Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study design: A randomised controlled multicentre intervention study.
Study population: Patients, aged 18 years and older, who require surgery for release of a scar contracture, are eligible for this study. In total 50 patients will be recruited with a follow-up of 3 months post-operatively.
Intervention: A release of the contracture will be performed in combination with òr the standard technique (full thickness graft) òr the perforator based interposition plasty.
Main study parameters/endpoints: the main study parameter is the amount of contraction of the flap/graft after three months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Technique of Skin Stretching for Acute Burn Treatment and Scar Reconstruction
NCT00609908
Study of Silicone Material Inserts To Treat Burn Scars
NCT03159182
Application of Cultured Autologous Keratinocytes for Burn Wound Healing
NCT00832156
Differential Pressure Distribution Orthosis by 3D Printing Process in the Treatment of Post-burn Hypertrophic Scarring
NCT06487910
Evaluation of the Product Properties of Individualized 3D-compression Garments to Treat Scars
NCT03664505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Scar contracture remains a considerable problem for the burned patient. The standard method of treatment is contracture release in combination with the application of a full or split thickness graft to close the defect. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of skin grafts is limited by scar contraction, which often necessitates additional reconstructions. Moreover, parts of the skin graft may be lost due to poor revascularisation or infection.
Since the discovery of perforator vessels, many types of new flaps can be harvested as long as it incorporates a perforator bundle (artery and vein). This flap design based on perforator vessels and local available skin, should lead to an increased flap survival and superior functional outcome. Based on this concept we developed and explored the possibility of an algorithm for treatment by means of a pilot study performed on 22 patients with a scar contracture. Results show a survival of all flaps of 100% and an expansion of the surface area by 16% after a follow up of at least 3 months. However the implications of the use of perforator based flaps for burn surgery by means of a RCT has yet to be determined.
Primary objective:
Is interpositioned skin of superior quality, as represented by less contraction with the use of the perforator based interposition flaps, compared to the gold standard (full thickness grafts), after 3 months, as measured by transparent sheet planimetry?
Secondary objectives:
* Survival of the flap/graft: i.e. measured by the amount of necrosis
* The quality of the scar: elasticity, colour, subjective scar evaluation
Inclusion criteria are:
* Indication for release of burn scar contracture
* Sufficient tissue for a perforator- based interposition flap (preferably normal skin)
* Able to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria are:
* Age \< 18 years
* Location: scars on the face and scalp
* Smoking (however, the patient is eligible if smoking is quit \> 3 weeks before the operation)
* Psychiatric disorders (if a loss to follow-up is anticipated)
* Language barrier
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Perforator based interposion flap
In our concept the flap is designed based on a selected perforator and locally available, preferably normal skin adjacent to the burn scar contracture. The flap consists of skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue. Based on the pre-operative defined perforator, the required length and width and the available preferable normal skin, a design for the perforator flap is made.
Perforator based interposition flap
The flap is designed based on a selected perforator and locally available, preferably normal skin adjacent to the burn scar contracture. The flap consists of skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue. Based on the pre-operative defined perforator, the required length and width and the available preferable normal skin, a design for the perforator flap is made.
Full thickness graft
Perforator based interposition flap
The flap is designed based on a selected perforator and locally available, preferably normal skin adjacent to the burn scar contracture. The flap consists of skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue. Based on the pre-operative defined perforator, the required length and width and the available preferable normal skin, a design for the perforator flap is made.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perforator based interposition flap
The flap is designed based on a selected perforator and locally available, preferably normal skin adjacent to the burn scar contracture. The flap consists of skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue. Based on the pre-operative defined perforator, the required length and width and the available preferable normal skin, a design for the perforator flap is made.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sufficient tissue for a perforator- based interposition flap (preferably normal skin)
* Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Location: scars on the face and scalp
* Smoking (however, the patient is eligible if smoking is quit \> 3 weeks before the operation)
* Psychiatric disorders (if a loss to follow-up is anticipated)
* Language barrier
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Association of Dutch Burn Centres
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Association of Dutch Burn Centres
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul P M Van Zuijlen, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Red Cross Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Red Cross Hospital
Beverwijk, North Holland, Netherlands
Maastad Hospital
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Martini Hospital, Burns centre
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10104 and 10110
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.