Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Drug Spread in Epidural Space During Caudal Block in Children
NCT ID: NCT01340313
Last Updated: 2013-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
72 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-03-31
2011-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ultrasonography is precise tool to evaluate the spinal structures and can provide estimated information in real time during caudal or epidural block in children.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the drug spread level with a weight-based doses using ultrasonography during caudal block in children and assess the reliability of the real time ultrasonography to determine the drug spread levels. After general anesthesia, the patient will be placed in lateral decubitus position for caudal block. Total 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine will be injected into the caudal space. The spread level will be step-wise evaluated using ultrasonography at the injected drug dose of 0.5 ml/kg, 1.0 ml/kg, 1.25 ml/kg, and 1.5 ml/kg.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Intravenous (IV) Patient Controlled Analgesic (PCA) With Ketorolac or Fentanyl Combined With Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Small Children Undergoing Intravesical Ureteroneocystostomy
NCT01081535
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Early Childhood: Comparison of Surgical Therapy and Surveillance. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multi-Center Study
NCT00444431
Evaluation Of Caudal Epidural Anatomy By Ultrasonography İn Pediatric Patients
NCT03825172
Gastric Ultrasound in Paediatric Anaesthesia
NCT02584348
Posterior Tibial Artery Catheterization
NCT02912481
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
4 times evaluation according to doses in 1 group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consent from one of parents 3. ASA physical status I or II
Exclusion Criteria
* spinal anomaly
* infection focus on back
* allergic reaction to local anesthetics
* foreigner of illiteracy who cannot read consent form
3 Months
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hae Kum Kil, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Severance Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hae Keum Kil
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hong JY, Han SW, Kim WO, Cho JS, Kil HK. A comparison of high volume/low concentration and low volume/high concentration ropivacaine in caudal analgesia for pediatric orchiopexy. Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1073-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b20c52.
Shin SK, Hong JY, Kim WO, Koo BN, Kim JE, Kil HK. Ultrasound evaluation of the sacral area and comparison of sacral interspinous and hiatal approach for caudal block in children. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):1135-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bc6dd4.
Koo BN, Hong JY, Kil HK. Spread of ropivacaine by a weight-based formula in a pediatric caudal block: a fluoroscopic examination. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):562-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02224.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Lundblad M, Lonnqvist PA, Eksborg S, Marhofer P. Segmental distribution of high-volume caudal anesthesia in neonates, infants, and toddlers as assessed by ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Feb;21(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03485.x. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2010-0775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.