Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Rufinamide in Pediatric Subjects 1 to Less Than 4 Years of Age With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Inadequately Controlled With Other Anti-epileptic Drugs (NCT NCT01405053)
NCT ID: NCT01405053
Last Updated: 2019-08-06
Results Overview
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
37 participants
End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
2019-08-06
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 19 investigative sites in the United States, Canada, France, Greece, Italy, and Poland from 16 June 2011 to 02 November 2015.
A total of 43 participants were screened, out of which 37 participants were randomized and treated in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Rufinamide
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs). Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
25
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Rufinamide
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs). Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant choice
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Inadequate therapeutic effect
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Rufinamide in Pediatric Subjects 1 to Less Than 4 Years of Age With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Inadequately Controlled With Other Anti-epileptic Drugs
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=25 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=12 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
Total
n=37 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99 • n=93 Participants
|
29.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.85 • n=4 Participants
|
28.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for primary efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other approved add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had baseline and at least 1 postdose cognition measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=15 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=4 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problem T-scores at the End of 2-year Treatment Period
|
55.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.81
|
54.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for primary efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other approved add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had baseline and at least 1 postdose cognition measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Total Problem T-Scores at End of 2-year Treatment Period
Baseline
|
56.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.27
|
62.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Total Problem T-Scores at End of 2-year Treatment Period
Change at Week 106
|
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.72
|
-6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to the End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy assessment and at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. Participants who were evaluable at a given time point were included for this assessment.
Withdrawal from either rufinamide or other AED was due to the occurrence of an adverse event or for lack of efficacy. Data was obtained till Week 106 and was extrapolated using Kaplan-Meier method to determine the overall survival time (in weeks) to withdrawal from treatment (excluding taper) due to an adverse event or lack efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=2 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=2 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Withdrawal From Treatment Due to an Adverse Event or Lack of Efficacy
|
142.0 weeks
NA: Lower and upper limits of 95% Confidence Interval could not be calculated since insufficient number of participants had withdrawal from treatment due to adverse event or lack of efficacy.
|
28.0 weeks
Interval 17.7 to
NA: Lower and upper limits of 95% Confidence Interval could not be calculated since insufficient number of participants had withdrawal from treatment due to adverse event or lack of efficacy.
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy assessment and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
The frequency per 28 days was defined as (S/D)\*28 where, S was equal to the sum of the seizures reported in the participant seizure diary during the specified time interval and D was equal to the number of days with non-missing data in the participant seizure diary for the specified study phase. The number of seizures was assessed and recorded by the participant's parent(s)/caregiver(s) in the participant seizure diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=8 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Total Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days
|
-7.05 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -79.2 to 3644.1
|
-20.15 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -83.3 to 143.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy assessment and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
The frequency per 28 days was defined as (S/D)\*28 where, S was equal to the sum of the seizures reported in the participant seizure diary during the specified time interval and D was equal to the number of days with non-missing data in the participant seizure diary for the specified study phase. The number of seizures was assessed and recorded by the participant's parent(s)/caregiver(s) in the participant seizure diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Partial seizures
|
-39.8 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 52281.9
|
-57.65 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -98.1 to -17.2
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Absence seizures
|
-23.6 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 86.8
|
-49.70 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -98.9 to 1846.7
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Atypical absence seizures
|
-70.95 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 16825.4
|
4.90 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -90.9 to 1189.7
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Myoclonic seizures
|
-24.60 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -73.3 to 11462.4
|
-27.90 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -60.9 to 130.2
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Clonic seizures
|
-60.85 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 140.4
|
-48.35 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -54.2 to -42.5
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Tonic-atonic seizures
|
-35.20 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 1250.6
|
-31.80 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -81.9 to -4.0
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures
|
-97.80 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 37.6
|
-96.60 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -96.6 to -96.6
|
|
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Other seizures
|
-90.65 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to 183.8
|
-100.00 percent change in seizure frequency
Interval -100.0 to -54.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy assessment and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment.
