Determination of Effective Vitamin D Replacement and Monitoring Strategies in Vitamin D Deficiency State
NCT ID: NCT01430793
Last Updated: 2014-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
99 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will be conducted at the out-patient Endocrinology Clinics of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. All patients seen in endocrine clinics with Vitamin D level less than 20 ng and do not have any of exclusion criteria mentioned below will be eligible for recruitment in the study. The study participants will be randomly assigned into 4 groups for intervention to receive intramuscular or oral Vitamin D in 200,000 or 600,000 units as per group allocation. Each group will comprise of 25 participants.
Group 1: Vitamin D3 600,000 units IM and then every 2 monthly for 2 times if levels remain \< 30 ng/ml.
Group 2: Vitamin D3 600,000 units orally and then every 2 monthly for 2 times if levels remain \< 30 ng/ml.
Group 3: Vitamin D3 200,000 units IM initially and then every 2 monthly for 2 months if levels remain \< 30 ng/ml.
Group 4: Vitamin D3 200,000 units orally initially and then every 2 monthly for 2 times if levels remain \< 30 ng/ml.
All patients will be prescribed elemental Calcium 1 gram /day. Vitamin D levels along with the other biochemical parameter and random urine for calcium \& creatinine will be checked at 00, 02, 04, 06 and 12 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Practices of Vitamin D Supplementation Leading to Vitamin D Toxicity
NCT05139576
Assessment of Dose Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy- a Dose Comparison Trial
NCT02215213
The Effect of Vitamin D3 Therapy in Post Menopausal Women and Assessment of Changes in Bone Mineral Density After Orally Vitamin D3 Administration
NCT05389943
Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Health and Well-being of Vitamin D Deficient UAE Citizens
NCT02662491
Vitamin D Replacement in Insulin Resistant South Asians
NCT01385345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are several areas of controversy which has great relevance for the investigators community like what level of vitamin D should be considered as deficiency, what are the daily requirements of vitamin D and how VDD should be corrected. Generally level below 20ng/ml is considered deficient and levels between 21 and 29 ng/ml is considered relative insufficiency as depicted by intestinal calcium absorption and nadir levels of parathyroid hormone.
Determination of the daily intake required to attain adequate serum 25(OH)D concentrations are compounded by the wide variability in the dose-response curve and basal 25(OH)D concentrations.
There is no universally accepted method of correcting VDD, In US the available preparation is 50,000 units of ergocalciferol, given weekly or three times per week for total of 300,000 units. Several strategies has recently been studied, a study from southern Brazil demonstrated that a single 300 000 IU oral dose of vitamin D3 was more effective than 800 IU per day to increase serum 25(OH)D levels in elderly persons, living in a low-income housing unit.
Contrary to this comparison of the equivalent oral doses of vitamin D3 600 IU/day, 4200 IU/week and 18,000 IU/month on vitamin D status showed that daily dose was more effective than a weekly dose, and a monthly dose was the least effective.
In India a recent study evaluated the common physician practice of prescribing 1500 mcg (60 000 IU) cholecalciferol per week for 8 weeks for VDD. Twenty-eight subjects with mean 25 hydoxy vitamin D level of 13.5 nmol/l received oral supplementation of 1500 mcg cholecalciferol per week and 1g elemental Ca daily for 8 weeks. At 8 weeks the vitamin deficiency was corrected in all patients with mean the mean 25(OH)D levels of 82.4 nmol/l however at 1 year follow up all subjects were again vitamin D deficient with the mean 25(OH)D level of 24.7 nmol/l. This suggests that ongoing supplementation after initial loading is needed for sustained improvement in 25(OH)D levels vitamin D levels.
In another study from Australia, a single annual intramuscular injection of 600,000 IU cholecalciferol was administered to 50 vitamin D-deficient participants. Specimens were collected at baseline and after 4 and 12 months of therapy. Serum 25OHD3 levels were significantly higher at 4 months (114 ±35 nmol/L), and 12 months (73 ±13nmol/L) compared with baseline (32 ±8nmol/L) (P \< 0.001), increasing by an average of 128% over the 12 months. The therapy was effective, with normalization of serum 25OHD levels and maintenance of a level well above 50nmol/L at 12 months.
