Acupuncture as an Adjunctive Therapy to the Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Chronic Pain in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Three Armed Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT01398930
Last Updated: 2011-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2008-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Semi-standarized Acupuncture in Chronical Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee Through: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05096806
Acupuncture in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT00325663
Multi-center Clinical Research of Acupuncture Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02948218
Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis
NCT00035399
Acupuncture Safety/Efficacy in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT00010946
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To be eligible for the study, patients must have met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Patients must also have had a Kellgren-Lawrence (radiologic criterion) score of at least 2 and chronic pain in the knee joint for longer than 3 months. After being fully informed of the study's aims, all participants provided written consent abiding with the declaration of Helsinki. Ineligible patients included those who had received intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronate injection during the last 3 months, corticosteroids, antiplatelet drugs (apart from acetylsalicylic acid 100mg), or immunosuppressive drugs. Patients who were pregnant, or who had suffered from a malignancy of any kind, psychiatric disease, stroke, heart attack, kidney failure, active gastric or duodenal ulcer, or gastrorrhagia were also excluded. Finally patients who had previous treatment with acupuncture, other forms of arthritis, or who had arthroplasty during the last year were also ineligible for the study.
After screening, patients meeting the participation criteria were asked for informed consent, and were randomly assigned to 3 different groups: Group I was assigned to treatment with etoricoxib alone, Group II was assigned to treatment with acupuncture and etoricoxib, and Group III was assigned to treatment with sham acupuncture and etoricoxib. Baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) values, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and SF-36v2 health survey (for quality of life) parameters were recorded. Baseline body mass index (BMI), complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Rheumatoid (Rh) Factor type, kidney and liver function tests, uric acid levels, and arterial blood pressure were recorded and followed throughout the study. Finally, a unique tender point around the knee, was found for each patient and was marked and photographed. A Pain Test™ FDK 20 Algometer was used to score the pain throughout the study using this predetermined tender point. During follow-up, the doctor performing the acupuncture was the only one who was aware of the group each patient belonged to. This physician did not perform randomization or any patient evaluations or statistical analysis.
Randomization Eligible patients were randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups. In order to ensure similar treatment numbers, blocked randomization was used. Blocks of 3 patients were allocated to the 3 treatment groups and a random, computer generated sequence was assigned to each block.
Interventions
Group I (Pharmacological) All patients received 60-mg etoricoxib tablets once-daily for 60 days.
Groups II and III (Acupuncture) A doctor specializing in acupuncture (accredited by the International Council of Medical Acupuncture and Related Techniques \[ICMART\] and the Medical Acupuncture Society of Northern Greece) selected the acupuncture points that would be effective for osteoarthritis of the knee according to traditional treatment methods.
The protocol for acupuncture was to insert single use, sterile, 30 mm long and 30 gauge acupuncture needles into the local points ST36, SP9, SP10, GB34, Ex-LE 2, and Ex-LE5 as well as the distal points Li4, Ki3, ST40, and SP6. At each point, the patient confirmed the De Qi sensation (a feeling that indicates effective needling). This treatment was given biweekly for 8 weeks. Starting from the third session, the ES - 160 electrostimulator ITO co. (2-6Hz, 150 ms for 20 minutes) was used to stimulate the needles in pairs ST36-SP9 and GB34-SP10.
Sham acupuncture was administrated at the same duration and frequency by the same specialist who performed the non-sham acupuncture. Retractable needles were placed into small adhesive cylinders, so that the needles were supported but did not perforate the skin \[30\]. The acupuncturist placed the needles at the same points as the non-sham group and used the same pairs of electrodes to simulate the electrical connection.
All patients were instructed to check their arterial blood pressure daily. Patients with risk factors for upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract complications received proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
All patients completed standard questionnaires at baseline, and after 4, 8 (final treatment week), and 12 weeks.
An examination for possible side effects of both acupuncture and pharmacological treatment was performed at each visit. These side effects included gastrointestinal tract complications, blood pressure increases, and haematomas at the acupuncture point.
The scale for the primary endpoint was the WOMAC index Version VA3.1 and its three subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function) at the end of treatment, week 8. Additional outcome measures were the WOMAC scales at weeks 4 and 12, VAS (0-100) \[26,12\] at weeks 4, 8 and 12, and the Greek version of SF-36v2 Health Survey with its two components (physical-mental) for assessment, of health related quality of life at the end of week 8. The score from the direct measurement of pain at the predetermined unique trigger point was measured with the Pain Test™ FDK 20 Algometer of Warner USA at the end of weeks 4, 8, and 12. In cases of bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee, the most painful knee at baseline was assessed throughout the study.
Statistical Analyses Descriptive statistics like the mean ± standard deviation (SD), median, minimum (min) and maximum (max) are used to present continuous variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 tests and are reported as frequencies or percentages.
For multiple group comparisons, the one-way ANOVA test was used to determine statistically significant differences between groups of variables with data that were normal distributed, while the Kruskal Wallis test was used for groups with data that were not normally distributed. Post hoc tests were performed only for statistically significant group differences. Paired t-tests (or Wilcoxon tests when appropriate) were performed in order to assess differences between different time points in the same group. Data analysis was performed using the statistical package SPSS v 15.0
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I was treated with etoricoxib
acupuncture
This is a 3-armed single-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial, comparing acupuncture along with pharmacological treatment, sham acupuncture including pharmacological treatment, and pharmacological treatment alone.
Group II was treated with acupuncture and etoricoxib
acupuncture
This is a 3-armed single-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial, comparing acupuncture along with pharmacological treatment, sham acupuncture including pharmacological treatment, and pharmacological treatment alone.
Group III was treated with sham acupuncture and etoricoxib.
acupuncture
This is a 3-armed single-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial, comparing acupuncture along with pharmacological treatment, sham acupuncture including pharmacological treatment, and pharmacological treatment alone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
acupuncture
This is a 3-armed single-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial, comparing acupuncture along with pharmacological treatment, sham acupuncture including pharmacological treatment, and pharmacological treatment alone.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Kellgren-Lawrence (radiologic criterion) score of at least 2
* chronic pain in the knee joint for longer than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* corticosteroids
* antiplatelet drugs (apart from acetylsalicylic acid 100mg)
* immunosuppressive drugs
* malignancy of any kind
* psychiatric disease
* stroke
* heart attack
* kidney failure
* active gastric or duodenal ulcer, or gastrorrhagia
* other forms of arthritis
* arthroplasty during the last year
* previous treatment with acupuncture
35 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National and Kapodistrian University Medical School
Athens, , Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, Linde K, Streng A, Wagenpfeil S, Hummelsberger J, Walther HU, Melchart D, Willich SN. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):136-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66871-7.
Berman BM, Singh BB, Lao L, Langenberg P, Li H, Hadhazy V, Bareta J, Hochberg M. A randomized trial of acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Apr;38(4):346-54. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.4.346.
Kwon YD, Pittler MH, Ernst E. Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Nov;45(11):1331-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel207. Epub 2006 Aug 27.
Melchart D, Weidenhammer W, Streng A, Reitmayr S, Hoppe A, Ernst E, Linde K. Prospective investigation of adverse effects of acupuncture in 97 733 patients. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 12;164(1):104-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.104. No abstract available.
Scharf HP, Mansmann U, Streitberger K, Witte S, Kramer J, Maier C, Trampisch HJ, Victor N. Acupuncture and knee osteoarthritis: a three-armed randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):12-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-1-200607040-00005.
White A, Foster NE, Cummings M, Barlas P. Acupuncture treatment for chronic knee pain: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Mar;46(3):384-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel413. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M-127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.