Worsening of seizures was summarized by the incidence of participants with doubling in total seizure frequency, doubling in frequency of major seizures (generalized tonic-clonic, drop attacks), or occurrence of new seizure type during each successive 3 to 4 month visit interval of the Maintenance Period relative to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Worsening of Seizures
Doubling in total seizure frequency
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Incidence of Worsening of Seizures
Doubling in frequency of major seizures
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Incidence of Worsening of Seizures
Occurrence of a new seizure type
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 106Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other approved add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire, measures behavioral problems/developmental delays, answered by parent/guardian/caregiver. Each item rated on 3-point scale (0=Not True,1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very/Often True). 99 items were combined to give scores for 8 problem area scales, where 1 for each 8 syndrome (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic, withdrawn, sleep, attention, aggressive behavior, and other problems) were calculated, range: 0 (normal) to 16 (clinical behavior) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). All 3 summary scores reported scaled to T-scores. Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw score were converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and SD of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total emotional reactive scores
|
59.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.13
|
60.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total emotional reactive scores
|
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.30
|
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total anxious/depression scores
|
56.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.48
|
54.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total anxious/depression scores
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.87
|
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total Somatic Complaints Scores
|
59.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.13
|
54.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total Somatic Complaints Scores
|
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.24
|
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total withdrawn scores
|
71.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.72
|
72.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total withdrawn scores
|
-2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.22
|
-7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total Sleep Problems Scores
|
57.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.72
|
62.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total sleep problem scores
|
-1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.30
|
-5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total attention problems scores
|
59.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.17
|
65.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total attention problems scores
|
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
-7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total Aggressive Behavior Scores
|
52.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.01
|
58.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week106:Total aggressive behavior scores
|
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.26
|
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total internalizing scores
|
61.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.78
|
60.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total internalizing scores
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.73
|
-2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Baseline: Total externalizing scores
|
47.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.22
|
58.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in CBCL Sub Scores at Week 106
Change at Week 106:Total externalizing scores
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.07
|
-3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 56, 88, and 106Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other approved add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
LDS, a caregiver-administered survey consisted of 8-item questionnaire and vocabulary list of 310 words organized within 14 semantic categories. List contained high frequency words (e.g. more), less common words (e.g. hamburger), and lexical chunks (e.g. Sesame Street). Average LDS score, calculated by dividing total number of words across all valid phrases by number of phrases with greater than (\>) 0words; for participants with no words, average was 0. This value was compared to standardized chart to obtain percentile rating. LDS provided 2 scores: average phrase length (number of words/phrase) and number of endorsed vocabulary words. LDS phrase length was categorized into delay (less than or equal to \[\<=\] 20th percentile) and no delay (\>20th percentile). LDS vocabulary was categorized into delay(\<=15th percentile)and no delay(\>15th percentile). Both raw scores were used to provide 2 normative scores based on child's age in months. Higher scores indicated better language development.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Baseline: LDS average phrase length
|
0.3 words
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0 words
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 24: LDS average phrase length
|
0.2 words
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
0.7 words
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 56: LDS average phrase length
|
0.1 words
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
0.0 words
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 88: LDS average phrase length
|
0.1 words
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.0 words
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 106: LDS average phrase length
|
0.4 words
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
0.0 words
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Baseline:LDS Vocabulary Score
|
10.4 words
Standard Deviation 37.72
|
0.6 words
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 24:LDS Vocabulary Score
|
7.1 words
Standard Deviation 21.55
|
4.8 words
Standard Deviation 8.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 56:LDS Vocabulary Score
|
17.9 words
Standard Deviation 39.24
|
-0.40 words
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 88:LDS Vocabulary Score
|
25.4 words
Standard Deviation 49.87
|
0.0 words
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Language Development Survey (LDS) Scores During Maintenance Period
Change at Week 106:LDS Vocabulary Score
|
39.6 words
Standard Deviation 75.62
|
1.0 words
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 106Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy assessment and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
The QoLCE was a 76-item questionnaire designed specifically to measure quality of life in children with epilepsy. QOLCE consists of 16 quality of life subscales (14 multi-item and 2 single item). Each subscales had number of items or questions with responses as excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. They were changed to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as per instructions. Then changed on a scale of 100, where 1 is equal to (=) 0, 2=25, 3=50, 4=75, and 5=100. Items corresponding to each subscale were marked and there mean score was score of that subscale. The form was completed by a parent or caregiver who interacted with the child on a consistent, daily basis and took about 20 to 30 minutes to complete. The higher the score, the better the child's quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score of Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QoLCE) Scale
Baseline
|
50.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
49.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score of Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QoLCE) Scale
Week 106
|
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 106Population: The full analysis set for other efficacy variable included randomized participants who received rufinamide or any other approved add-on AED of the investigator's choice and had a baseline efficacy and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time period were included for assessment.
