An Open Label, Blinded Assessor, Trial Comparing Odor Levels Due to Different Hygiene Methods With PrePexTM
NCT ID: NCT02153658
Last Updated: 2014-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
101 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Some men who gone through the PrePex procedure complained of foreskin odor while wearing the PrePex 3-7 days after it is placed. This complaint was identified as potential risk for the PrePex uptake. Researchers from Rwanda assumed there is a possible relation between the level of foreskin odor to the patient foreskin hygiene technique. It was speculated that a patient that follows an appropriate foreskin hygiene technique while wearing the device will have a significantly lower foreskin odor on day 7 than a patient who does not follow such technique. The Government of Rwanda decided to investigate those assumptions in a scientific way and conduct a study to test different hygiene cleaning methods in order to increase the acceptability of PrePex and mitigate the odor concern.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cohort Field Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Device for Non-Surgical Circumcision When Performed by Nurses
NCT01434628
Safety Study of the PrePex Device for Non-Surgical Adult Male Circumcision During Phased in National Implementation in an Effort to Prevent the Spread of HIV
NCT01921608
Comparing the PrePex™ Device to Surgical Circumcision for Rapid Scale Up of Male Circumcision in Resource Limited Setting
NCT01284088
A Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of The PrePex System, a Male Circumcision Device and Methodology for Rapid Scale up of Painless and Bloodless National Circumcision Programs, in Urban and Remote Rural Settings
NCT01150370
Safety and Efficacy Study of Non-Surgical MC Device for Adolescent Male Population Including Contraindicated Subjects
NCT02581722
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) have endorsed innovative approaches to VMMC uptake in settings where HIV prevalence and incidence is high but male circumcision (MC) prevalence remains low in 14 target countries. Recent modelling commissioned by President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and UNAIDS have agreed on an action plan to reach 80% coverage of VMMC in the 14 countries by 2015, this will entail performing roughly 20 million adult VMMC by 2015, averting approximately 3.36 million new HIV infections and saving US$16.5 billion.
The PrePex became the first medical device for adult male circumcision to receive WHO prequalification as an alternative to the conventional surgical circumcision methods already recognized by WHO. The PrePex VMMC procedure is bloodless and requires no injected anesthesia, suturing, or sterile setting, it applies controlled radial elastic pressure to the foreskin between a rigid Inner Ring and an Elastic Ring to cut off distal blood flow. After 7 days, the necrotic foreskin and the device are removed.
The Government of Rwanda was the first country to implement the PrePex and acts as the leading Center of Excellence providing trainings and formal guidelines. As part of the Government's efforts to improve the PrePex implementation, it made efforts to improve the psychology acceptability of the PrePex by men and thus to increase the uptake with VMMC in sub-Saharan Africa.
PrePex researchers from Rwanda have assumed that there is a possible relation between the level of odor from the foreskin to the foreskin hygiene technique. It was speculated that when a patient follows an appropriate foreskin hygiene technique while wearing the device, the odor before device removal (day 7) will be significantly lower than the odor of the foreskin of a subject who follows a less effective foreskin hygiene technique.
Providing scientific evidence of the direct relation between odor and specific foreskin hygiene technique, will allow VMMC implementing bodies to create a comprehensive and effective PrePex related hygiene guidelines and reduce the potential of complaints from men therefore, increasing the acceptability rate. A randomized, controlled, blinded study to assess the effectiveness of 3 different foreskin hygiene techniques was conducted at Rwanda Military Hospital Kigali, Rwanda during November 18th to December 4th, 2013.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Subjects followed the current hygiene instructions, standard washing in a shower with soap.
No interventions assigned to this group
Arm 2
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with soapy water using a syringe once a day.
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with soapy water using a syringe once a day.
Arm 3
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with diluted chlorhexidine (1%) using a syringe once a day.
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with diluted chlorhexidine (1%) using a syringe once a day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with soapy water using a syringe once a day.
Subjects cleaned the foreskin with diluted chlorhexidine (1%) using a syringe once a day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject wants to be circumcised
* Uncircumcised
* Able to understand the study procedures and requirements
* Agrees to participate in one of the arms and to follow hygiene instructions
* Agrees to have Independent blinded smell reviewers in the same room on Removal visit
* Agrees that his partner will be interviewed via telephone
* Agrees to abstain sexual intercourse for 6 weeks post device removal
* Agrees to abstain from masturbation for 2 weeks post device removal
* Agrees to return to the health care facility for follow-up visits (or as instructed) after his circumcision for a period of 1 week
* Subject able to comprehend and freely give informed consent for participation in this study and is considered by the investigator to have good compliance for the study
* Subject agrees to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject with the following diseases/conditions: phimosis, paraphimosis, warts under the prepuce, torn or tight frenulum, narrow prepuce, hypospadias, epispadias
* Known bleeding / coagulation abnormality, uncontrolled diabetes, by questionnaire
* Subject who have an abnormal penile anatomy or any penile diseases
* Subject that to the opinion of the investigator is not a good candidate
* Subject does not agree to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits.
21 Years
49 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, Rwanda
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vincent Mutabazi
Director of the Research Grants Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vincent Mutabazi, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
RBC-Medical Research Centre (MRC)
Jean Paul Bitega, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Military Insurance Medical
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rwanda Military Hospital
Kigali, , Rwanda
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mutabazi V, Bitega JP, Ngeruka LM, Karema C, Binagwaho A. Assessing Odor Level when Using PrePex for HIV Prevention: A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Blinded Assessor Trial to Improve Uptake of Male Circumcision. PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0126664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126664. eCollection 2015.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Biomedical Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Odor Study (RMC-10)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.