Dasatinib Added to Gemcitabine for Subjects With Locally-advanced Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01395017

Last Updated: 2016-04-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who receive dasatinib added to standard of care (gemcitabine) live longer, compared to patients who receive standard of care (gemcitabine) plus placebo; i.e. gemcitabine alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

One arm will receive standard of care treatment (ie, GEM 1000 mg/m2 by intravenous \[IV\] infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle) plus dasatinib 100 mg by mouth once daily (QD).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dasatinib

Intervention Type DRUG

GEM 1000 mg/m2 by intravenous \[IV\] infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus dasatinib 100 mg (or matched placebo) by mouth once daily (QD). Subjects will continue to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

Group 2

The other arm will receive standard of care treatment (ie, GEM 1000 mg/m2 by intravenous \[IV\] infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle) plus matched placebo by mouth once daily (QD).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dasatinib

GEM 1000 mg/m2 by intravenous \[IV\] infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus dasatinib 100 mg (or matched placebo) by mouth once daily (QD). Subjects will continue to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-354825

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologic or cytologic documentation of unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
* Recovery from toxicity of previous procedures to establish the diagnosis. ECOG PS 0 or 1.
* Adequate organ function.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of metastatic disease.
* Previous radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
* History of or current pleural effusion.
* History of significant cardiovascular disease.
* Clinically significant bleeding disorder or coagulopathy.
* Concomitant medication with strong CYP 3A4 inhibitor.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Footscray, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Site Status

Paris, Cedex 14, France

Site Status

Angers, Maine-et-Loire, France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region, France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Pécs, Baranya, Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Udine, UD, Italy

Site Status

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Jelenia Góra, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Site Status

Craiova, Dolj, Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Voronezh, , Russia

Site Status

Hull, East Yorks, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salisbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia France Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Poland Romania Russia United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

287-11-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.