A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations

NCT ID: NCT01342965

Last Updated: 2015-02-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 iv on Day 1.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Erlotinib

Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.

Chemotherapy

Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erlotinib

Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy

Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tarceva

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult participants, ≥ 18 years of age.
* Locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.
* Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in tumours.
* Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria.
* European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal receptor (HER) axis (eg, but not limited to erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, or trastuzumab).
* Prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease.
* Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome, or inability to take oral medication, or active gastroduodenal ulcer disease.
* Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye.
* ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy.
* History of any other malignancies within 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
* Brain metastasis or spinal cord compression that has not yet been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated but without evidence of stable disease for at least 2 months.
* Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
* Pregnant, nursing, or lactating women.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Changchun, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Fuzhou, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Nanjing, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shantou, , China

Site Status

Wuhan, , China

Site Status

Xi'an, , China

Site Status

Kampung Baharu Nilai, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kelantan, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Pahang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Petaling Jaya, , Malaysia

Site Status

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, , Malaysia

Site Status

Pulau Pinang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Davao City, , Philippines

Site Status

Desmarinas City, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

San Juan City, , Philippines

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China Malaysia Philippines

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wen F, Zheng H, Zhang P, Hutton D, Li Q. OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e020128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29654023 (View on PubMed)

Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MCL, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y. First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1883-1889. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv270. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26105600 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YO25121

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.