The QoLCE was a 76-item questionnaire designed specifically to measure quality of life in children with epilepsy. QOLCE consists of 16 quality of life subscales (14 multi-item and 2 single item). Each subscales had number of items or questions with responses as excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. They were changed to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as per instructions. Then changed on a scale of 100, where 1=0, 2=25, 3=50, 4=75, and 5=100. Items corresponding to each subscale were marked and there mean score was score of that subscale. The form was completed by a parent or caregiver who interacted with the child on a consistent, daily basis and took about 20 to 30 minutes to complete. The higher the score, the better the child's quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=24 Participants
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=9 Participants
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Physical restriction
|
50.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
49.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Energy/Fatigue
|
51.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
|
44.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Energy/Fatigue
|
-3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.22
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Attention/Concentration
|
49.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.14
|
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106:Attention/Concentration
|
-2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.31
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Memory
|
50.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.54
|
52.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Memory
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.18
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Language
|
49.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
53.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Language
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.63
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Other cognitive
|
48.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.32
|
53.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Other cognitive
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Depression
|
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.27
|
45.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Depression
|
-2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
|
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Anxiety
|
50.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.27
|
48.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Anxiety
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.12
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Control/Helplessness
|
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
47.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Control/Helplessness
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.90
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Self-esteem
|
50.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Self-esteem
|
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.48
|
-6.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Social interactions
|
49.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Social interactions
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Social activities
|
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.50
|
46.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Social activities
|
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Stigma
|
48.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.06
|
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Stigma
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.67
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Behavior
|
51.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.39
|
45.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Behavior
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.92
|
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: General-health
|
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
49.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: General health
|
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Baseline: Quality-of-life
|
49.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Quality-of-life
|
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.46
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sub-scores in QoLCE
Change at Week 106: Physical restriction
|
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.51
|
-6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
Adverse Events
Rufinamide
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Blindness
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis viral
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Encephalitis
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia influenzal
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalized tonic-clonic seizure
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
25.0%
3/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Rufinamide
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received rufinamide oral suspension as an add-on therapy to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. Participants underwent a 2 week Titration Period during which rufinamide dose was increased from 10 mg/kg/day in increments of 10 mg/kg/day every 3 days to 40 mg/kg/day and thereafter in increments of 5 mg/kg/day to the target maintenance dose of 45 mg/kg/day (all daily treatments were to be administered in 2 equally divided doses). Rufinamide dose reached at the end of the Titration period were to be maintained the same throughout the 104-week Maintenance Period. At the end of Maintenance Period, rufinamide dose should be tapered (as needed) over a period of 2 weeks.
|
Any Other Approved Antiepileptic Drug
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received any other approved AEDs of the investigator's choice, dosed according to the investigator's usual practice, added to the participant's existing regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. At the end of Maintenance Period, the AED comparator would be discontinued according to the investigator's usual practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
12.0%
3/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
20.0%
5/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
12.0%
3/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
25.0%
3/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
28.0%
7/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
25.0%
3/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchiolitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
12.0%
3/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
28.0%
7/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
33.3%
4/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
|
12.0%
3/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
16.0%
4/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
16.7%
2/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lower respiratory tract congestion
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
12.0%
3/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
0.00%
0/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis diaper
|
4.0%
1/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
8.0%
2/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lip injury
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative fever
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural nausea
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract congestion
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Stridor
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Circadian rhythm sleep disorder
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Strabismus correction
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
8.3%
1/12 • From Visit 1 up to 30 days after the last study visit, or until resolution, whichever came first (up to approximately Week 106)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place