Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally
NCT ID: NCT01380197
Last Updated: 2018-02-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-26
2016-10-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary hypothesis to be tested in this double blind, randomized controlled trial is that Nalbuphine is equivalent to morphine for pain control and patients will suffer fewer episodes of acute chest syndrome. The investigators also expect subjects will report fewer side effects from respiratory depression, abdominal distention from reduced peristalsis, reduced histamine release causing pruritis and still be provided adequate pain control. Further hypotheses to be tested is ability to recruit patient participants while being treated in the Emergency Department and that continuous infusion of Nalbuphine with accompanying patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is safe and effective in controlling pain, requiring less total opiates consumption, while decreasing length of hospitalization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of New Analgesic Strategy Compared to the Usal Antalgic Strategy
NCT00874172
Clonidine With Morphine in Patient Controlled Analgesia Pump in Vaso-Occlusive Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease Patient
NCT05848531
Comparing Acute Pain Management Protocols for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
NCT02222246
Analgesic Effect of Parecoxib Versus Morphine in SCD Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
NCT06315920
Vaporized Cannabis for Chronic Pain Associated With Sickle Cell Disease
NCT01771731
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Randomizing particiipants to Morphine
Randomizing participants to Morphine or Nubain for treatment of Sickle Cell Pain Crisis
Morphine
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Randomization to Nubain
Randomization toNubain or Morphine for the management of Pain Crisis in Sickle Cell patients
Nubain
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Morphine
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Nubain
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 6 years old and \< 19 years old
* Normal baseline chest radiograph
* Normal renal and hepatic function within the previous 12 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Any patient on chronic transfusion Any patient with pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph on admission
* Any patient with DSM diagnosis, excluding those with Attention Deficit Disorder, on or off treatment
* Any patient with documented allergy to either study drug
* Any patient with known evidence of an underlying disease that would interfere with evaluation of a therapeutic response such as:
* Hepatic dysfunction (3x ALT),
* Renal dysfunction (Cr \> 1 children/adolescents, Cr \>2 adults),
* Pulmonary Hypertension (TRJ \>3.0),
* Cardiac dysfunction.
* Any patient with symptoms of an acute stroke.
* Any patient known or suspected to be pregnant.
* Any patient with priapism
* The patient or guardian who will not give consent or assent to be randomized.
6 Years
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute
OTHER
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Saadia Khizer
Iris Buchanan MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-076
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.