Comparison of Two Dose Regimens of Snake Antivenom for the Treatment of Snake Bites Envenoming in Nepal
NCT ID: NCT01284855
Last Updated: 2017-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-04-30
2013-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Safety of Antivenom in People Bitten by Snakes
NCT00270777
Optimal Dose of Antivenom for Daboia Siamensis Envenomings
NCT04210141
Treatment of APAP Toxicity With IV and Oral NAC 2008-2011
NCT01465542
The Treatment of Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Via Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT04934904
Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of Anthrax Immune Globulin Derived From Human Serum
NCT00448253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In Nepal there are gross disparities in the management and outcomes of snake bite envenoming. The country's national guidelines, issued in 2004, prescribe an initial antivenom dose that is 5 times less than the one advocated by most experts. The dosage recommended by the National guidelines is not based on scientific or clinical evidence, and currently, there is confusion about the adequate dose to be administered. Some physicians follow recommendations published by experts, others follow the National guidelines, but for most, dosage is arbitrary. These discrepancies directly impact on morbidity and mortality and lead to wastage of a costly treatment that few can afford.
The principal objective of the study is to establish unequivocally which dosage regimen is the most appropriate for the treatment of snake bite neurotoxic envenoming. It is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing high and low initial doses of snake polyvalent antivenom also known as Anti Snake Venom Serum (ASVS). 250 snake bite victims showing signs of neurotoxic envenoming will be enrolled over 2 years in three health centres of Southern Nepal. Each participant will initially receive either 2 vials or 10 vials of snake polyvalent antivenom. Mortality, the proportion of patients needing assisted respiration, and the percentage of patients who show worsening of neurotoxic signs and therefore require additional doses of antivenom will be compared in both arms. The kinetics of recovery and the total consumption of antivenom will also be compared. Finally, the incidence and severity of early and late adverse reactions to antivenom will be assessed. The economical impact of snake bite envenoming will also be determined by measuring direct and indirect costs to both health services and individual victims. Because they chiefly affect agricultural workers and children, snake bites have serious economic consequences, a fact that is frequently overlooked by national authorities.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low initial dose
This arms corresponds to Nepal national protocol and involves the initial administration of 2 vials of antivenom over one hour followed by the slow infusion of 4 vials over 4 hours
Antivenom
Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.
High initial dose
This arms corresponds to Indian national protocol and involves the initial administration of 10 vials of antivenom over one hour followed by the slow infusion of saline over 4 hours
Antivenom
Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Antivenom
Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 5 years; AND
* Informed consent obtained; AND
* Showing one or more signs of neurotoxic envenoming
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patients presenting more than 24 hours after the bite
* Patients requiring ventilation support at the time of presentation
* Subjects with previous history of snake bite with envenoming
* Patients who already received antivenom before presenting to the study centre
* Patients with pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders
* Subjects with known history of allergy to horse proteins
* Patients with proven viper bites
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CTU
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
CTU
CTU
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanjib Sharma, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
B. P. K. I. H. S.
François Chappuis, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital, Geneva
David Warrell, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Oxford
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bharatpur Hospital
Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal
Charali snake bite treatment centre
Charali, Jhapa, Nepal
Damak red cross center
Damak, Jhapa, Nepal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sharma SK, Alirol E, Ghimire A, Shrestha S, Jha R, Parajuli SB, Shrestha D, Shrestha SJ, Bista A, Warrell D, Kuch U, Chappuis F, Taylor WRJ. Acute Severe Anaphylaxis in Nepali Patients with Neurotoxic Snakebite Envenoming Treated with the VINS Polyvalent Antivenom. J Trop Med. 2019 May 2;2019:2689171. doi: 10.1155/2019/2689171. eCollection 2019.
Alirol E, Sharma SK, Ghimire A, Poncet A, Combescure C, Thapa C, Paudel VP, Adhikary K, Taylor WR, Warrell D, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Dose of antivenom for the treatment of snakebite with neurotoxic envenoming: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 16;11(5):e0005612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005612. eCollection 2017 May.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SNF IZ70Z0 - 131 223
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CER 08-192
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.