Efficacy and Tolerability of Memantine in Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) Patients
NCT ID: NCT00200538
Last Updated: 2013-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Once Daily and Twice Daily Dosing on Safety and Tolerability of Memantine in Patients With Alzheimer
NCT02553928
Memantine (10mg BID) for the Frontal and Temporal Subtypes of Frontotemporal Dementia
NCT00545974
Memantine for Agitation in Dementia
NCT00371059
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00322153
Safety and Tolerability of Rivastigmine With Add-on Memantine in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00305903
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. recent availability of reliable diagnostic criteria (the Lund and Manchester groups' consensus statement in 1994; revised in 1998),
2. the very small number of cases as opposed to AD-the number of cases was estimated at approximately 3,500 vs 600,000, for AD, in France in 2004-, FTD therefore falls into the category of rare diseases (i.e., less than 30,000 cases),
3. the scarcity of valuable physiopathological hypotheses.
Besides a non-specific serotoninergic dysfunction, no significant anomalies related to particular neuromediators have apparently been found (as opposed to AD, which is characterized by a cholinergic deficit). In 1998, the discovery of mutations in the Tau gene in certain kindreds showing a dominant autosomal transmission of FTD, oriented research efforts toward the tau protein and provided new perspectives. Many studies have suggested the role of excitotoxicity. Abnormal aggregation of the tau protein has been observed in the brains of a majority of FTD patients (familial and sporadic form). Excitotoxicity may be responsible for promoting this abnormal aggregation through modification of the expression and phosphorylation state of the tau protein. The hypothesis of this study is that an anti-excitotoxic neuroprotective treatment may slow the pathogenic process and therefore be an effective treatment for this pathology.
Goals: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of memantine (anti-excitotoxic, neuroprotective treatment currently used in AD) in FTD patients after a one-year treatment.
Type of study: National, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II therapeutic trial.
Study design: Sixty four (64) patients, aged 45 to 75 years, will be enrolled in the study for a period of 12 months (clinical inclusion criteria are defined based on the Lund and Manchester group consensus statement \[revised version 1998\]), and followed up for 1 year in a controlled study. At the time of inclusion, the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score should be at least 19 (below 18, a neuropsychological examination is impossible). Patients will either take memantine, or a placebo (randomization ratio of 1:1) twice a day (i.e., 20 mg of memantine per day in the memantine arm). The primary efficacy variable will be a global assessment tool, the CIBIC-Plus (Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input). Secondary efficacy variables will include behavioral scales \[the NeuroPsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Frontal Behavior Inventory (FBI)\], cognitive scales \[the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), the MMSE\], activities of daily living (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD), time spent by the caregiver of the patient (Resource Utilization in Dementia, RUD), and caregiver burden scale (Zarit Burden Inventory), and tolerability of the drug. The main analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomized patients having undergone at least one evaluation after inclusion (the Last Observation Carried Forward LOCF value, will be attributed to missing values). This analysis will be carried out at the end of the double-blind study (main judgement criterion)
Expected results and perspectives: The main expected result is the confirmation of the efficacy of memantine as a treatment for FTD, which would set a precedent in the treatment of this disease. Such a result could also lead the way to the development of treatments for other related neurodegenerative disorders (tauopathies) such as the other frontotemporal lobar degenerations (semantic dementia, progressive non-fluent aphasia), progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal degeneration. Finally, the standardized follow-up of a 64 patient cohort in this study will provide important information on the natural history of a rare and poorly-known disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
memantine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MMSE score of 19 or higher
* Men and women aged 45 to 75 years
* Without speech, visuospatial, or episodic memory impairments
Exclusion Criteria
* Illiterate or misunderstanding patients
* Patients with cancer, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease (creatinine \> 200 mg/dL), or epilepsy
45 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martine Vercelletto, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre de la Mémoire, Clinique Neurologique CHU Nord Nantes 44093 France; [email protected]
Lucette Lacomblez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Federation de Neurologie AP-HP Paris 75 013 France; [email protected]
Bruno Dubois, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre du Langage et de Neuropsychologie AP-HP Paris 75013 France; [email protected]
Anne Sophie Rigaud, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Broca, Paris 75 France; [email protected]
Jean-Francois Dartigues, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Pellegrin Bordeaux 33 076 France; [email protected]
Sophie Auriacombe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Pellegrin Bordeaux 33 076 France ; [email protected]
Philippe Couratier, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges 87000 France; [email protected]
Jacques Touchon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Gui de Chaulliac, Montpellier 34 295 France; [email protected]
Matthieu Ceccaldi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital de la Timone Marseille 13 005 France; [email protected]
Mira Didic, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital de la Timone Marseille 13005 France; [email protected]
Serge Bakchine, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Maison Blanche, Reims 51 092 France; [email protected]
Bernard-Francois Michel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, 13009 France; [email protected]
Catherine Thomas-Anterion, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Bellevue Saint Etienne, 42 000 France; [email protected]
Bernard Laurent, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Bellevue Saint Etienne 42 000 France; [email protected]
Francois Sellal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Civil Strasbourg 67000 France; [email protected]
Serge Belliard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes 35 000, France; [email protected]
Herve Allain, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Service de Pharmacologie, CHU de Rennes 35 000 France ; [email protected]
Michele Puel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse 31059 France; [email protected]
Jean-Francois Demonet, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinique Neurologique CHU Purpan Toulouse 31059 France; [email protected]
Marie Sarazin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre du Langage et de la Mémoire, Hôpital de la Salpétriére AP-HP Paris 75013 France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Martine Vercelletto
Nantes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Lebouvier T, Volteau C, Jaulin P, Lacomblez L, Damier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Vercelletto M. Prospective evaluation of behavioral scales in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;34(2):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000341784. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Vercelletto M, Boutoleau-Bretonniere C, Volteau C, Puel M, Auriacombe S, Sarazin M, Michel BF, Couratier P, Thomas-Anterion C, Verpillat P, Gabelle A, Golfier V, Cerato E, Lacomblez L; French research network on Frontotemporal dementia. Memantine in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: negative results. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(4):749-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101632.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BRD 05/1-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.