Effects of Tiotropium on Walking Capacity in Patients With COPD
NCT ID: NCT01307189
Last Updated: 2011-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2010-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A) The acute and long-term (3 weeks) bronchodilator-induced changes in exercise tolerance and in the physiological response during the endurance shuttle walk will be greater with tiotropium compared to placebo in COPD patients.
B) Three weeks of bronchodilation will be associated with increase activity of daily living as evaluated using the London Chest Activity Daily Living scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate the Effects of Tiotropium Bromide on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) During Exercise
NCT00412204
Efficacy and Safety (Including 24-hour Holter Monitoring) of Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules in Patients With COPD
NCT00239460
Effects of Once Daily Tiotropium in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) of Different Severity
NCT00274573
Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Compared to Salmeterol and Placebo in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Bronchitis (COPD)
NCT02173691
Anti-inflammatory Effects of Tiotropium in Patients with Stable COPD
NCT04061161
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to compare the acute bronchodilator-induced changes in exercise tolerance during the endurance shuttle walk between tiotropium and placebo in COPD patients. Also, it will evaluate the physiological response (VE, VO2, VCO2, and heart rate) during the endurance shuttle walk in patients with COPD patients. Finally, it will compare the long-term (3 weeks) bronchodilator-induced changes in exercise tolerance during the endurance shuttle walk between tiotropium and placebo in COPD patients and evaluate the impact of long-term (3 weeks) bronchodilation on activity of daily living evaluated using the London Chest Activity Daily Living scale.
Methods:
This will be a double-blind, randomized and parallel-group study. Due to the long action duration of tiotropium (up to 4 weeks), a cross-over design, as we used in our ipratropium versus placebo study, is not appropriate in the present study. The study will require five visits at the Centre de recherche de l'Hopital Laval. The first visit will include review of the consent form, pulmonary function testing, and a maximal incremental shuttle walk. The following two visits (Visit 2 and 3) will be used to familiarize the participants to the shuttle endurance walking test. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide will be stopped 6 hours prior to these visits while the remaining medication allowed during the study period (see below) will be continued as prescribed. The goal of the familiarization will be to reduce the learning effect that typically occurs when an individual completes the same endurance test several times 3. On visit 4, patients will be randomized to receive one of the two treatments: placebo or tiotropium 18 ug (Spiriva) using the handihaler device. Pulmonary function testing will then be performed and the London Chest Activity Daily Living scale will be administered. Two hours following the inhalation of the first study dose, pulmonary function testing will be repeated and the patients will perform an endurance shuttle walk. They will be provided enough medication for the study duration and discharged. The same procedure as Visit 4 will be completed three weeks later, on visit 5.
Data analysis:
The main outcome will be endurance time at day 21. This variable will be compared between the two treatment arms using an unpaired t-test. The endurance time at day 0 will also be compared between the two treatment arms using the same procedure. The time course of the cardiorespiratory parameters and dyspnea over time will be compared between the two exercise modalities. Comparisons will be done using a repeated measure design (ANOVA). Significance level will be set at a p value of 0.05. The two familiarization endurance shuttle walk tests performed at day -10 and day -5 will be used to evaluate the test-retest variability of this procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tiotropium
Tiotropium
Tiotropium diskus inhalation powder, 18ug, once daily
Placebo
Placebo
Placebo diskus inhalation powder, once daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tiotropium
Tiotropium diskus inhalation powder, 18ug, once daily
Placebo
Placebo diskus inhalation powder, once daily
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boehringer Ingelheim
INDUSTRY
Laval University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laval University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
François Maltais, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre de recherche de l'IUCPQ
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CER1199
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.