Gastrostomy Tube Placed After Gastropexy Versus Gastrostomy Tube Placed Using the Traditional Push/Pull Techniques
NCT ID: NCT01463540
Last Updated: 2025-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
206 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Advantage of direct techniques are the followings:
1. the tube can placed also in the case of an oesophageal stenosis
2. studies suggest that the peristomal wound infection are less frequent using direct techniques
3. in some variants of these techniques, a balloon type gastrostomy tube or a button can be placed also in the case of first positioning. Both the balloon type tube and the button are easy to be changed also at the bed-side.
Drawbacks of the direct techniques are:
1. these technique are easy, but a little more cumbersome than classic push or pull maneuvers
2. operators are often not familiar with direct insertion
3. kits suited for direct insertion are generally more costly than available kits for push or pull placement of gastrostomy tube.
The kit manufactured by the Kimberly-Clark (MIC Introducer kit) allows direct insertion of a balloon type gastrostomy tube or of a button and it is interesting, because it makes simple to perform the gastropexy.
The study aim is to confirm that the use of the Kit Introducer MIC, may allow safe placement of a gastrostomy tube and may reduce the incidence of peristomal wound infection. Furthermore if a balloon type gastrostomy tube or a button are positioned, they may be changed at the bed-side, without referral of the patient to the endoscopic unit or to an other sanitary facility.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Replacement Gastrostomy Tubes: Technical and Clinical Comparison of Five Commercial Models
NCT01698827
Novel Balloon-Assisted vs Direct Technique in EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy
NCT07161856
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Otorhinolaryngologist
NCT01476241
Staple Line Inversion vs Buttressing on Postoperative Vomits After LSG
NCT03104023
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity and Microbiota Randomized Trial
NCT04200144
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Push/pull endoscopic gastrostomy
A 20 Fr gastrostomy tube, placed using push/pull techniques.
In this group a 20 Fr gastrostomy tube will be placed, of the type in use at each centre, using the push or the pull method. Positioning of the gastrostomy tube will be carried out endoscopically in sedated patients, after antibiotic prophylaxis. Single dose ampicillin/sulbactam 1g/500 mg will be infused intravenously 30 minutes before positioning. In patients just receiving antibiotic therapy, as treatment of concomitant disease, the current therapy will be continued and antibiotic prophylaxis with ampicillin/sulbactam will be not given.
Gastrostomy after gastropexy
A 20 Fr balloon type tube, placed after gastropexy.
In this group a 20 Fr balloon type gastrostomy tube will be placed endoscopically, after gastropexy performed using the Kimberly Clarke MIC Introducer kit, according to the instructions suggested by the manufacturer. The kit includes 4 T-fasteners (only 3 are usually placed in clinical use) and a serial 24 Fr dilator with a pell-away sheath. All commercially available brands of balloon type gastrostomy tubes will be allowed for use in the study. Positioning of the gastrostomy tube will be carried out in sedated patients, after antibiotic prophylaxis (Single dose ampicillin/sulbactam 1g/500 mg ev.). In patients just receiving antibiotic therapy, as treatment of concomitant disease, the current therapy will be continued and antibiotic prophylaxis will be not given.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A 20 Fr gastrostomy tube, placed using push/pull techniques.
In this group a 20 Fr gastrostomy tube will be placed, of the type in use at each centre, using the push or the pull method. Positioning of the gastrostomy tube will be carried out endoscopically in sedated patients, after antibiotic prophylaxis. Single dose ampicillin/sulbactam 1g/500 mg will be infused intravenously 30 minutes before positioning. In patients just receiving antibiotic therapy, as treatment of concomitant disease, the current therapy will be continued and antibiotic prophylaxis with ampicillin/sulbactam will be not given.
A 20 Fr balloon type tube, placed after gastropexy.
In this group a 20 Fr balloon type gastrostomy tube will be placed endoscopically, after gastropexy performed using the Kimberly Clarke MIC Introducer kit, according to the instructions suggested by the manufacturer. The kit includes 4 T-fasteners (only 3 are usually placed in clinical use) and a serial 24 Fr dilator with a pell-away sheath. All commercially available brands of balloon type gastrostomy tubes will be allowed for use in the study. Positioning of the gastrostomy tube will be carried out in sedated patients, after antibiotic prophylaxis (Single dose ampicillin/sulbactam 1g/500 mg ev.). In patients just receiving antibiotic therapy, as treatment of concomitant disease, the current therapy will be continued and antibiotic prophylaxis will be not given.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* age \> 85 years old
* pregnancy
* coagulation deficit or anti-coagulant oral therapy
* total gastrectomy
* absence of trans-illumination, verified during esophagogastroduodenoscopy
* pharyngeal or esophageal stenosis, not allowing the passage of a standard scope;
* ascitis
* active gastric ulcer
* the patient or his tutor do not consent to the study
* documented allergy to penicillin
* ASA V.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lorenzo Camellini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Vincenzo Mirante, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Nuovo Ospedale Estense - AUSL Modena
Veronica Iori, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Angela Mazzocchi, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Artificial Nutrition Interdisciplinary Team - AUSL Reggio Emilia
Fabio Fabbian, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Endoscopy Unit - AUSL RE
Rita Conigliaro, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Nuovo Ospedale Estense - AUSL Modena
Romano Sassatelli, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Giorgio Iori, Reg. Nurse
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Digestive Endoscopy Unit - Nuovo Ospedale Estense
Modena, MO, Italy
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit - Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
Endoscopic Unit "South Area" - AUSL Reggio Emilia
Scandiano, RE, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maetani I, Tada T, Ukita T, Inoue H, Sakai Y, Yoshikawa M. PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun;57(7):837-41. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70017-0.
Jain NK, Larson DE, Schroeder KW, Burton DD, Cannon KP, Thompson RL, DiMagno EP. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Dec;107(6):824-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-6-824.
Shastri YM, Hoepffner N, Tessmer A, Ackermann H, Schroeder O, Stein J. New introducer PEG gastropexy does not require prophylactic antibiotics: multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):620-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.044.
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N, Fujii H, Kajiyama M. Prospective randomized trial comparing the direct method using a 24 Fr bumper-button-type device with the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):722-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077490. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASMN1PEG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.