Comparison of the Shang Ring With Conventional Surgical Methods

NCT ID: NCT01300910

Last Updated: 2012-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized control trial of 400 adult male circumcision procedures with a one to one ratio between Shang Ring and the in-country standard surgical technique (forceps guided in Kenya and dorsal slit in Zambia).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized control trial of 400 adult male circumcision procedures with a one to one ratio between Shang Ring and the in-country standard surgical technique (forceps guided in Kenya and dorsal slit in Zambia)

Population: 400 men (200 at each site), HIV sero-negative men, ages 18-54, living in/around the two clinic sites seeking adult male circumcision

Duration: 2-4 months of recruitment; 60 days follow-up per participant; total expected duration of approximately 6 months in the field

Primary Objectives: (1) Compare the pain and acceptability of the Shang Ring procedure with the forceps guided surgical circumcision technique (Kenya) and the dorsal slit technique (Zambia) (2) Compare the safety and the course of wound healing, including the time to complete healing, between the Shang Ring adult male circumcision procedure and the standard surgical circumcision procedures (forceps guided in Kenya \& dorsal slit in Zambia); (3) Compare the ease of the Shang Ring method versus standard circumcision surgical procedures

Primary Endpoints: (1) To compare the pain \& acceptability of the circumcision methods, we will evaluate the following: post-operative pain; time to return to normal activity; patients' opinions of the Shang Ring and conventional procedures, and satisfaction with cosmetic results.

(2) To compare safety between methodologies, we will clinically compare and evaluate related adverse events and their severity. We will also compare the time to complete wound healing for each method. Complete wound healing is defined as no scab and dry skin by clinical assessment.

(3) We will evaluate the ease of surgery based on the duration of surgery and surgeons' opinions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Circumcision, Male

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

One group of men will undergo a circumcision using the Shang Ring and men are to return for regular follow-up visits to evaluate pain and wound healing. . The Shang Ring will be removed at 7 days, and the last scheduled follow-up visit is at 60 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shang Ring

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Shang Ring is a sterile device consisting of two concentric medical grade plastic rings: an inner ring with a silicone band and an outer, hinged ring. The inner ring fits inside the outer ring which will lock when snapped together. The Shang Ring comes in multiple sizes. The appropriate size is determined through use of a measuring strip. To ensure that men cannot remove the device prematurely, the locking mechanism must be broken open using a tool that is similar to a scalpel handle. Then, a pair of special scissors, specifically designed for this purpose, is used to remove the inner ring after healing

2

One group of men will undergo a conventional circumcision using a WHO recommended surgical technique, either the forceps-guided method or the dorsal slit method. Men are to return for regular follow-up visits to evaluate pain and wound healing, with the last scheduled follow-up visit at 60 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Male circumcision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A conventional surgical procedure will be performed, per WHO recommendations, involving: drawing a line to mark the amount of foreskin to be cut; cutting off the foreskin; hemostasis; and wound closure with sutures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shang Ring

The Shang Ring is a sterile device consisting of two concentric medical grade plastic rings: an inner ring with a silicone band and an outer, hinged ring. The inner ring fits inside the outer ring which will lock when snapped together. The Shang Ring comes in multiple sizes. The appropriate size is determined through use of a measuring strip. To ensure that men cannot remove the device prematurely, the locking mechanism must be broken open using a tool that is similar to a scalpel handle. Then, a pair of special scissors, specifically designed for this purpose, is used to remove the inner ring after healing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Male circumcision

A conventional surgical procedure will be performed, per WHO recommendations, involving: drawing a line to mark the amount of foreskin to be cut; cutting off the foreskin; hemostasis; and wound closure with sutures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be aged 18 and 54 years;
* Must be uncircumcised (on examination);
* Must be in good general health;
* Must be HIV sero-negative, with documentation of testing no more than one week before the procedure;
* Must be free of genital ulcerations or other visible signs of STI (on examination);
* Must be able to understand study procedures and requirements of study participation;
* Must agree to return to the healthcare facility for the full schedule of follow-up visits after his circumcision;
* Must freely consent to participate in the study and sign a written informed consent form;
* Must have a cell phone or access to a cell phone; and,
* Must agree to provide the study staff with an address, phone number, or other locator information while participating in the research study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Has a known allergy or sensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthesia;
* Takes a medication that would be a contraindication for elective surgery, such as an anticoagulant or steroid;
* Has known bleeding/clotting disorder (e.g. hemophilia); or
* Has an active genital infection, anatomic abnormality or other condition (e.g. severe obesity, diabetes or sickle cell anemia), which in the opinion of the surgeon, prevents the man from undergoing a circumcision as part of this study;
* Is not currently participating in another biomedical study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

54 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EngenderHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ministry of Medical Services, Kenya

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

FHI 360

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc Goldstein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Homa Bay District Hospital male circumcision clinic

Homa Bay, Nyanza, Kenya

Site Status

Society for Family Planning Clinic

Lusaka, , Zambia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Kenya Zambia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33786810 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10220

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.