention and complete study measures;
* demonstrate some aspect of problematic social competence by responding "yes" to at least one of 5 screening statements listed here, as reported by the participant or their support person.
* provide Informed Consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* are unable to attend the majority of group sessions (e.g., living at a distance from the site without consistent transportation; going on an extended vacation, planned surgeries, planning to move);
* are currently involved in ongoing structured group psycho-social therapy;
* are currently participating in another clinical trial.
* are currently in one-on-one therapy with one of the therapists
* have already participated in the GIST intervention
* in the opinion of the PI, have any conditions which might interfere with complete of the study protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana
OTHER
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
FED
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
FED
Wayne State University
OTHER
University of Washington
OTHER
Craig Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cynthia Harrison-Felix, PhD
Assistant Director of Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center
Palo Alto, California, United States
Craig Hospital
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Hunter Holmes McGuire Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harrison-Felix C, Newman JK, Hawley L, Morey C, Ketchum JM, Walker WC, Bell KR, Millis SR, Braden C, Malec J, Hammond FM, Eagye CB, Howe L. Social Competence Treatment After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Interactive Group Treatment Versus Noninteractive Treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;99(11):2131-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PT100068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.