A Trial Investigating the Effect of Specialised Palliative Care on Symptoms, Survival, Economical Factors and Satisfaction
NCT ID: NCT01348048
Last Updated: 2015-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
306 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Family and Coping Oriented Palliative Homecare Nursing Aimed at Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT01444157
Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT01248624
Early, Integrated, Specialized Palliative Rehabilitation
NCT02332317
Effect of Early Palliative Care on Quality of Life of Patients With Advanced Cancer: a Randomised Controlled Trial.
NCT01865396
The Cancer Home Life Intervention Study. A Randomised, Controlled Multicentre Trial and a Health Economic Evaluation
NCT02356627
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be identified by the following procedure: A) Each week a research nurse reviews the medical records of consecutive patients seen in oncological out-patients clinic. B) Eligible patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire (the screening) that investigates symptoms and problems. The patients are told that their questionnaire will be evaluated and that the research nurse will contact some of the patients later on with information about a RCT. C) Those patients who report at least one palliative need in the questionnaire (see inclusion criteria) and have four additional symptoms are contacted by the research nurse who provide the patients with written and verbal information about the RCT. D) Patients who give informed consent are randomised.
Detailed statistical analysis plan:
Analysis of the primary outcome The primary outcome analysis will be a modified ITT analysis. Patients who withdrew consent after randomisation, who were randomised by mistake and did not fulfil our inclusion criteria, or who were not alive at the time of the follow-ups, will be excluded from the primary analysis. All exclusions will be shown in the CONSORT flow-chart of patient participation.
In the primary outcome analysis we will use multiple imputation for non-responders if there are more than 5% missing outcomes. In total, we will make 20 different data-sets with imputation based on a regression model using predictive-mean-matching using the MI and the MI ANALYSIS procedures in SAS. The primary outcome analysis will be made as a multiple regressions adjusted for the stratification variable if it is normally distributed.
Sensitivity analyses of the primary outcome We will make five sensitivity analyses: 1) a fully adjusted analysis including all relevant covariates, 2) a complete case analysis, 3) an analysis including a model for repeated measurement, 4) a per protocol analysis, 5) an analysis including imputations for those who died.
Analysis of secondary outcomes The analyses of the seven scales from EORTC QLQ-C30 (physical function, role function, emotional function, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, or lack of appetite) will be made using the same principles as described for the primary outcome including the sensitivity analyses. Survival will be analysed using Kaplan-Meier plot. Patients who are alive three months after the end of data-collection will be censured on this date. A Cox regression will be made adjusted for the stratification variable. A sensitivity analysis will be made adjusting for all relevant covariates.
Exploratory outcomes and subgroup analyses For serious adverse events we report the number of hospitalisations, the number of acute hospitalisations and the number of deaths in the eight week trial period. The analyses of the other exploratory outcomes will not be dealt with in detail here. The overall principles regarding questionnaire data (the remaining scales from EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS and FAMCARE-P16) are that they will be analysed as complete case analyses.
Significance levels All tests will be two-tailed. For the primary outcome the risk of type I error is set to 5% (i.e., a significance level of P\<0.05). As we have 8 secondary outcomes, we adjust the significance levels to P\<0.01 to control the familywise (or cumulative) type I error due to multiplicity. The P-values of the exploratory outcomes will be provided, but it will be made clear that the analyses are exploratory.
Register-data, data-management and analyses Survival will be retrieved from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR), and serious adverse events and contacts from The Danish Patient Registry (Landspatientregistret).
Data management will be done by project manager Anna Thit Johnsen. Analyses will be made by statistician Morten Aa. Petersen, who is blinded to the identity of the two intervention groups, which will be denoted Y and X. Results will be presented blinded in the same way for the investigators, and conclusions regarding the results will be drawn by the investigators and written down while the interventions are still blinded. The blinding will not be broken before all analyses of primary and secondary outcomes have been conducted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Specialised palliative care (SPC) group
Patients continue with their standard treatment (typically they receive treatment in one or more hospitals departments and from their GP). In addition, they are offered a consultation in the SPC out-patient clinic (or at home if the patient cannot attend the hospital) as soon as possible and no more than one week after randomization. If possible, each patient will have at least two contacts to the SPC in the trial period.
Specialised palliative care (SPC)
The interventions given by the SPC centres follow the the WHO and the EAPC guidelines for palliative care. It is not possible in advance to describe the interventions more specifically as these will be adjusted to each particular patient. As part of the study the medical records of all patients in the intervention group will be reviewed with the purpose of describing the interventions given for the different symptoms and problems.
Standard care group
Patients continue with their standard treatment. They are instructed to contact either their GP or their hospital department if they feel that additional treatment or care is needed.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Specialised palliative care (SPC)
The interventions given by the SPC centres follow the the WHO and the EAPC guidelines for palliative care. It is not possible in advance to describe the interventions more specifically as these will be adjusted to each particular patient. As part of the study the medical records of all patients in the intervention group will be reviewed with the purpose of describing the interventions given for the different symptoms and problems.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Live in the area of the participating hospitals
* No contact with specialised palliative care within the previous year
* At least one palliative need defined as a EORTC QLQ-C30 scale score of at least 50% of the score corresponding to maximal symptomatology or maximal functional impairment
* Four additional symptoms (defined as patients answering, on average, at least 'a little' in any of the 14 function or symptom scales in the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire)
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Are judged incapable of co-operating with the trial protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TRYG Foundation
OTHER
Danish Cancer Society
OTHER
Bispebjerg Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mogens Groenvold
MD, PhD, DMSc
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mogens Groenvold, MD, PhD, DMSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Palliative Team, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Section of Acute Pain Management and Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Palliative Team Herning
Herning, , Denmark
Palliative Team Fyn, Odense University hospital
Nyborg, , Denmark
Palliative Team Vejle
Vejle, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Johnsen AT, Damkier A, Vejlgaard TB, Lindschou J, Sjogren P, Gluud C, Neergaard MA, Petersen MA, Lundorff LE, Pedersen L, Fayers P, Stromgren AS, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. A randomised, multicentre clinical trial of specialised palliative care plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for cancer patients with palliative care needs: the Danish palliative care trial (DanPaCT) protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Oct 24;12(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-37.
Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Sjogren P, Pedersen L, Neergaard MA, Vejlgaard TB, Damkier A, Nielsen JB, Stromgren AS, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. Detailed statistical analysis plan for the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT). Trials. 2014 Sep 26;15:376. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-376.
Skjoedt N, Johnsen AT, Sjogren P, Neergaard MA, Damkier A, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Higginson IJ, Stromgren AS, Groenvold M. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Dec;11(4):444-453. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002043. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Johnsen AT, Petersen MA, Sjogren P, Pedersen L, Neergaard MA, Damkier A, Gluud C, Fayers P, Lindschou J, Stromgren AS, Nielsen JB, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2145-2155. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05021-7. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Damkier A, Neergaard MA, Nielsen JB, Pedersen L, Sjogren P, Stromgren AS, Vejlgaard TB, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Fayers P, Higginson IJ, Johnsen AT. Randomised clinical trial of early specialist palliative care plus standard care versus standard care alone in patients with advanced cancer: The Danish Palliative Care Trial. Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):814-824. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705100. Epub 2017 May 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DanPaCT2011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.