Three Care Models for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture

NCT ID: NCT01350557

Last Updated: 2017-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

299 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hip fracture in the elderly is associated with excess mortality of 5 to 20%, and mobility problems that usually results in costly hospital stays and lengthy rehabilitation procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the costs and effectiveness of three care models- acute/sub-acute, comprehensive, and routine care models for hip fractured elders in Taiwan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hip fracture in the elderly is associated with excess mortality of 5 to 20%, and mobility problems that usually results in costly hospital stays and lengthy rehabilitation procedures. With this increase in the aging population, hip fracture represents a major and a fast growing health care problem in Taiwan. Currently, the incidence rate of hip fractures is 10 times of the incidence rate for the general population. Despite the use of advanced treatment, the one-year mortality rate (15.4%) remains significant, and many of the patients never recover completely in terms of activities of daily living functions. Many studies in the United States have proved that elderly patients with hip fracture can benefit from post-operative rehabilitation, early discharge planning programs, or transitional care programs. However, little is known about what intervention should be attempted for these patients and their families in Taiwan.

The purpose of this study is to compare the costs and effectiveness of three care models- acute/sub-acute, comprehensive, and routine care models for hip fractured elders in Taiwan.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Patients receive only usual hospital care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Subacute care group

Patients receive hospital usual care and subacute care. Subacute care consisted of geriatric consultation, a rehabilitation program, and early discharge planning.

Group Type OTHER

Subacute care

Intervention Type OTHER

Subacute care included geriatric consultation, continuous rehabilitation, and discharge planning.

Comprehensive care group

Patients receive not only the subacute care (geriatric consultation, rehabilitation program, and discharge planning), but also health-maintenance interventions to prevent falls, consult on nutrition, and manage depression.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Comprehensive care

Intervention Type OTHER

Comprehensive care consisted of subacute care plus health-maintenance interventions to manage depressive symptoms, manage malnutrition, and prevent falls.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Comprehensive care

Comprehensive care consisted of subacute care plus health-maintenance interventions to manage depressive symptoms, manage malnutrition, and prevent falls.

Intervention Type OTHER

Subacute care

Subacute care included geriatric consultation, continuous rehabilitation, and discharge planning.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 60 years or older
* Admitted to hospital for an accidental single-side hip fracture
* Receiving hip arthroplasty or internal fixation
* Able to perform full range of motion against gravity and against some or full resistance, and have a pre-fracture Chinese Barthel Index (CBI) score \>70
* Living in northern Taiwan

Exclusion Criteria

* Severely cognitively impaired and completely unable to follow orders (determined by a Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination \[MMSE\] score \<10), or
* Terminally ill
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yea-Ing L Shyu, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chang Gung University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):CD007125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34766330 (View on PubMed)

Tseng MY, Liang J, Shyu YI, Wu CC, Cheng HS, Chen CY, Yang SF. Effects of interventions on trajectories of health-related quality of life among older patients with hip fracture: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 3;17:114. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0958-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26936194 (View on PubMed)

Shyu YI, Liang J, Tseng MY, Li HJ, Wu CC, Cheng HS, Yang CT, Chou SW, Chen CY. Comprehensive care improves health outcomes among elderly Taiwanese patients with hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Feb;68(2):188-97. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls164. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22960477 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HMRPD180015

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NHRI-EX98-9404PI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

'Rehabilitation for Life'
NCT04424186 COMPLETED NA