Clinical Trial Evaluating Technosphere® Insulin Versus Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Over a 24-week Treatment Period

NCT ID: NCT01445951

Last Updated: 2014-10-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

518 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Open-label, randomized, forced-titration clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TI Inhalation Power in combination with a basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with a basal insulin

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Phase 3 clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of inhaled prandial TI Inhalation Power in combination with basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with basal insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes who are suboptimally controlled with their current insulin regimens. This trial will employ a variety of methods to intensively manage these subjects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler

Subjects will receive TI with the MedToneC inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin

Aspart Group

Subjects will receive insulin aspart and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable insulin

Technosphere ® Insulin-Gen2 Group

Subject will receive Technosphere Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler

Intervention Type DRUG

Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler

Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler

Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin

Injectable insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women = 18 years of age
* Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 12 months
* Body mass index (BMI) = 38 kg/m2
* Stable dose of basal/bolus insulin therapy for at least 3 months with an FPG consistently \< 220 mg/dL:
* HbA1c = 7.5% and = 10.0%
* Fasting C-peptide = 0.30 pmol/mL
* Subject willingness to not use CGM during the entire course of the trial
* Nonsmoking (includes cigarettes, cigars, pipes, and chewing tobacco) for the preceding 6 months
* Negative urine cotinine test, defined as = 100 ng/mL
* Lung function tests: • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 70% Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) predicted
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Total daily insulin dose = 2 IU/kg/day. History of insulin pump use within 3 months of Screening or use of continuous glucose monitoring within 6 weeks of Screening
* History of inhaled insulin use in the previous 6 months
* Two or more unexplained severe hypoglycemic episodes within 3 months of Screening or an episode of severe hypoglycemia between Visit 1 and Visit 2. Unexplained refers to episodes of severe hypoglycemia that are not related to a dosing error, lack of or a change in meal size, or related to additional/unanticipated exercise
* Any hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control within 6 months of Screening, or hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control between Visit 1 and Visit 2
* Allergy or known hypersensitivity to insulin or to any of the drugs to be used in the study, or a history of hypersensitivity to TI Inhalation Powder or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
* History of recent blood transfusions (within previous 3 months), hemoglobinopathies, or any other conditions that affect HbA1c measurements.
* History of COPD, asthma, or any other clinically important pulmonary disease (eg, pulmonary fibrosis), or use of any medications for these conditions
* Any clinically significant radiological findings on screening chest x-ray
* Active respiratory infection within 30 days before Screening (subject may return after 30 days from resolution for rescreening)
* Major organ system diseases, including: ? Seizure disorder; systemic autoimmune or collagen vascular disease requiring previous or current treatment with systemic corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, or penicillamine; cancer (other than excised cutaneous basal cell carcinoma) or any history of lung neoplasms
* Current or previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy that may result in pulmonary toxicity; use of medications for weight loss (eg, sibutramine, orlistat) within 12 weeks of Screening; treatment with amiodarone within 12 weeks of Screening
* Clinically significant abnormalities on screening laboratory evaluation or chest x-ray
* Severe complications of diabetes, in the opinion of the PI, including symptomatic autonomic neuropathy; disabling peripheral neuropathy; active proliferative retinopathy; nephropathy with renal failure, renal transplant, or dialysis; nontraumatic amputations due to gangrene; or vascular claudication
* Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the clinical study period; women of childbearing potential (defined as premenopausal and not surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for fewer than 2 years) not practicing adequate birth control. Adequate birth control is defined as using oral, percutaneous, or transdermal contraceptives; condoms and diaphragms (double barrier) with a spermicide; or intrauterine devices. Postmenopausal for this study includes amenorrhea f
* Current drug or alcohol abuse or a history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject an unsuitable candidate for participation in the study
* Exposure to any investigational medications or devices within the previous 30 days before study entry
* Unable to read or write, or unlikely to comprehend and follow the study protocol procedures; lack of compliance with medication or procedures that, in the PI's opinion, may affect the study data or subject safety and that precludes the subject from participation in the study; or any other concurrent medical or major psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the PI, makes the subject unsuitable for the clinical study or could limit the validity of the informed consent or impair the subject'
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mannkind Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Burlingame, California, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Gatos, California, United States

Site Status

San Mateo, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Vincennes, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Paramus, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bartlett, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Federal Way, Washington, United States

Site Status

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Wenatchee, Washington, United States

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Moscow, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, RUS, Russia

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, UKR, Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Brazil Russia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Seaquist ER, Blonde L, McGill JB, Heller SR, Kendall DM, Bumpass JB, Pompilio FM, Grant ML. Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled Technosphere(R) Insulin relative to insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2020 May;37(5):752-759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14202. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31811662 (View on PubMed)

Bode BW, McGill JB, Lorber DL, Gross JL, Chang PC, Bregman DB; Affinity 1 Study Group. Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared With Injected Prandial Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized 24-Week Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2266-73. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0075. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26180109 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MKC-TI-171

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.