Comparison of Patient Comfort After Two Anesthetic Protocols for Injections Into the Eye

NCT ID: NCT01087489

Last Updated: 2012-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient comfort during and after eye injections will be compared after two numbing (anesthetic) protocols, an eye preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine drops versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary goal of this investigation is to determine the relative comfort of an intravitreal injection (same day and the next day) after a preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel. Based on the available data, the researchers contend that a preparation based on viscous 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel, which coats the surface and remains in contact with the eye longer, may provide greater anesthesia and result in greater patient comfort than the topical 4% lidocaine, which is part of the standard preparation routinely utilized in the ophthalmology department currently. Secondary outcome measure is the intraocular pressure rise after the injection, and the authors will generate prospective data to study whether softening the eye with cotton swabs prior to the injection lowers post-injection pressure spike.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pain discomfort anesthetic drugs topical drug administration injections, intraocular lidocaine intraocular pressure keratopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

4% lidocaine

Eyes were anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with three cotton swabs soaked in 4% liquid lidocaine applied with moderate pressure to the site of the injection inferotemporally to the limbus. Each participant was assigned to have this prep during one of the consecutive study visits if unilateral or in one eye if patient requires bilateral injections given the same day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

4% lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 4% lidocaine drops and a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface followed in three rounds by additional 5% povidone iodine and a sterile cotton swab soaked in sterile 4% lidocaine applied with gentle pressure to the area designated for injection in the infero-temporal quadrant.

3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel

Eye was anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel applied to the surface of the eye. Each participant was randomly assigned to receive this preparation during one of two consecutive intravitreal injection (if unilateral disease) or in one eye if requiring bilateral injections given on the same day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel

Intervention Type DRUG

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 5% povidone iodine will be placed over the eye. Two drops of preservative-free 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel will be placed into inferior conjunctival sac. The patient will be asked to close the eye for 7 minutes. Next, a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface and allowed to remain in contact with the eye for at least 2 minutes. The eye will then be rinsed with antibiotic drops.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

4% lidocaine

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 4% lidocaine drops and a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface followed in three rounds by additional 5% povidone iodine and a sterile cotton swab soaked in sterile 4% lidocaine applied with gentle pressure to the area designated for injection in the infero-temporal quadrant.

Intervention Type DRUG

3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel

The eye will be topically anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine drops and 5% povidone iodine will be placed over the eye. Two drops of preservative-free 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel will be placed into inferior conjunctival sac. The patient will be asked to close the eye for 7 minutes. Next, a 10% povidone-iodine scrub of the lids and lashes will be performed. A sterile speculum will be placed between the lids. Five percent povidone-iodine drops will then be applied over the ocular surface and allowed to remain in contact with the eye for at least 2 minutes. The eye will then be rinsed with antibiotic drops.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

lidocaine Akten

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has required repeat Ranibizumab injections and has had at least 3 injections prior to recruitment
* Informed consent
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Clinical need for a therapeutic ranibizumab intravitreal injection regardless of the medical indication
* Able to understand and read English

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
* Mental disability
* Prisoners
* Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
* Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures
* Previous reaction to the same drug class
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Miami VA Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ninel Gregori

Assistant Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ninel Gregori, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Miami VA Healthcare Systems

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Friedman SM, Margo CE. Topical gel vs subconjunctival lidocaine for intravitreous injection: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142(5):887-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17056383 (View on PubMed)

Caudle LE, Williams KA, Pesudovs K. The Eye Sensation Scale: an ophthalmic pain severity measure. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):752-62. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31812f7690.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17700338 (View on PubMed)

Chalam KV, Murthy RK, Agarwal S, Gupta SK, Grover S. Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug 17;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-9-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19686592 (View on PubMed)

Busbee BG, Alam A, Reichel E. Lidocaine hydrochloride gel for ocular anesthesia: results of a prospective, randomized study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008 Sep-Oct;39(5):386-90. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20080901-03.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18831420 (View on PubMed)

Page MA, Fraunfelder FW. Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel as a topical ocular anesthetic for use in ophthalmic procedures. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:601-9. doi: 10.2147/opth.s4935. Epub 2009 Nov 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19898665 (View on PubMed)

Soliman MM, Macky TA, Samir MK. Comparative clinical trial of topical anesthetic agents in cataract surgery: lidocaine 2% gel, bupivacaine 0.5% drops, and benoxinate 0.4% drops. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.034.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15313296 (View on PubMed)

Bardocci A, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Ciucci F, Manna L. Lidocaine 2% gel versus lidocaine 4% unpreserved drops for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):144-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01562-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12511360 (View on PubMed)

Cintra LP, Lucena LR, Da Silva JA, Costa RA, Scott IU, Jorge R. Comparative study of analgesic effectiveness using three different anesthetic techniques for intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009 Jan-Feb;40(1):13-8. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20090101-05.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19205490 (View on PubMed)

Kozak I, Cheng L, Freeman WR. Lidocaine gel anesthesia for intravitreal drug administration. Retina. 2005 Dec;25(8):994-8. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200512000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16340529 (View on PubMed)

Gregori NZ, Weiss MJ, Goldhardt R, Schiffman JC, Vega E, Mattis CA, Shi W, Kelley L, Hernandez V, Feuer WJ. Ocular decompression with cotton swabs lowers intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal injection. J Glaucoma. 2014 Oct-Nov;23(8):508-12. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318294865c.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23632408 (View on PubMed)

Gregori NZ, Weiss MJ, Goldhardt R, Schiffman JC, Vega E, Mattis CA, Shi W, Kelley L, Hernandez V, Feuer WJ. Randomized clinical trial of two anesthetic techniques for intravitreal injections: 4% liquid lidocaine on cotton swabs versus 3.5% lidocaine gel. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012 Jul;9(7):735-41. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2012.685155. Epub 2012 May 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22554019 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

00825

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id