An Intervention to Improve Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Deactivation Conversations

NCT ID: NCT01459744

Last Updated: 2016-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

562 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) is a device implanted in a patient's chest to monitor the heart rhythm and deliver shocks to terminate potentially lethal arrhythmias when necessary. While ICDs reduce sudden cardiac death, patients with ICDs eventually die of heart failure or other diseases. As patients near the end of life, physiologic changes (intrinsic and extrinsic to the heart) may affect the cardiac conduction system, leading to more arrhythmias and increasing the frequency of shocks. Because ICD shocks can cause pain and anxiety and may not prolong a life of acceptable quality, it is appropriate to consider deactivating the shocking function of ICDs as patients' clinical status worsens and death is near. This will be a randomized controlled trial of a physician centered counseling and education intervention to improve clinician-patient communication about the management of ICDs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) is a device implanted in a patient's chest to monitor the heart rhythm and deliver shocks to terminate potentially lethal arrhythmias when necessary. While ICDs reduce sudden cardiac death, patients with these devices do eventually die, either of heart failure or other chronic diseases. As a patient's disease worsens, physiologic changes (intrinsic and extrinsic to the heart) may affect the cardiac conduction system, leading to more arrhythmias and increasing the frequency of shocks. Because ICD shocks can cause pain and anxiety and may not prolong a life of acceptable quality, it is appropriate to consider ICD deactivation as a patient's clinical status worsens and death is near. However, these conversations rarely occur. The investigators propose to conduct a randomized clinical trial of a physician-centered patient counseling and support intervention to improve communication between cardiologists and patients with ICDs. The goals of the study are to determine the effectiveness of the intervention to: 1) increase conversations about ICD deactivation, 2) increase the number of patients who have their devices deactivated, and 3) improve mental health outcomes for bereaved caregivers of deceased patients. The unit of randomization is the hospital, the intervention is aimed at cardiologists, and the unit of analysis is the patient. The investigators have created a network of six academic medical centers across the country. The intervention to be delivered consists of three parts. First, the PI will conduct a workshop on communication specific to ICD-deactivation with cardiologists at the intervention centers. Second, when enrolled patients are admitted to the hospital or seen in the outpatient setting, the cardiologist will receive two reminders (one via email, one in the patient chart) that the patient is appropriate for a conversation about ICD deactivation. Finally, cardiologists will receive aggregated feedback about the number of conversations they have conducted and data on patients' satisfaction with conversations every six months. Physicians at usual care hospitals receive a didactic lecture on advance care planning. All patients and surrogates will be interviewed at baseline and then assessed at regular intervals to determine the outcomes of: 1) the prevalence of conversations about ICD deactivation as reported by the patient/surrogate; and 2) the frequency with which patients have their devices deactivated. Caregivers will continue to be interviewed at regular intervals up to 6 months after the patient dies to determine the relationship of the intervention to caregiver mental health outcomes. Given the exponential increase in the number of patients with ICDs, this intervention has the potential to improve the quality of care for thousands of patients near the end of life and their families.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Communication training for cardiologists

The intervention consists of an educational workshop for heart failure physicians, a reminder system, and a system providing aggregated feedback on their conversations with patients about ICD deactivation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Communication training for cardiologists.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Communication training: a 90 minute workshop to discuss ways to improve communication in patients with serious illness.

Reminders to Cardiologists. Cardiologists will receive reminders to prompt them to have conversations relating to ICD management with patients enrolled in the study.

Audit and feedback. Cardiologists will receive feedback on their rates of conversation as well as data on patient/family satisfaction with their communication skills.

Control arm

Cardiology grand rounds will be held at usual care sites on the importance of advance care planning.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control arm

Intervention Type OTHER

Cardiology grand rounds will be held at usual care sites on the importance of advance care planning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Communication training for cardiologists.

Communication training: a 90 minute workshop to discuss ways to improve communication in patients with serious illness.

Reminders to Cardiologists. Cardiologists will receive reminders to prompt them to have conversations relating to ICD management with patients enrolled in the study.

Audit and feedback. Cardiologists will receive feedback on their rates of conversation as well as data on patient/family satisfaction with their communication skills.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control arm

Cardiology grand rounds will be held at usual care sites on the importance of advance care planning.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Clinicians:

* At all sites, a core group of approximately 10 heart failure clinicians (physicians, nurses) care exclusively for patients with advanced heart failure in both inpatient and outpatient settings; all of these clinicians are eligible..

Patients:

* Patient does not currently have a ventricular assist device
* Age \> 18
* Fluent in English
* Consistent and reliable access to a phone

For Inpatient:

* Has had at least 1 other heart failure in the last year, OR
* Meets all three of the following criteria at time of admission:

1. BUN \> 43
2. SBP ≤ 115
3. CR \> 2.75 OR
* Was on inotropes OR intravenous diuretics OR intravenous heart failure treatments in emergency department OR in outpatient setting prior to the current hospital admission

For Outpatient

* Has had 2 or more heart failure related admissions in the last year OR
* Has class IV heart failure in the outpatient setting OR
* Has Class III heart failure in outpatient setting AND 1 heart failure related admission in the last year OR
* Has Class III heart failure in outpatient setting AND 2 of the following 4 conditions:

1. Age ≥ 70
2. BUN ≥ 43
3. Cr ≥ 2.75
4. SBP≤115 OR
* Is on inotropes (e.g., dobutamine, milrinone) OR intravenous diuretics OR intravenous heart failure treatments in emergency department OR in outpatient setting

Caregivers:

* Age \> 18
* Fluent in English
* Consistent and reliable access to a phone

Exclusion Criteria

* Not having an ICD
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathan E. Goldstein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado - Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Yale New-Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Mayo Medical Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, Prystowsky EN, Hafley G. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 16;341(25):1882-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912163412503.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10601507 (View on PubMed)

Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, Brown MW, Heo M. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1933-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352601.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8960472 (View on PubMed)

Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11907286 (View on PubMed)

Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G, McNulty SE, Clapp-Channing N, Davidson-Ray LD, Fraulo ES, Fishbein DP, Luceri RM, Ip JH; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15659722 (View on PubMed)

Glikson M, Friedman PA. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1107-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04263-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11297981 (View on PubMed)

Eckert M, Jones T. How does an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) affect the lives of patients and their families? Int J Nurs Pract. 2002 Jun;8(3):152-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00357.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12000634 (View on PubMed)

Sears SF Jr, Conti JB. Quality of life and psychological functioning of icd patients. Heart. 2002 May;87(5):488-93. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.5.488. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11997430 (View on PubMed)

Gelfman LP, Sudore RL, Mather H, McKendrick K, Hutchinson MD, Lampert RJ, Lipman HI, Matlock DD, Swetz KM, Pinney SP, Morrison RS, Goldstein NE. Prognostic Awareness and Goals of Care Discussions Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006502. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006502. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32873058 (View on PubMed)

Goldstein NE, Mather H, McKendrick K, Gelfman LP, Hutchinson MD, Lampert R, Lipman HI, Matlock DD, Strand JJ, Swetz KM, Kalman J, Kutner JS, Pinney S, Morrison RS. Improving Communication in Heart Failure Patient Care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;74(13):1682-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.058.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31558252 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HL102084-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

GCO 09-0618

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.