In Pakistan oral vitamin D supplementations are available in only in combination with calcium supplement with maximum availability of 400 IU. Two depot intramuscular preparations are available one with 200,000 IU and other with 600,000 IU of vitamin D3. Regarding the 600,000 unit preparation the practices among physician are varied, common practice is to give 600,000 units intramuscularly every 03 months, some physicians prescribe a second injection after first month in cases of severe deficiency and some physicians prescribe 3 injections of Vitamin D at 2 weekly interval and then repeat in 3 months if needed. Regarding the 200,000 unit preparation, it is less commonly used, more expensive than the other preparation; however it has the advantage of using orally as well. There are no published guidelines with these mega doses of depot preparations. The effects of these mega doses have not been studied in the investigators setting and practices are based on individual experiences. The investigators strongly feel that information regarding effective correction of vitamin deficiency with currently available depot preparation is lacking and the investigators study will help in answering this very important and relevant clinical query.
The investigators second objective of the study is to find a cost effective method of monitoring adequacy of vitamin D replacement. While treatment with vitamin D is easy and inexpensive, monitoring of vitamin D levels is expensive, not widely available and assay limitations in terms of precision, accuracy and measurements of status of vitamin D.
The investigators planned to measure urinary calcium excretion as an index of adequacy of vitamin D status and to determine the correlation with vitamin D levels.
Urine calcium is a reflection of dietary intake, calcium absorption from gut, bone turnover, and renal excretion mechanisms. At steady-state excretion is usually approximately 30% of the dietary intake. The efficiency of the absorption of renal calcium and of intestinal calcium and phosphorus is increased in the presence of vitamin D. Reports show increase of intestinal calcium transport by 45 to 65% in women when 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were increased from an average of 20 to 32 ng per milliliter (50 to 80 nmol per liter).
Calciuria estimated by the calcium/creatinine ratio tended to increase in parallel with 25 OH vitamin D levels this is mostly studied in pediatric population given vitamin D for prophylaxis of rickets. In adult patients with hypercalciuria and renal stone formation positive correlation is seen with vitamin D and urinary calcium excretion. Seasonal variation in vitamin D levels and urinary calcium excretion has also been described. Gokce C et al find significant correlation between random single voided urine calcium-to-creatinine ratio and 24-hour total calcium excretion in 67 subjects who were selected prospectively to represent a wide range of renal and parathyroid function as well as urinary calcium and phosphate loss.
The investigators expect that this simple urine test can be followed to evaluate the vitamin D sufficiency state in post vitamin D treated patients and can serve as a cost effective mean of following these patients.
Objectives:
Primary Objective:
To determine the effect of vitamin D replacement on vitamin D levels with currently available preparations in patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Secondary objective:
To determine the correlation between vitamin D levels and urinary calcium excretion in deficiency and sufficiency states.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vitamin D 600,000 IM
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given by intramuscular injection
Vitamin D3 600,000 units IM
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given by Intramuscular injection and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if vitamin D levels remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D 600,000 orally
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given orally
Vitamin D3 600,000 Orally
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given orally and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if vitamin D levels remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D 200,000 IM
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given by intramuscular injection
Vitamin D3 200,000 units IM
Vitamin D3 200,000 units will be given by Intramuscular injection and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if level of vitamin D remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D 200,000 orally
Vitamin D 200,000 units will be given orally
Vitamin D3 200,000 Orally
Vitamin D3 200,000 units will be given by orally and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if level of vitamin D remain \< 30 ng/ml
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vitamin D3 600,000 units IM
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given by Intramuscular injection and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if vitamin D levels remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D3 600,000 Orally
Vitamin D3 600,000 units will be given orally and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if vitamin D levels remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D3 200,000 units IM
Vitamin D3 200,000 units will be given by Intramuscular injection and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if level of vitamin D remain \< 30 ng/ml
Vitamin D3 200,000 Orally
Vitamin D3 200,000 units will be given by orally and then will be repeated every 2 monthly for 2 times if level of vitamin D remain \< 30 ng/ml
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with hypercalcemia (corrected calcium \> 10.6 mg/dl)
* Known Malignancy.
* Known case of CLD or serum ALT \> 3 times ULN
* Patients with creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aga Khan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad Qamar Masood
Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Q Masood, MBBS; FACP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aga Khan University
Abdul Jabbar, MBBS; FRCP
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Aga Khan University
Aysha Habib, MBBS; FCPS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Aga Khan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Masood MQ, Khan A, Awan S, Dar F, Naz S, Naureen G, Saghir S, Jabbar A. COMPARISON OF VITAMIN D REPLACEMENT STRATEGIES WITH HIGH-DOSE INTRAMUSCULAR OR ORAL CHOLECALCIFEROL: A PROSPECTIVE INTERVENTION STUDY. Endocr Pract. 2015 Oct;21(10):1125-33. doi: 10.4158/EP15680.OR. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SM100404
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.