Comparison of the Shang Ring With Conventional Surgical Methods
NCT ID: NCT01300910
Last Updated: 2012-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-02-28
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Simplifying the Shang Ring Technique for Circumcision of Men and Boys
NCT02390310
Use of the Shang Ring Circumcision Device in Boys Below 18 Years Old in Kenya
NCT01891409
A Prospective Field Study: Introducing the Shang Ring in Routine Clinical Settings
NCT01567436
Safety and Effectiveness of Different ShangRing Device Sizes for Adult Male Circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia
NCT02242565
The Shang Ring: A Novel Male Circumcision Device for HIV Prevention
NCT00993811
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Population: 400 men (200 at each site), HIV sero-negative men, ages 18-54, living in/around the two clinic sites seeking adult male circumcision
Duration: 2-4 months of recruitment; 60 days follow-up per participant; total expected duration of approximately 6 months in the field
Primary Objectives: (1) Compare the pain and acceptability of the Shang Ring procedure with the forceps guided surgical circumcision technique (Kenya) and the dorsal slit technique (Zambia) (2) Compare the safety and the course of wound healing, including the time to complete healing, between the Shang Ring adult male circumcision procedure and the standard surgical circumcision procedures (forceps guided in Kenya \& dorsal slit in Zambia); (3) Compare the ease of the Shang Ring method versus standard circumcision surgical procedures
Primary Endpoints: (1) To compare the pain \& acceptability of the circumcision methods, we will evaluate the following: post-operative pain; time to return to normal activity; patients' opinions of the Shang Ring and conventional procedures, and satisfaction with cosmetic results.
(2) To compare safety between methodologies, we will clinically compare and evaluate related adverse events and their severity. We will also compare the time to complete wound healing for each method. Complete wound healing is defined as no scab and dry skin by clinical assessment.
(3) We will evaluate the ease of surgery based on the duration of surgery and surgeons' opinions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
One group of men will undergo a circumcision using the Shang Ring and men are to return for regular follow-up visits to evaluate pain and wound healing. . The Shang Ring will be removed at 7 days, and the last scheduled follow-up visit is at 60 days.
Shang Ring
The Shang Ring is a sterile device consisting of two concentric medical grade plastic rings: an inner ring with a silicone band and an outer, hinged ring. The inner ring fits inside the outer ring which will lock when snapped together. The Shang Ring comes in multiple sizes. The appropriate size is determined through use of a measuring strip. To ensure that men cannot remove the device prematurely, the locking mechanism must be broken open using a tool that is similar to a scalpel handle. Then, a pair of special scissors, specifically designed for this purpose, is used to remove the inner ring after healing
2
One group of men will undergo a conventional circumcision using a WHO recommended surgical technique, either the forceps-guided method or the dorsal slit method. Men are to return for regular follow-up visits to evaluate pain and wound healing, with the last scheduled follow-up visit at 60 days.
Male circumcision
A conventional surgical procedure will be performed, per WHO recommendations, involving: drawing a line to mark the amount of foreskin to be cut; cutting off the foreskin; hemostasis; and wound closure with sutures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shang Ring
The Shang Ring is a sterile device consisting of two concentric medical grade plastic rings: an inner ring with a silicone band and an outer, hinged ring. The inner ring fits inside the outer ring which will lock when snapped together. The Shang Ring comes in multiple sizes. The appropriate size is determined through use of a measuring strip. To ensure that men cannot remove the device prematurely, the locking mechanism must be broken open using a tool that is similar to a scalpel handle. Then, a pair of special scissors, specifically designed for this purpose, is used to remove the inner ring after healing
Male circumcision
A conventional surgical procedure will be performed, per WHO recommendations, involving: drawing a line to mark the amount of foreskin to be cut; cutting off the foreskin; hemostasis; and wound closure with sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be uncircumcised (on examination);
* Must be in good general health;
* Must be HIV sero-negative, with documentation of testing no more than one week before the procedure;
* Must be free of genital ulcerations or other visible signs of STI (on examination);
* Must be able to understand study procedures and requirements of study participation;
* Must agree to return to the healthcare facility for the full schedule of follow-up visits after his circumcision;
* Must freely consent to participate in the study and sign a written informed consent form;
* Must have a cell phone or access to a cell phone; and,
* Must agree to provide the study staff with an address, phone number, or other locator information while participating in the research study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Takes a medication that would be a contraindication for elective surgery, such as an anticoagulant or steroid;
* Has known bleeding/clotting disorder (e.g. hemophilia); or
* Has an active genital infection, anatomic abnormality or other condition (e.g. severe obesity, diabetes or sickle cell anemia), which in the opinion of the surgeon, prevents the man from undergoing a circumcision as part of this study;
* Is not currently participating in another biomedical study.
18 Years
54 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EngenderHealth
OTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme
OTHER
Ministry of Medical Services, Kenya
OTHER
University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
OTHER
FHI 360
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Goldstein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Homa Bay District Hospital male circumcision clinic
Homa Bay, Nyanza, Kenya
Society for Family Planning Clinic
Lusaka, , Zambia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10220
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.