Cluster Randomised Trial of Malaria RDTs Used by CHWs in Afghanistan
NCT ID: NCT01403350
Last Updated: 2022-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
2421 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomised Trial of Rapid Diagnostic Tests in the Diagnosis of Malaria in Tanzania
NCT00146796
Role and Effectiveness of Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Home-based Management of Malaria
NCT01048801
Trial of Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Rural Ghana
NCT00493922
Extended-dose Chloroquine (ECQ) for Resistant Falciparum Malaria Among Afghan Refugees in Pakistan
NCT01019408
Experimental Human Malaria Infection After Immunization With Plasmodium Falciparum Sporozoites Under Chloroquine Prophylaxis
NCT01236612
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT) for malaria could potentially provide the CHW with an easy and safe way of diagnosing malaria based on the presence or absence of parasites in the blood. However, use of tests is not straightforward. They need to be applied correctly, following a strict protocol, to be accurate. There is now much interest in widespread deployment of these tools which are recommended by the World Health Organisation for all fever patients in malaria endemic areas. However, evidence for their effectiveness when used by CHWs is patchy and there are no randomised trials that have been conducted in Asia. Since they represent a considerable cost, examination of their effectiveness is required.
In Asia (unlike most of Africa), malaria is caused by two species - Plasmodium vivax accounts for the majority of cases and P. falciparum for the minority. Treatments differ between the species because of differing drug resistance patterns. Therefore accurate diagnosis is important for providing accurate treatment for the different types of malaria and also for treatment of cases of fever who do not have malaria with alternative treatments. In areas where health services are restricted by short opening hours, insecurity, or inaccessibility due to distance or terrain, the CHW should be able to use RDTs and apply the correct treatment for both a positive and a negative test at the village level.
This study will randomise 22 clinics (and their constituent CHWs) to receive either an RDT for use by the CHW in diagnosing malaria in patients with fever, or no intervention (the current situation) where CHWs base their treatment decisions on symptoms alone (i.e. there is no parasite based diagnosis). The RDT group will be given the standard national training for use of RDTs and management of malaria and the standard supplies. The non-RDT arm will have training on management of malaria and a short introduction to RDTs. The study will measure the accuracy of treatment applied by the CHW in the RDT vs. the non-RDT arms, and examine the accuracy of the RDT itself when it is applied in the field under operational conditions. The accuracy will be measured by collecting filter paper blood spots from the patients which will be tested by PCR for malaria. A variety of comparisons will be made between the two groups, but the main aim is to measure and difference in accurate treatment of the patients according to the reference (PCR) diagnosis.
In phase II of the study the non-RDT arm will be discontinued and the clinics will be re-randomised to different interventions. One group of clinics will have the standard RDT roll out continued, as previously, and the second group will get additional training and a range of supportive interventions to assist in their practice. The second phase will use the same methods of assessing the study outcomes. The aim of the second phase is to see whether additional training (and cost) results in improved practice by CHWs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Current Practice
Study Phase I: No RDT or other parasite based diagnosis; Study Phase II: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention Arm
Study Phase I: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support; Study Phase II: RDTs deployed with additional programme components including improved training and supportive interventions
Malaria Rapid Diagnostic test
Study Phase I: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support; Study Phase II: RDTs deployed with additional programme components including improved training and supportive interventions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Malaria Rapid Diagnostic test
Study Phase I: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support; Study Phase II: RDTs deployed with additional programme components including improved training and supportive interventions
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
\* \*any community health worker who consults with patients and prescribes treatment, and is administratively attached to one of the study clinics.
* Patient, or parent/guardian, gives informed consent to the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients referred on for diagnosis in the private sector.
* Patients who have signs of severe or complicated disease and are referred prior to giving any diagnosis using the interventions.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Health Protection and Research Organisation
UNKNOWN
HealthNet TPO
OTHER
Medical Emergency Relief International
UNKNOWN
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Toby Leslie, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HealthNet TPO
Jalalabad, Nangarhar, Afghanistan
Health Protection and Research Organisation
Kabul, , Afghanistan
Merlin
Kunduz, , Afghanistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leslie T, Rowland M, Mikhail A, Cundill B, Willey B, Alokozai A, Mayan I, Hasanzai A, Baktash SH, Mohammed N, Wood M, Rahimi HU, Laurent B, Buhler C, Whitty CJM. Use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests by community health workers in Afghanistan: cluster randomised trial. BMC Med. 2017 Jul 7;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0891-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5911
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.