Trial Outcomes & Findings for Switch to Unboosted Atazanavir With Tenofovir Study (NCT NCT01351740)

NCT ID: NCT01351740

Last Updated: 2018-07-30

Results Overview

For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

50 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at or before 48 weeks.

Results posted on

2018-07-30

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Switch
switch to unboosted atazanavir 400mg daily with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone atazanavir: switch to unboosted atazanavir 400 mg daily
Continuation
continue on current regimen of atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100mg with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone atazanavir/ritonavir: Continue current regimen of atazanavir 300 mg/ ritonavir 100 mg daily
Overall Study
STARTED
25
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
23
19
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Switch to Unboosted Atazanavir With Tenofovir Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Switch
n=25 Participants
Switch to atazanavir 400 mg daily
Continuation
n=25 Participants
Remain on atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100 mg daily
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
48 years
n=5 Participants
46 years
n=7 Participants
47 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
46 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at or before 48 weeks.

For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Switch
n=25 Participants
Switch to atazanavir 400 mg daily
Continuation
n=25 Participants
Remain on atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100mg daily
Proportions of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure by Randomized Treatment Arm
2 Participants
6 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month (4-8 weeks)

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to determine atazanavir trough plasma level will be performed once on all subjects at 4-8 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Switch
n=24 Participants
Switch to atazanavir 400 mg daily
Continuation
n=12 Participants
Remain on atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100mg daily
Proportions of Subjects in Each Randomized Treatment Arm With Atazanavir Trough Levels Below 150ng/mL
14 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at or before 48 weeks

For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart. Comparison will be made between subjects with 1-month (4-8 week) on-study atazanavir trough levels \<150ng/mL and those with 1-month (4-8 week) on-study atazanavir trough levels \>150ng/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at or before 24 weeks.

For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at or before 24 weeks

For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart. Comparison will be made between subjects with 1-month (4-8 week) on-study atazanavir trough levels \<150ng/mL and those with 1-month (4-8 week) on-study atazanavir trough levels \>150ng/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

Comparison will be made between randomized treatment arms.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

Serious adverse events and discontinuations will be compared between randomized treatment arms

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

Comparison will be made between randomized treatment arms.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

Comparison will be made between randomized treatment arms with respect to changes in fasting lipids and glucose, highly sensitive C-reactive protein \[hsCRP\], and apolipoprotein \[apo\]B, and proportions of subjects developing abnormalities or crossing predefined limits (e.g. NCEP thresholds for lipids)

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 and 48 weeks

Changes in MOS-HIV scores from baseline will be compared between randomized treatment arms.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Switch

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Continuation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Switch
n=25 participants at risk
Switch to atazanavir 400 mg daily
Continuation
n=25 participants at risk
Remain on atazanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg daily
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhea
0.00%
0/25 • 48 weeks
4.0%
1/25 • 48 weeks
Renal and urinary disorders
renal toxicity
0.00%
0/25 • 48 weeks
8.0%
2/25 • 48 weeks

Additional Information

Dr Marianne Harris

British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS

Phone: 1-604-806-8771

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place