Allopurinol Outcome Study

NCT ID: NCT01391325

Last Updated: 2014-06-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1735 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study of allopurinol in gout patients with hyperuricemia that will evaluate the safety and serum urate (sUA) lowering capability of allopurinol as a urate lowering therapy (ULT) for up to six months. Allopurinol will be dosed according to the local product label, at the discretion of the Investigator, to achieve an optimal, medically appropriate dose for each patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gout

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Allopurinol

Treatment.

Group Type OTHER

Allopurinol

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially available allopurinol 100 mg and 300 mg oral tablets will be prescribed by the Investigator according to the approved product label.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Allopurinol

Commercially available allopurinol 100 mg and 300 mg oral tablets will be prescribed by the Investigator according to the approved product label.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meets the diagnosis of gout according to the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria for the Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout.
* Not on a urate lowering therapy (ULT) must have an sUA level ≥ 8.0 mg/dL at screening.
* If on concomitant ULT must have an sUA level ≥ 6.5 mg/dL at screening.
* Must have had at least 2 gout flares in the past year.

Exclusion Criteria

* Consumption of more than 14 drinks of alcohol per week (eg, 1 drink = 5 oz \[150 mL\] of wine, 12 oz \[360 mL\] of beer, or 1.5 oz \[45 mL\] of hard liquor).
* History or suspicion of drug abuse.
* History of autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment.
* Known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C antibody (HCV), or hepatitis B antibody (HBsAg) infection.
* History of malignancy within the previous 5 years (with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence, treated cervical dysplasia or treated in situ Grade 1 cervical cancer).
* Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure, or stroke within the last 12 months.
* Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure above 160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure above 95 mm Hg).
* Estimated creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min by Cockcroft-Gault formula.
* Kidney or other organ transplant.
* Active peptic ulcer disease requiring treatment.
* History of xanthinuria, active liver disease, or hepatic dysfunction.
* If unable to take gout flare prophylaxis of either colchicine or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) due to contraindication (e.g. toxicity, renal function, use of contraindicated medications).
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to allopurinol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

S Baumgartner, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Bringham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Calera, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandlers, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Ramon, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Weslake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Brandenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

East Brandenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oldsmar, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sanford, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hyannis, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

South Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Hartsdale, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Spring Hill, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Port Orchard, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Birsbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Daw Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Woodville South, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

North Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Malvern East, , Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Gozée, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Mouscron, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Penticton, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Altenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Eichstätt, , Germany

Site Status

Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Papatoetoe, , New Zealand

Site Status

Rotorua, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

East London, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Paarl, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Rondebosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Stellenbosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Thabazimbi, , South Africa

Site Status

Worcester, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Germany New Zealand South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Topless R, Noorbaloochi S, Merriman TR, Singh JA. Change in serum urate level with urate-lowering therapy initiation associates in the immediate term with patient-reported outcomes in people with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Oct;56:152057. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152057. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35835008 (View on PubMed)

Becker MA, Fitz-Patrick D, Choi HK, Dalbeth N, Storgard C, Cravets M, Baumgartner S. An open-label, 6-month study of allopurinol safety in gout: The LASSO study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26190562 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ALLO-401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.