Effects of Donepezil and Memantine on Cognitive Functions After a Sleep Deprivation Challenge in Healthy Volunteers
NCT ID: NCT01461174
Last Updated: 2015-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Memantine in the Treatment of Memory, Concentration or Attention Problems
NCT01261741
fMRI-behavioral Study of Cholinergic Augmentation With Donepezil in Healthy Sleep Deprived Adults
NCT00800553
The Efficacy of a Combination Regimen in Patients With Mild to Moderate Probable Alzheimer's Disease
NCT01921972
Comparison of Once Daily and Twice Daily Dosing on Safety and Tolerability of Memantine in Patients With Alzheimer
NCT02553928
Post-marketing Surveillance of Donepezil Hydrochloride Investigation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Combination Therapy of Donepezil Hydrochloride and Memantine Hydrochloride in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT02162251
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With the inherent difficulty of detecting significant improvements in cognitive performance in normal healthy subjects, it is presently incredibly hard to predict and select efficacious agents early in the drug development process. As such the potential success of novel therapeutic agents for the symptomatic relief of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is largely unknown until the drugs enter relatively large studies, assessing clinical outcome over at least a six month period. To try to overcome this issue, clinical scientists have focused their attention to the development of cognitive endpoints/biomarkers that can be detected in a number of experimental paradigms where cognitive impairments akin to those observed in AD, have been artificially induced.Based on the scientific literature, the use of total Sleep Deprivation in healthy volunteers seems to be a good paradigm to assess potential anti-AD agents.
It is the first multicenter study that combines 3 complementary approaches via a standardization of the sleep deprivation model: cognitive evaluations, imaging and neurophysiology.
STUDY OBJECTIVE(S)
Primary:
The study aim is to assess the utility of sleep deprivation as a potential model for prediction of clinical efficacy using a combination of cognitive physiological endpoints.
The main goals are to test the effects of donepezil and memantine treatment on cognitive functions in young healthy deprived subjects and to assess the potential restoring effect of the two drugs on cognitive functions induce by sleep deprivation.
Secondary:
* To assess that Sleep Deprivation model results in cognitive impairments
* To determine the sensitivity of the model by testing the restoring effects of one single dose of modafinil
* To investigate the reversal effect of modafinil on EEG under sleep deprivation.
* To investigate the reversal effect of modafinil on fMRI acquisitions under sleep deprivation (subjects that will be included in Toulouse will not have fMRI)
* To investigate the influence of donepezil and memantine on EEG under sleep deprivation.
* To investigate the influence of donepezil and memantine on fMRI acquisitions under sleep deprivation (subjects that will be included in Toulouse will not have fMRI).
STUDY DESIGN The study is a phase I, multicentric (Lille, Marseille, Toulouse), randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over design.
STUDY POPULATION Healthy young male subjects from 25 to 40 years-old (36 subjects randomized)
PRIMARY ENDPOINT(S) AND MAIN SECONDARY ENDPOINT(S)
Primary endpoint:
N-back test
Secondary endpoints:
* Other cognitive assessments
* Imaging
* Neurophysiology
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Modafinil
200 mg tablet, single dose
Modafinil
200 mg tablet, single dose
Donepezil
5 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Donepezil
Donepezil or placebo, 5 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Memantine
10 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Memantine
Memantine or placebo, 10 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modafinil
200 mg tablet, single dose
Donepezil
Donepezil or placebo, 5 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Memantine
Memantine or placebo, 10 mg tablet one per day, 15 days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Healthy male subjects aged between 25 and 40 years-old inclusive
2. BMI between 18 kg/m2 to 27 kg/m2
Health status
3. The subjects is in good health on the basis of the medical interview (medical history, symptoms) and the physical examination, vital signs and the results of blood chemistry and hematology.
4. ECG (12 leads) normal (120 \< PR \< 200 ms; QRS \< 120ms; QTcF \< 450ms) and/or without clinically relevant impairments as judged by investigator.
5. The subject does not smoke or smokes a maximum of 5 cigarettes per day and is able to stop during the days of the study.
6. No claustrophobia (fMRI)
7. The subject has normal visual and auditory abilities
Specific to the study
8. Habitual good sleeping: sleeping on average 6,5 to 9 hours each night in the past month assessed by the Pittsburgh Quality Index.
9. Regular sleeping hours whereby they sleep no later than 1 am and rise before 9 am in the past month assessed by the Pittsburgh Quality Index.
10. The subject can complete the neuropsychological test battery during the training session
11. The subject corresponds to an extravert personality according to the Eysenck Personality Inventory
12. The subject is right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, Imaging measurement condition).
Regulations
13. The subjects is able to read and understand the Information Form and comply with the protocol instructions and restrictions
14. Subjects are covered by a social insurance
15. Subjects have provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
1. History or presence of psychiatric illness assessed by a psychiatric interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I-DSM IV).
2. History or presence of neurologic illness or others illnesses (general medical interview)
3. The subject has caffeine intake of greater than 5 drinks per day or excessive energy drink type intake.
4. The subject has an orthostatic blood pressure reduction \> 20 mm Hg, based on a difference of systolic blood pressure between supine and after standing for 3 minutes.
General conditions
5. The patient, in the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason
6. The subject participates to another clinical trial or is still being within a washout period of a previous clinical trial, or subjects who received more than 4500 euros in the previous 12 months.
Specific to the study
7. History or presence of daytime sleepiness with the Epworth scale (score \> 10, pathological sleepiness).
8. History of obstructive sleep apnea assessed by the Berlin questionnaire.
9. History of periodic leg movements assessed by Restless Legs Syndrome questionnaire.
10. Extreme chronotypes: score at the Horne Ostberg scale (\< 31 or \> 69).
11. Jet lag \> 2 hours in the last two weeks.
12. No time-shifted work during the last month.
25 Years
40 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Union
OTHER
Qualissima
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christine Audebert
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CIC CPCET
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CIC
Lille, , France
MEDES
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-000344-25
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
WP1P001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.