Evaluation of 3TC or FTC Mono-therapy Compared to Continuing HAART as a Bridging Strategy

NCT ID: NCT01338025

Last Updated: 2015-11-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) alone vs. continuing a failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in HIV infected children, adolescents and young adults. The study was to see if there were changes in the HIV virus and if there were differences in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the two groups over 28 weeks. Participants were assigned to either take 3TC or FTC alone or continue on his/her current failing HAART regimen. During the first 28 weeks of this study, if the participant was randomized to the continue HAART arm, he/she was not switched to a different or new, potentially suppressive HAART regimen, but continued on the current failing HAART regimen. However, if continuing HAART, the participant might be switched to a new regimen if their provider felt that it was clinically needed or the participant met certain study endpoints (e.g., drop in CD4, increase in viral load).

At the end of 28 weeks, the participant had the choice of remaining on the assigned study group medication(s) or starting a new HAART regimen prescribed by his/her doctor. Then, they would be followed for another 24 weeks to compare the difference in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the different groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, there is no clear consensus for managing virologic failure. Generally, failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based therapy due to non-adherence is associated with high rates of NNRTI resistance, while failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy due to non-adherence carries a much lower risk of PI resistance. In the setting of incomplete adherence and virologic failure despite adherence education, an optimal strategy would be one that effectively bridges the period between the cessation of the failing regimen of highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy and initiation of a new HAART regimen. This would provide time for interventions to improve adherence to be effective while minimizing accumulation of additional drug resistance mutations. Given the compelling need for an effective bridging strategy, the limited evidence for the safety and efficacy of this bridging regimen, and the high level of acceptability of studying 3TC or FTC monotherapy as an effective alternative, P1094 proposed to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing use of 3TC or FTC monotherapy as a short-term bridging regimen vs. continuation of non-suppressive HAART in non-adherent subjects.

This study closed early due to lack of accrual, with only 33 of the target 344 participants enrolled. Therefore analyses, including the analysis of the primary outcome, are descriptive. Only analyses for Step 1 could be done (Step 2 was observational). The following secondary analyses could not be performed:

Changes in Genotypic HIV Drug Resistance From Baseline Changes HIV Replication Capacity \[Time Frame: 28 and 52 weeks\] Changes in CD4 Percent and CD4+ T Cell Count \[Time Frame: 52 weeks\] Changes in HIV-1 RNA Levels \[Time Frame: 52 Weeks\] Changes in Immune Activation \[Time Frame: 28 and 52 Weeks\] Number and Percent of Subjects With Adverse Clinical Outcomes \[Time Frame: 52 Weeks\] Adherence as Measured by 3-day Recall \[Time Frame: 52 Weeks\]

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A, non-suppressive HAART regimen

In Step 1, subjects were randomized to continue their non-suppressive HAART regimen.

In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HAART regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

The study participant continued their non-suppressive HAART regimen as prescribed by their primary provider.

Arm B, 3TC or FTC monotherapy

In step 1, subjects were randomized to receive 3TC or FTC (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider).

In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

3TC or FTC monotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

The study participant was assigned to either 3TC or FTC monotherapy (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HAART regimen

The study participant continued their non-suppressive HAART regimen as prescribed by their primary provider.

