Alternative Dosing Strategy of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Myelofibrosis
NCT ID: NCT01445769
Last Updated: 2019-03-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Participants With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post Essential Thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis and Post Polycythemia Vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
NCT01348490
A Clinical Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PM), Post-polycythemia Vera (PV) Myelofibrosis, or Post-essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis
NCT02087059
Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of INCB018424 in Patients With Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia
NCT00726232
Fostamatinib as a Single Agent or in Combination With Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Patients With Myelofibrosis With Severe Thrombocytopenia
NCT04543279
Ruxolitinib in Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera
NCT04644211
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ruxolitinib
Participants initially received ruxolitinib 10 mg twice a day (bid) for 24 weeks. Dose increases of 5 mg bid were possible at Weeks 12 and 18 up to a maximum dose of 20 mg bid.
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was provided as 5 mg tablets. Dose increases were only permitted at wks 12 \& 18 for lack of efficacy. Increases were restricted to patients who didn't meet criteria for a dose hold over the prior 6 wks, had a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L at wk 12 or ≥ 150 x 10\^9/L at wk 18, and had a self-reported PGIC score of 3 (minimally improved) to 7 (very much worse) OR the subject's palpable spleen length below the costal margin was reduced by less than 40% relative to Baseline. Dose increases were elective and not required. Subjects were permitted a dose increase of 5 mg BID to 15 mg BID at wk 12 and to a maximum of 20 mg BID at wk 18. The protocol required dose decreases for thrombocytopenia (platelets \<100 x 10\^9/L) or protocol-defined anemia (decline in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dL to a level \< 8 g/dL, development of transfusion dependence, or a 50% increase in transfusion requirements for transfusion dependent subjects).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was provided as 5 mg tablets. Dose increases were only permitted at wks 12 \& 18 for lack of efficacy. Increases were restricted to patients who didn't meet criteria for a dose hold over the prior 6 wks, had a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L at wk 12 or ≥ 150 x 10\^9/L at wk 18, and had a self-reported PGIC score of 3 (minimally improved) to 7 (very much worse) OR the subject's palpable spleen length below the costal margin was reduced by less than 40% relative to Baseline. Dose increases were elective and not required. Subjects were permitted a dose increase of 5 mg BID to 15 mg BID at wk 12 and to a maximum of 20 mg BID at wk 18. The protocol required dose decreases for thrombocytopenia (platelets \<100 x 10\^9/L) or protocol-defined anemia (decline in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dL to a level \< 8 g/dL, development of transfusion dependence, or a 50% increase in transfusion requirements for transfusion dependent subjects).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must score at least 2 points on the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) scale for prognostic risk factors.
* Peripheral blast count \< 5% at both Screening and Baseline hematology assessments.
* Must discontinue all drugs used to treat underlying myelofibrosis (MF) disease no later than Day -1 (the day prior to starting ruxolitinib).
* Must have hemoglobin value ≥ 6.5 g/dL and be willing to receive blood transfusions.
* Platelet count ≥ 100\*10\^9/L.
* Must have a palpable spleen.
Exclusion Criteria
* Invasive malignancies over the previous 5 years (except treated early stage carcinomas of the skin, completely resected intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix, and completely resected papillary thyroid and follicular thyroid cancers).
* Splenic irradiation within 6 months prior to receiving the first dose of study medication.
* Life expectancy less than 6 months.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Incyte Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William V Williams, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Incyte Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Highland, California, United States
La Jolla, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Orange City, Florida, United States
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Armonk, New York, United States
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Canton, Ohio, United States
Hazleton, Pennsylvania, United States
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Talpaz M, Erickson-Viitanen S, Hou K, Hamburg S, Baer MR. Evaluation of an alternative ruxolitinib dosing regimen in patients with myelofibrosis: an open-label phase 2 study. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Aug 7;11(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0642-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18424-261
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.