Switch to Unboosted Atazanavir With Tenofovir Study

NCT ID: NCT01351740

Last Updated: 2018-07-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A drug-drug interaction between the anti-HIV drugs tenofovir DF (TDF) and atazanavir (ATZ) results in lower ATZ plasma levels when the drugs are given together, particularly in patients not taking ritonavir to boost ATZ levels. Lower plasma drug levels may make the anti-HIV regimen less effective in controlling the HIV virus levels in the blood. For this reason, current treatment guidelines recommend that ATZ always be boosted with ritonavir in regimens also containing TDF. However, withdrawal of ritonavir is often desirable given the tolerability and toxicity issues with this agent, even at the low dose (100 mg daily) used to boost ATZ. For example, ritonavir can cause stomach upset, nausea, diarrhea, high cholesterol levels, and liver enzyme abnormalities.

However, there is evidence that plasma ATZ levels may not predict treatment success on unboosted ATZ regimens, particularly among people whose plasma HIV virus is already under control and unboosted ATZ is being used as a maintenance strategy. In the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program (DTP), nearly 100 patients originally treated with ritonavir-boosted ATZ + TDF (+ FTC or 3TC) are receiving successful maintenance therapy with unboosted ATZ and the same TDF-based backbone.

The study will examine the hypothesis that switching to maintenance therapy with unboosted ATZ 400mg daily will have similar 48-week virologic efficacy to continuing ATZ/ritonavir 300/100mg daily among HIV-infected adults with stable viral load suppression on regimens comprising ATZ/ritonavir 300/100mg daily with TDF plus either FTC or 3TC, despite potentially lower ATZ trough levels with the unboosted regimen. In other words, patients whose HIV viral load is undetectable while receiving TDF (+FTC or 3TC) and ATZ/ritonavir will continue to maintain an undetectable viral load after switching to unboosted ATZ without ritonavir, in the same proportions as those continuing on their boosted ATZ/ritonavir regimen.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Following a screening visit to establish study eligibility, eligible consenting subjects will be randomized 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms (switch to unboosted ATZ or continue ritonavir-boosted ATZ). Randomized open-label treatment will commence following study procedures at baseline. Participants will be assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. On-study evaluations will include assessment of adverse clinical events and medication changes; blood tests for HIV viral load, CD4 cell count, standard safety parameters, fasting lipids and glucose, and pregnancy testing (if applicable); and urine tests for urinalysis and albumin to creatinine ratio. In addition, a serum sample will be stored at each visit for possible future testing. A timed plasma sample for measurement of pre-dose trough ATZ levels will be obtained once per subject at 4-8 weeks. Quality of life will be assessed by completion of the MOS-HIV questionnaire at baseline and every 12 weeks. Adherence will be assessed based on prescription refill data.

In case of protocol-defined virologic failure, a plasma sample for ATZ trough level will be collected, and genotypic resistance testing will be performed on plasma samples with viral load \>250 copies/mL. Subjects with confirmed virologic failure will be asked to come to the clinic and will have their HIV treatment changed to a more effective regimen, selected based on the results of genotypic testing, as soon as possible.

The anticipated rate of confirmed virologic failure in the control arm is no more than 15% over the 48 weeks of the study. Once at least 20 subjects have been assigned to the experimental (switch) treatment arm, if the observed confirmed virologic failure rate in the experimental arm is greater than twice this rate, i.e. \>30%, at any time during the study, the study will be stopped. At this time, subjects in the experimental arm will be reassessed as soon as possible and will resume ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or other effective HIV therapy as appropriate. The failure rate will be reassessed at a minimum after each 20 subjects are enrolled into the experimental (switch) arm.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Switch

switch to unboosted atazanavir 400mg daily with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

atazanavir

Intervention Type DRUG

switch to unboosted atazanavir 400 mg daily

Continuation

continue on current regimen of atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100mg with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atazanavir/ritonavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Continue current regimen of atazanavir 300 mg/ ritonavir 100 mg daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

atazanavir

switch to unboosted atazanavir 400 mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

atazanavir/ritonavir

Continue current regimen of atazanavir 300 mg/ ritonavir 100 mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. HIV infected adults at least 19 years of age
2. Willing and able to provide informed consent to study participation
3. Currently receiving a regimen including atazanavir 300mg/ritonavir 100mg daily with either tenofovir/emtricitabine (FTC) or tenofovir/lamivudine (3TC), for at least 3 months
4. Plasma viral load (VL) \<40 copies/mL for at least 2 consecutive measurements including the screening value, and \< 150 copies/mL continuously for at least 3 months prior to screening
5. Current regimen is first antiretroviral regimen, or if not first regimen, no evidence of resistance to any nucleosides (NRTIs) or protease inhibitors (PIs) on previous resistance tests
6. Any CD4

Exclusion Criteria

1. Clinically significant intolerance or toxicity with current regimen precluding regimen continuation (e.g. intolerance/toxicity to ritonavir necessitating ritonavir discontinuation)
2. pregnancy or breast-feeding
3. antiretroviral regimen including any nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine, efavirenz, or etravirine)
4. antiretroviral regimen including any protease inhibitor other than atazanavir and ritonavir
5. concomitant treatment with proton pump inhibitors, rifampin, St. John's wort, or garlic supplements. (Antacids and H2 receptor antagonists will be allowed provided their dosing is separated from atazanavir administration by at least 2 and 10 hours, respectively).
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marianne Harris, MD

Dr. Marianne Harris

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marianne Harris, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Providence Health Care/ University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Immunodeficiency Clinic, St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harris M, Ganase B, Watson B, Hull MW, Guillemi SA, Zhang W, Saeedi R, Harrigan PR. Efficacy and safety of "unboosting" atazanavir in a randomized controlled trial among HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir DF. HIV Clin Trials. 2017 Jan;18(1):39-47. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1271503. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28067119 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H10-03255

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H10-03255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.