Intervention Type DRUG

3TC or FTC monotherapy

The study participant was assigned to either 3TC or FTC monotherapy (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Highly active antiretrovial therapy (HAART) Lamivudine (3TC) emtricitabine (FTC)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 8 to less than 25 years of age, at study entry
* Documentation of HIV-1 infection defined as positive results from two samples collected at different time points
* Treatment experienced patients must have demonstrated failure on the current HAART regimen for 2 months or longer. These patients must have been on ARVs for at least a total of 6 months prior to entry. Thus, if the failing regimen was the first ARV regimen, then the patient must have been on that initial regimen for a minimum of 6 months total.
* CD4+ T cell count greater than or equal to 100 cells/mm3 (confirmed on at least two occasions within 6 months of study entry, including the screening value)
* Documentation of the M184V mutation on genotypic testing at any time prior to study entry
* In the best judgment of the clinical site team, concerns about the subject's ability to adhere made it unsuitable to initiate a new optimal HAART regimen for at least 6 months.
* Subject had not become adherent despite site's adherence interventions
* Female subjects of reproductive potential engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy had to agree to avoid pregnancy during the entire 52 week trial and to consistently and appropriately use at least two of the following contraception methods: condoms, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, IUD, hormonal-based contraception. A list of acceptable methods can be found at the FDA Birth Control Guide (http://www.fda.gov/womens).
* Parent/legal guardian or subject able and willing to provide signed informed consent when applicable


* Met requirements for completion of Step 1
* Subject/guardian agree to continue participation in Step 2
* ViroSeq assay results had been received by site and reviewed by investigator

Exclusion Criteria

* Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or known active hepatitis B infection.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Active malignancy within the past 2 years.
* Current immunosuppressive therapy, including the equivalent of greater than 1 mg/kg/per day or greater than 20 mg total daily dose of prednisone in the 2 weeks preceding screening. Subjects for whom long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy (greater than 2 weeks) was anticipated were excluded. \[Note: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and inhaled, nasal, and topical corticosteroids were not excluded as immunosuppressive therapy.\]
* Prior immunization with an HIV-specific vaccine
* Greater than or equal to 1 CDC class C event within the past 12 months.
* Renal disease (as defined by estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min/1.73m2 confirmed on two occasions within 3 months of screening).
* Active opportunistic infections, including active tuberculosis (TB).
* Current treatment for active systemic TB. If recent, infection must have completed treatment course. INH treatment for latent TB is allowed.
* Viral load greater than 250,000 copies/mL at screening.
* Known greater than or equal than Grade 3 of any of the following laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry: neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelets, AST, ALT, lipase, serum creatinine. Note: Subjects could be re-screened and enrolled if repeat value was less than Grade 3 without signs or symptoms of related organ dysfunction.
* Known greater than or equal to Grade 4 laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry, except with approval of the study team.
* For subjects who were not taking 3TC or FTC at the time of screening: Documented prior intolerance or adverse effect reasonably attributed to 3TC or FTC that resulted in permanent discontinuation.
* Problems with non-adherence attributed to modifiable structural barriers, such as lack of resources (e.g., insurance, transportation).
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

24 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison L. Agwu, MD, Sc.M.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ. of California San Francisco NICHD CRS (5091)

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Children's National Med. Ctr. Washington DC NICHD CRS (5015)

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Florida (5051)

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Univ of Miami Pediatric/Perinatal HIV/AIDS (4201)

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago Children's CRS (4001)

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University NICHD CRS (5092)

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Metropolitan Hospital (5003)

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS (5040)

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Bronx-Lebanon Hospital (6901)

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

DUMC Ped. CRS (4701)

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hospital General de Agudos Buenos Aires Argentina NICHD CRS (5082)

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Hospital Geral De Nova Igaucu Brazil NICHD CRS (5097)

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Insituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas NICHD CRS (5075)

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Univ of Sao Paulo Brazil NICHD CRS (5074)

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

University of Puerto Rico Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research (6601)

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University CRS (8251)

Bangkok, Ratchathewi,, Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai University Pediatrics-Obstetrics CRS (20101)

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Puerto Rico Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Agwu AL, Warshaw MG, McFarland EJ, Siberry GK, Melvin AJ, Wiznia AA, Fairlie L, Boyd S, Harding P, Spiegel HML, Abrams EJ, Carey VJ; P1094 Study Team. Decline in CD4 T lymphocytes with monotherapy bridging strategy for non-adherent adolescents living with HIV infection: Results of the IMPAACT P1094 randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0178075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178075. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28604824 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01AI068632

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IMPAACT P1094

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reducing Antiretroviral Treatments
NCT04051970 UNKNOWN PHASE3