Predictors of Post Operative Outcome in Peripheral Vascular Surgical Patients

NCT ID: NCT01417910

Last Updated: 2016-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Over 3000 people each year undergo bypass operations to their lower limbs, and these operations carry significant risks with approximately 1 in 20 of these people dying in hospital, and another 1 in 20 having a heart attack.

Assessment of these patients in order to stratify their risk of both dying and having significant complications aid in improving their care, enable better utilisation of scarce critical care resources, and allow us to give patients better information on which to base consent.

Aims The aims of the project are to assess the feasibility of exercise testing this group of patients both with cycle and arm exercise, and to identify markers of outcome in this group.

Methodology This is a prospective observational study designed to test the hypothesis that a combination of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and blood tests provides prognostic value on outcome measures after surgery for lower limb revascularisation

Subjects will have 2 exercise tests, one arm and one cycle, prior to surgery at their preoperative assessment appointment. From these tests we will measure how much work patients can do, how much oxygen they are able to use, and when the heart is unable to deliver enough oxygen to the cells. In addition they will have blood samples taken prior to the operation (brain natriuretic peptide), and on days 1 and 3 (troponin I) after the operation to look at cardiac markers of damage.

This data will be used to see if we can predict those patients that have both short and long term complications, and also to see whether the different forms of exercise testing are comparable, or if one type is superior.

Expected outcomes We expect that through a combination of exercise testing and blood test we will be able to identify patients at increased risk of complications after surgery. We also expect to find that arm exercise will be a more feasible and informative test that cycle exercise.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Over 3000 people each year undergo bypass operations to their lower limbs, and these operations carry significant risks with approximately 1 in 20 of these people dying in hospital, and another 1 in 20 having a heart attack. The number of people having this type of procedure has grown over recent years and the trend is predicted to continue. Due to this significant increase in the volume of these patients, and the associated complications that occur with this surgery, utilisation of more resources such as critical care is often needed.

Assessment of these patients in order to stratify their risk of both dying and having significant complications aid in improving their care, allow better utilisation of scarce critical care resources, and also allow us to provide patients with better information as part of the informed consent process.

A high risk group in major abdominal surgery can be identified through a simple exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test) that looks at how the body uses oxygen, and also through a blood test that look at a hormone secreted by the heart. Vascular surgical patients are at risk for the development of major cardiac complications in the postoperative period but a system for appropriate preoperative risk stratifications has yet to be achieved.

Aims The aims of the project are to assess the feasibility of exercise testing this group of patients both with cycle and arm exercise, and to identify markers of outcome in this group. Identification of markers that can predict how patients will fare after surgery will allow us to improve the informed consent process, utilise resources more effectively and efficiently and identify opportunities to attempt to modify outcomes.

Methodology This is a prospective observational study designed to test the hypothesis that a combination of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and blood tests provide prognostic value on outcome measures after surgery for lower limb revascularisation.

Participants will have 2 exercise tests, one arm and one cycle, prior to surgery at their preoperative assessment appointment. From these tests we will measure how much work patients can do, how much oxygen they are able to use, and when the heart is unable to deliver enough oxygen to the cells. In addition they will have blood samples taken prior to the operation (brain natriuretic peptide), and on days 1 and 3 (troponin I) after the operation to look at cardiac markers of damage.

This data will be used to see if we can predict those patients that have both short and long term complications, and also to see whether the different forms of exercise testing are comparable, or if one type is superior.

Expected outcomes We expect that through a combination of exercise testing and a blood test we will be able to identify patients at increased risk of complications after surgery. We also expect to find that arm exercise will be a more feasible and informative test that cycle exercise.

Implications Identification of a high risk group would allow appropriate strategies to be implemented to reduce risk, and allow better post-operative resource utilisation. This study will also allow a larger multicentre study to be adequately powered and constructed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peripheral vascular disease

Subjects who have peripheral vascular disease

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients undergoing elective and expedited infra inguinal peripheral revascularisation. Patients undergoing radiological assessment (angiography) and/or radiological intervention for peripheral vascular disease

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients refusing to participate in the study or unable to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon J Davies, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PVD10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.