Prevention of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

NCT ID: NCT01293799

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

713 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND: Peritonitis remains a significant problem in peritoneal dialysis (PD). It is the leading cause of technique failure, and contributes to mortality. The incidence is highest during the first year of treatment. Non-compliance with the PD protocol is shown to be an important risk factor for peritonitis. Reinforcement of knowledge and ability to perform PD therefore appears to be a possible way to reduce the incidence of peritonitis. This will be studied in The PEritonitis Prevention Study (PEPS).

METHODS: The objective of this randomized, multi-centre investigation, which will include 750 new PD patients who can perform (PD) without assistance, is to evaluate if regular retraining can reduce the incidence of peritonitis, the technique-failure rate, and the hospitalisation days due to peritonitis compared with regular follow-up regimen. Patients in the intervention group will be tested by a PD-technique test and a questionnaire at regular intervals after PD-start and after every peritonitis episode with focus on infection prophylaxis. If needed, they will be retrained. The control group will be treated according to the routine of the center.

The study is ongoing in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom (UK). The study will go on for 6 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND See above.

AIMS The primary aim of this trial is to study if regular follow-up of PD patients with testing of their theoretical and practical knowledge (hereafter called "new type of follow-up") can reduce the time to first peritonitis episode. Secondary aims were to study if the new type of follow-up could reduce the incidence of peritonitis, the technique failure rate related to peritonitis, and the time of hospitalization related to peritonitis compared to a routine regimen. For specific aims, see "Outcome measures" below. A further aim was to study risk factors for peritonitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS The study is a randomized, multi-centre investigation intending to enclose 750 new PD patients in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Inclusion was finished on December 31, 2014. The study will go on until the last included patient has taken part of the study for one year. The study will thus be terminated on December 31, 2015.

The study includes a retraining group and a control group. The intervention in the retraining group consists of regular testing of theoretical and practical knowledge regarding PD with focus on infection prophylaxis including retraining if needed until the test goals are reached. The control group will be treated according to the routines of the center. Peritonitis is defined according to International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (SPD) guidelines (Peritoneal Dialysis International 2005;25:107-131)

The baseline PD training will be the same at all participating centres and follow international recommendations. In addition, fluorescent alcohol and a UV lamp will be used to control the result of hand disinfection in all patients once during the initial PD training. Thereafter this method will only be used in the retraining group..

In the retraining group, the knowledge from the basal training will be tested at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PD start, every sixth month thereafter, and after every episode of peritonitis. Such testing will also be performed at restart of PD and includes two types of tests:

1. The patient will fill in a questionnaire with theoretical and practical questions with focus on infection and infection prophylaxis during PD treatment. Goal: At least 80% of the questions should be correct. If the goal is not reached, further training will be given until the goal is reached.
2. The patient will perform a practical test including hand disinfection, PD exchange technique, and exit-site care. Hand disinfection skills will be controlled with the help of fluorescent alcohol and a UV lamp. Goal: All steps of the practical test should be correctly performed. If not, further training will be given until the goal is reached.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Failure, Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis-associated Peritonitis Dialysis Capd Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A non-commercial, physician-initiated, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial. The participants were randomly assigned to either retraining with testing of their peritoneal dialysis knowledge (the retraining group) or to usual care (the control group).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The retraining group

The intervention in the retraining group consists of regular tests of the patients´ theoretical and practical skills regarding peritoneal dialysis. The test goals should be passed. If not, retraining will be given if needed til the goals are reached. The peritonitis rate in this group will be compared with that of the control group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Retraining

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Testing of the patients´ knowledge and retraining will be given if needed

Control group

Patients randomised to the control group will be treated according to the routines of the clinic.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Retraining

Testing of the patients´ knowledge and retraining will be given if needed

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is able to perform PD without assistance
* Age 18 years old or more

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous PD-treatment less than 2 years ago
* Peritonitis before inclusion
* Active malignancy
* Participation in other studies during the study period which may affect outcome of the present study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset Innlandet HF

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tampere University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tartu University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Susanne Ljungman

professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susanne Ljungman, Prof. emer.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Dnr 590-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PD Catheter Data Collection
NCT07156123 NOT_YET_RECRUITING