Chlorhexidine Against Sodium Hypochlorite as Skin Antiseptics

NCT ID: NCT01321125

Last Updated: 2013-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The physicians have few options for skin antisepsis. Alternatives for common use antiseptics are costly or ineffective. In order to have more options, this study is needed. The investigators want to know if there are differences between the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol or 10% sodium hypochlorite.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sodium hypochlorite at 10% has been widely used as antiseptic in patients on dialysis as well as for irrigation of wounds and burns. Since it has been used successfully in caring for the exit side of hemodialysis catheters, it is reasonable to propose its use for the insertion and care of central intravascular catheters, as well as for skin preparation before surgery. Alternatives for povidone-iodine, which is the agent most commonly used, are costly or ineffective. In a recent study perform by our group it was demonstrated that 10% sodium hypochlorite was not inferior than povidone-iodine.

It has been demonstrated as well that 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol is superior to povidone-iodine. The aim of this study is to know if 10% sodium hypochlorite has a similar effect that the best current option for skin antisepsis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infectious Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Whole group of 30 volunteers

The arm is composed of 30 human volunteers to test 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), and two controls.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bacterial culture of the prepared skin's areas

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Cultures were taken with a scrub-cup of 5cm2 of internal area pressed over the skin previously prepared, then it was added a 3mL of culture broth (C/E neutralizing broth (D/E Neutralizing Broth, DIFCO TM) containing a neutralizing agent and a detergent agent (1% solution tween-80) as washing solution. The skin was scrub with a sterile rubber policeman for 2 minutes, and the procedure was conducted once again. Both aliquots were gathered together in a sterile tube, and a sample of 50mL was spread in a plate containing a neutralizing agar (D/E neutralizing Agar, DIFCO TM) and incubated at 35°C for 72 hrs. After incubation, the colonies were counted.

Preparing skin's areas to be tested

Intervention Type OTHER

Two antiseptics (2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite) and two controls were tested as skin antiseptics. The intervention consisted of preparing four skin's areas with the antiseptic or the control, two in each arm of the volunteer. These ones were approximately 25cm2 on the forearm for each antiseptic or control. The antiseptic or control were applied in an outward circular motion using a swab that was soaked with the solution. The solution was kept on the skin for 60 seconds before the bacterial culture was conducted. Every volunteer were studied in three separate occasions, alternating the four areas in every subsequent test, so every area was studied with each control or antiseptic.

test group of substantivity

The arm is composed of 10 human volunteers to test 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), and 10% povidone-iodine (Isodine Solucion ®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Promeco, Mexico City)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Antiseptic substantivity

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Three antiseptics will be tested: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, 10% sodium hypochlorite and 10% povidone-iodine, each one will be applied on the surface of one fingertip each, and will be allow to dry for 60 seconds, then the remaining antiseptic on the skin will be wash out with distilled water. The evaluated zones will be dried with sterile gauze, and then will be covered with sterile gauze for two hours. After this period, each finger will be placed for 30 seconds on an agar plate, which will be inoculated whit an ATCC E. coli. The plate will be incubated at 35ºC for 72 hrs. After incubation, a blinded technician will report the presence or absence of bacterial growth

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bacterial culture of the prepared skin's areas

Cultures were taken with a scrub-cup of 5cm2 of internal area pressed over the skin previously prepared, then it was added a 3mL of culture broth (C/E neutralizing broth (D/E Neutralizing Broth, DIFCO TM) containing a neutralizing agent and a detergent agent (1% solution tween-80) as washing solution. The skin was scrub with a sterile rubber policeman for 2 minutes, and the procedure was conducted once again. Both aliquots were gathered together in a sterile tube, and a sample of 50mL was spread in a plate containing a neutralizing agar (D/E neutralizing Agar, DIFCO TM) and incubated at 35°C for 72 hrs. After incubation, the colonies were counted.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Preparing skin's areas to be tested

Two antiseptics (2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite) and two controls were tested as skin antiseptics. The intervention consisted of preparing four skin's areas with the antiseptic or the control, two in each arm of the volunteer. These ones were approximately 25cm2 on the forearm for each antiseptic or control. The antiseptic or control were applied in an outward circular motion using a swab that was soaked with the solution. The solution was kept on the skin for 60 seconds before the bacterial culture was conducted. Every volunteer were studied in three separate occasions, alternating the four areas in every subsequent test, so every area was studied with each control or antiseptic.

Intervention Type OTHER

Antiseptic substantivity

Three antiseptics will be tested: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, 10% sodium hypochlorite and 10% povidone-iodine, each one will be applied on the surface of one fingertip each, and will be allow to dry for 60 seconds, then the remaining antiseptic on the skin will be wash out with distilled water. The evaluated zones will be dried with sterile gauze, and then will be covered with sterile gauze for two hours. After this period, each finger will be placed for 30 seconds on an agar plate, which will be inoculated whit an ATCC E. coli. The plate will be incubated at 35ºC for 72 hrs. After incubation, a blinded technician will report the presence or absence of bacterial growth

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neutralizing agar Neutralizing broth Chloraprep (R) Except (R) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ) hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico) 10% povidone-iodine (Isodine Solucion ®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Promeco, Mexico City) Muller Hinton agar plate (BD/BBL ™, México City, México).

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy adult volunteers

Exclusion Criteria

* History of skin allergies or atopy, as well as reactions to soaps, chlorine or latex
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Antisepsia Central

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad de Guanajuato

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alejandro E. Macias

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alejandro E Macias, M. D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad de Guanajuato

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Guanajuato School of Medicine

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011UGTO372

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.