A Trial Investigating the Effect of Specialised Palliative Care on Symptoms, Survival, Economical Factors and Satisfaction

NCT ID: NCT01348048

Last Updated: 2015-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

306 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Specialised palliative care (SPC) seeks to relieve suffering and improve quality of life in patients with a life threatening disease such as advanced cancer. Many patients with advanced cancer are not in contact with SPC. Previous studies have shown that among advanced cancer patients not referred to SPC there is a significant prevalence of symptoms, problems and needs. The aims of the present study are to investigate whether patients with metastatic cancer, who report palliative needs in a screening, will benefit from being referred to SPC and to investigate the economical consequences of such a referral.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The trial is a randomised, clinical, multicenter trial including 6 Danish SPC-centres. The basic principle is that patients with palliative needs (see inclusion criteria) are identified at oncological departments and randomised to either (i) standard treatment plus SPC (intervention group) or (ii) standard treatment (control group).

Patients will be identified by the following procedure: A) Each week a research nurse reviews the medical records of consecutive patients seen in oncological out-patients clinic. B) Eligible patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire (the screening) that investigates symptoms and problems. The patients are told that their questionnaire will be evaluated and that the research nurse will contact some of the patients later on with information about a RCT. C) Those patients who report at least one palliative need in the questionnaire (see inclusion criteria) and have four additional symptoms are contacted by the research nurse who provide the patients with written and verbal information about the RCT. D) Patients who give informed consent are randomised.

Detailed statistical analysis plan:

Analysis of the primary outcome The primary outcome analysis will be a modified ITT analysis. Patients who withdrew consent after randomisation, who were randomised by mistake and did not fulfil our inclusion criteria, or who were not alive at the time of the follow-ups, will be excluded from the primary analysis. All exclusions will be shown in the CONSORT flow-chart of patient participation.

In the primary outcome analysis we will use multiple imputation for non-responders if there are more than 5% missing outcomes. In total, we will make 20 different data-sets with imputation based on a regression model using predictive-mean-matching using the MI and the MI ANALYSIS procedures in SAS. The primary outcome analysis will be made as a multiple regressions adjusted for the stratification variable if it is normally distributed.

Sensitivity analyses of the primary outcome We will make five sensitivity analyses: 1) a fully adjusted analysis including all relevant covariates, 2) a complete case analysis, 3) an analysis including a model for repeated measurement, 4) a per protocol analysis, 5) an analysis including imputations for those who died.

Analysis of secondary outcomes The analyses of the seven scales from EORTC QLQ-C30 (physical function, role function, emotional function, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, or lack of appetite) will be made using the same principles as described for the primary outcome including the sensitivity analyses. Survival will be analysed using Kaplan-Meier plot. Patients who are alive three months after the end of data-collection will be censured on this date. A Cox regression will be made adjusted for the stratification variable. A sensitivity analysis will be made adjusting for all relevant covariates.

Exploratory outcomes and subgroup analyses For serious adverse events we report the number of hospitalisations, the number of acute hospitalisations and the number of deaths in the eight week trial period. The analyses of the other exploratory outcomes will not be dealt with in detail here. The overall principles regarding questionnaire data (the remaining scales from EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS and FAMCARE-P16) are that they will be analysed as complete case analyses.

Significance levels All tests will be two-tailed. For the primary outcome the risk of type I error is set to 5% (i.e., a significance level of P\<0.05). As we have 8 secondary outcomes, we adjust the significance levels to P\<0.01 to control the familywise (or cumulative) type I error due to multiplicity. The P-values of the exploratory outcomes will be provided, but it will be made clear that the analyses are exploratory.

Register-data, data-management and analyses Survival will be retrieved from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR), and serious adverse events and contacts from The Danish Patient Registry (Landspatientregistret).

Data management will be done by project manager Anna Thit Johnsen. Analyses will be made by statistician Morten Aa. Petersen, who is blinded to the identity of the two intervention groups, which will be denoted Y and X. Results will be presented blinded in the same way for the investigators, and conclusions regarding the results will be drawn by the investigators and written down while the interventions are still blinded. The blinding will not be broken before all analyses of primary and secondary outcomes have been conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Specialised palliative care (SPC) group

Patients continue with their standard treatment (typically they receive treatment in one or more hospitals departments and from their GP). In addition, they are offered a consultation in the SPC out-patient clinic (or at home if the patient cannot attend the hospital) as soon as possible and no more than one week after randomization. If possible, each patient will have at least two contacts to the SPC in the trial period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Specialised palliative care (SPC)

Intervention Type OTHER

The interventions given by the SPC centres follow the the WHO and the EAPC guidelines for palliative care. It is not possible in advance to describe the interventions more specifically as these will be adjusted to each particular patient. As part of the study the medical records of all patients in the intervention group will be reviewed with the purpose of describing the interventions given for the different symptoms and problems.

Standard care group

Patients continue with their standard treatment. They are instructed to contact either their GP or their hospital department if they feel that additional treatment or care is needed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Specialised palliative care (SPC)

The interventions given by the SPC centres follow the the WHO and the EAPC guidelines for palliative care. It is not possible in advance to describe the interventions more specifically as these will be adjusted to each particular patient. As part of the study the medical records of all patients in the intervention group will be reviewed with the purpose of describing the interventions given for the different symptoms and problems.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 18 years
* Live in the area of the participating hospitals
* No contact with specialised palliative care within the previous year
* At least one palliative need defined as a EORTC QLQ-C30 scale score of at least 50% of the score corresponding to maximal symptomatology or maximal functional impairment
* Four additional symptoms (defined as patients answering, on average, at least 'a little' in any of the 14 function or symptom scales in the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire)
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Do not understand Danish well enough to participate in the study
* Are judged incapable of co-operating with the trial protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TRYG Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Danish Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mogens Groenvold

MD, PhD, DMSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mogens Groenvold, MD, PhD, DMSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Palliative Team, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Section of Acute Pain Management and Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Palliative Team Herning

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Palliative Team Fyn, Odense University hospital

Nyborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Palliative Team Vejle

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Johnsen AT, Damkier A, Vejlgaard TB, Lindschou J, Sjogren P, Gluud C, Neergaard MA, Petersen MA, Lundorff LE, Pedersen L, Fayers P, Stromgren AS, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. A randomised, multicentre clinical trial of specialised palliative care plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for cancer patients with palliative care needs: the Danish palliative care trial (DanPaCT) protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Oct 24;12(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-37.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24152880 (View on PubMed)

Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Sjogren P, Pedersen L, Neergaard MA, Vejlgaard TB, Damkier A, Nielsen JB, Stromgren AS, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. Detailed statistical analysis plan for the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT). Trials. 2014 Sep 26;15:376. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-376.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25257804 (View on PubMed)

Skjoedt N, Johnsen AT, Sjogren P, Neergaard MA, Damkier A, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Higginson IJ, Stromgren AS, Groenvold M. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Dec;11(4):444-453. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002043. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32220944 (View on PubMed)

Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Sjogren P, Pedersen L, Neergaard MA, Damkier A, Gluud C, Fayers P, Lindschou J, Stromgren AS, Nielsen JB, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2145-2155. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05021-7. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31410598 (View on PubMed)

Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Damkier A, Neergaard MA, Nielsen JB, Pedersen L, Sjogren P, Stromgren AS, Vejlgaard TB, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Higginson IJ, Johnsen AT. Randomised clinical trial of early specialist palliative care plus standard care versus standard care alone in patients with advanced cancer: The Danish Palliative Care Trial. Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):814-824. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705100. Epub 2017 May 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28494643 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DanPaCT2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.