Does a Nutritional Supplement Increase Vitality, Energy and Perceived Well Being?
NCT ID: NCT01427426
Last Updated: 2014-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Clinical Study to Assess the Effect of a Supplement on Digestive Health, Overall Well-being, and Participant Experience.
NCT06283732
A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nutritional Supplement on Wellbeing and Nutrient Absorption
NCT06749808
Sleep and Morning Wellbeing Study
NCT07311434
Effects of a Vitality Dietary Supplement on Physical and Mental Function in Middle-aged Adults
NCT01155076
The Efficacy of Chlorella Supplementation on Health and Performance Following a 12-week Training Programme
NCT05639634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
HYPOTHESIS Our primary hypothesis is that a greater proportion of participants on All Greens will score higher on the subjective scores of vitality and energy, as measured by our validated survey, than those consuming the control formulation.
JUSTIFICATION All Greens is a mixture of organic alfalfa powder, barley, wheat grass juice powder, lycopene, cranberry juice extract, rosehips, grapeseed phytosomes, soya extract, Acidophilus, bromelain, apple pectin, and other ingredients. All Greens is a well-balanced phytonutrient formula that nourishes, energizes, cleanses and acts as a whole body tonic. Recently, Boon et al (2004) have published results demonstrating some clinical benefits of consuming Greens+, a product similar to All Greens. After 12 weeks, women randomized to consume Greens+ scored marginally higher on subjective scores on Vitality and significantly higher on Energy than those consuming a placebo group (Boon, 2004). However, limitations of this study such as incomplete blinding and a high drop-out rate limit the veracity of the findings.
OBJECTIVES To determine if 12 weeks of consumption of All Greens increases vitality, energy, and perception of well-being compared to consumption of a placebo in adult women and men (18-45 y).
RESEARCH METHOD The investigators aim to recruit 120 people (18-45 y) through advertisements and word of mouth. In a lead-in phase, subjects will be asked to consume an 'initiation drink' daily for a week. The purpose of this is to identify those subjects who are unlikely to complete the study so they can be excluded before randomization, in order to minimize the dropout rate. The lead-in product will be composed primarily of rice flour, with other ingredients added to make it comparable to the All Greens and control formulation.
Participants remaining after the week lead-in phase week will be asked to attend a morning clinic at the university. Height and weight will be recorded, health and demographic information will be collected by questionnaire, and outcome measure questionnaires will be completed. Participants will be randomized to All Greens or the control formulation. Subjects will be instructed to record any side effects or adverse events in a study diary. At 6 weeks, study staff will phone participants, to check on progress.
Twelve weeks after randomization, participants will be asked to return to clinic to repeat the outcome measure questionnaires. Compliance will be assessed by weighing returned supplements and by patient diary. Adverse events will be recorded in the diaries. If patients withdraw from the study they will still be encouraged to return at 12 weeks to complete the outcome measures to allow for intent-to-treat analysis.
SAMPLE SIZE The sample size estimate is based on the primary outcome. The mean score on the vitality subscale of the SF-36 in a large study of women was 65 with a SD of 18. A ten-point change in the SF-36 vitality sub-scale can be considered a "moderate" effect that is clinically and socially relevant. Assuming 80% power, P-value of 0.05, an SD of 18, a correlation between baseline and follow-up measures of at least R=0.5, 50 subjects per treatment group would be needed to detect a 5 point difference between the groups. Assuming 20% attrition 120 subjects randomized would be required.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Differences in outcomes measures at twelve weeks will be assessed by multiple regression analysis with adjustment for baseline values and other predetermined factors (i.e. last menstrual period, oral contraceptive use).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All Greens
Subjects will consume the All Greens product daily. Product is prepared by mixing with either water, juice or in a smoothie.
All Greens
All Greens is a mixture of organic alfalfa powder, barley, wheat grass juice powder, lycopene, cranberry juice extract, rosehips, grapeseed phytosomes, soya extract, Acidophilus, bromelain, apple pectin, and other ingredients. All Greens is approved by Health Canada and available to the public for purchase.
Control formulation
Subjects will consume a product of similar consistency and comparable taste that does not have the same healthy ingredients as the All Greens.
Control Formulation
The Control Formulation is a rice-flour based product that has been designed to mimic the All Greens in appearance and taste.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
All Greens
All Greens is a mixture of organic alfalfa powder, barley, wheat grass juice powder, lycopene, cranberry juice extract, rosehips, grapeseed phytosomes, soya extract, Acidophilus, bromelain, apple pectin, and other ingredients. All Greens is approved by Health Canada and available to the public for purchase.
Control Formulation
The Control Formulation is a rice-flour based product that has been designed to mimic the All Greens in appearance and taste.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Currently taking antidepressants, anticoagulant or other medications that may interact with the nutritional supplement.
* Unable to provide informed consent
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Factors Group of Nutritional Companies Inc.
INDUSTRY
QualityMetrics
INDUSTRY
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Timothy J Green, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia, Department of Food, Nutrition and Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boon H, Clitheroe J, Forte T. Effects of greens+: a randomized, controlled trial. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2004 Summer;65(2):66-71. doi: 10.3148/65.2.2004.66.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H11-00426
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.