Tetracaine Versus Lidocaine Gel for Anesthetic Effect and Comfort in Patients Undergoing LASIK
NCT ID: NCT01383200
Last Updated: 2017-08-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\*Of note- the randomization being done is for which eye will be receiving the lidocaine and which eye will be receiving the tetracaine. Each patient will receive lidocaine in 1 eye and tetracaine in the other eye, the randomization is for each individual eye. This means, of 11 patients in our study, 22 eyes received treatment. 11 eyes received lidocaine and 11 eyes received tetracaine.
when we did our comparison, 11 values were used for lidocaine and 11 eyes were used for tetracaine, giving a total of 22 eyes. This is important to note since the randomization refers to EYE for each individual patient, and not for the patient (ie: participant means 1 eye, not 1 person in the descriptions below).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Tetracaine 0.5% and Lidocaine 2% Jelly for Topical Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
NCT00827073
Comparison of Patient Comfort After Two Anesthetic Protocols for Injections Into the Eye
NCT01087489
Comparison Between 2% Lidocaine Gel and 5% Tetracaine Eye Drop as Topical Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification
NCT03143452
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Intracameral Injection of T2380 in Cataract Surgery
NCT02101359
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Povidone-iodine in Reducing Conjunctival Bacterial Load Prior to Cataract Surgery in Patients Treated With a Lidocaine Gel Dilating Formulation Versus Eye Drops: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01898728
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tetracaine R/Lidocaine L
Participant's Right or Left eye will receive 0.5% Tetracaine drop, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.
Tetracaine drop
0.5% Tetracaine Right eye / 2% Lidocaine Left eye
Lidocaine gel
0.5% Tetracaine Left eye / 2% Lidocaine Right eye
Tetracaine L/Lidocaine R
Participant's Right or Left eye will receive 2% lidocaine gel, at 10 minutes and 5 minutes, prior to LASIK.
Tetracaine drop
0.5% Tetracaine Right eye / 2% Lidocaine Left eye
Lidocaine gel
0.5% Tetracaine Left eye / 2% Lidocaine Right eye
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tetracaine drop
0.5% Tetracaine Right eye / 2% Lidocaine Left eye
Lidocaine gel
0.5% Tetracaine Left eye / 2% Lidocaine Right eye
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* prior ocular surgery
* active facial injuries
* any active current ophthalmological disease
* history of diabetes
* any current non- Over The Counter pain medication
* inability to complete the questionnaire.
* Economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, Prisoners, or Children
* Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
* Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Miami
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sonia Yoo
PROFESSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SONIA YOO, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Miami
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shah NV, Vaddavalli PK, Chow JH, Roman JS, Shi W, Yoo SH. Prospective, double-masked, randomized trial comparing lidocaine gel to tetracaine drops in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;28(10):671-2. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121001-05. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20101016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.