Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations (NCT NCT01342965)
NCT ID: NCT01342965
Last Updated: 2015-02-24
Results Overview
The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
217 participants
Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)
2015-02-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
110
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
Received Treatment
|
110
|
104
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
109
|
107
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
58
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Other Reasons- Unspecified
|
44
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
9
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
Total
n=217 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37 • n=5 Participants
|
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=7 Participants
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.
The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival
|
11.0 Months
Interval 8.3 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval could not be estimated due to too few events.
|
5.5 Months
Interval 4.2 to 7.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.
A responder was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. A CR was defined as: (1) The disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \< 10 mm. (2) The disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm in the short axis). A PR was defined as: (1) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (2) The persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator
|
68.2 Percentage of responders
|
39.3 Percentage of responders
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.
A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
|
91.8 Percentage of participants
|
82.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants. Only participants who had a complete response or partial response were included in the analysis.
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first documented disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs taking as reference the Baseline SLD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response
|
10.8 Months
Interval 7.0 to 12.6
|
4.2 Months
Interval 2.8 to 5.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 Participants
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=107 Participants
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
28.9 Months
Interval 25.8 to 30.5
|
27.1 Months
Interval 25.4 to 30.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 monthsOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 21 monthsOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Erlotinib
Chemotherapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 participants at risk
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=104 participants at risk
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.7%
3/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.9%
2/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
4/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.9%
3/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.7%
3/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Haemorrhoid infection
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nail bed infection
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.7%
3/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal haemorrhage
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.9%
2/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft tissue injury
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone erosion
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.96%
1/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Haemorrhoid operation
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Erlotinib
n=110 participants at risk
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Chemotherapy
n=104 participants at risk
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.5%
5/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
57.7%
60/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.4%
7/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
53.8%
56/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
44.5%
49/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
8.7%
9/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
18.3%
19/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.9%
3/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
6.4%
7/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
49.0%
51/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
4.5%
5/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
51.0%
53/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
7.3%
8/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
42.3%
44/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
17.3%
18/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
70.9%
78/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
10.6%
11/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
10.0%
11/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.7%
7/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.6%
10/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
9.1%
10/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.9%
2/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
8.2%
9/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
2.7%
3/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
15.4%
16/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
11.8%
13/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.9%
2/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.91%
1/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
13.5%
14/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
10.0%
11/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.9%
3/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
1.8%
2/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.6%
10/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
10.0%
11/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.8%
6/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
12.7%
14/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
28.8%
30/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.7%
7/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
19.2%
20/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
7.3%
8/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.5%
13/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
5.5%
6/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.9%
3/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.4%
7/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
13.5%
14/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.5%
5/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.7%
7/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
17.3%
19/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
8.7%
9/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
15.5%
17/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.3%
8/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.8%
6/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
4.5%
5/110
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
7.7%
8/104
Safety analysis set: All participants who had received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER