Comparison of Two Dose Regimens of Snake Antivenom for the Treatment of Snake Bites Envenoming in Nepal

NCT ID: NCT01284855

Last Updated: 2017-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims at comparing two doses of antivenom in the treatment of snake bite envenoming. It will take place in 3 centers in rural Nepal and will involve 250 snake bite victims presenting with one or more sign of neurotoxic envenoming. The objective of the study is to generate enough scientific evidence to improve Nepal's current national guidelines for the management of snake bites.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Snake bites are considered as one of the major neglected public health issues of tropical areas. They occur chiefly in developing countries and mainly affect poor rural communities. Besides the inadequate supply, distribution and accessibility of antivenom, a major problem is the absence of standardized and adequate treatment protocol. There is a significant diversity in clinical practices, in particular concerning the dose of antivenom given. Additionally, antivenom is often given even in the absence of a clear indication for envenoming. Altogether, this leads to an incredible waste of a scarce and costly resource.

In Nepal there are gross disparities in the management and outcomes of snake bite envenoming. The country's national guidelines, issued in 2004, prescribe an initial antivenom dose that is 5 times less than the one advocated by most experts. The dosage recommended by the National guidelines is not based on scientific or clinical evidence, and currently, there is confusion about the adequate dose to be administered. Some physicians follow recommendations published by experts, others follow the National guidelines, but for most, dosage is arbitrary. These discrepancies directly impact on morbidity and mortality and lead to wastage of a costly treatment that few can afford.

The principal objective of the study is to establish unequivocally which dosage regimen is the most appropriate for the treatment of snake bite neurotoxic envenoming. It is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing high and low initial doses of snake polyvalent antivenom also known as Anti Snake Venom Serum (ASVS). 250 snake bite victims showing signs of neurotoxic envenoming will be enrolled over 2 years in three health centres of Southern Nepal. Each participant will initially receive either 2 vials or 10 vials of snake polyvalent antivenom. Mortality, the proportion of patients needing assisted respiration, and the percentage of patients who show worsening of neurotoxic signs and therefore require additional doses of antivenom will be compared in both arms. The kinetics of recovery and the total consumption of antivenom will also be compared. Finally, the incidence and severity of early and late adverse reactions to antivenom will be assessed. The economical impact of snake bite envenoming will also be determined by measuring direct and indirect costs to both health services and individual victims. Because they chiefly affect agricultural workers and children, snake bites have serious economic consequences, a fact that is frequently overlooked by national authorities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Snake Bite

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low initial dose

This arms corresponds to Nepal national protocol and involves the initial administration of 2 vials of antivenom over one hour followed by the slow infusion of 4 vials over 4 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antivenom

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.

High initial dose

This arms corresponds to Indian national protocol and involves the initial administration of 10 vials of antivenom over one hour followed by the slow infusion of saline over 4 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Antivenom

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Antivenom

Polyvalent antivenom directed against Indian spectacled cobra (N. naja), common Indian krait (B. caeruleus), saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus) and Russell's viper.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VINS Bioproduct

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* History of snake bite; AND
* Age ≥ 5 years; AND
* Informed consent obtained; AND
* Showing one or more signs of neurotoxic envenoming

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject unlikely to co-operate in the study
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patients presenting more than 24 hours after the bite
* Patients requiring ventilation support at the time of presentation
* Subjects with previous history of snake bite with envenoming
* Patients who already received antivenom before presenting to the study centre
* Patients with pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders
* Subjects with known history of allergy to horse proteins
* Patients with proven viper bites
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CTU

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CTU

CTU

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sanjib Sharma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

B. P. K. I. H. S.

François Chappuis, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Geneva

David Warrell, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Oxford

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bharatpur Hospital

Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal

Site Status

Charali snake bite treatment centre

Charali, Jhapa, Nepal

Site Status

Damak red cross center

Damak, Jhapa, Nepal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Nepal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharma SK, Alirol E, Ghimire A, Shrestha S, Jha R, Parajuli SB, Shrestha D, Shrestha SJ, Bista A, Warrell D, Kuch U, Chappuis F, Taylor WRJ. Acute Severe Anaphylaxis in Nepali Patients with Neurotoxic Snakebite Envenoming Treated with the VINS Polyvalent Antivenom. J Trop Med. 2019 May 2;2019:2689171. doi: 10.1155/2019/2689171. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31205473 (View on PubMed)

Alirol E, Sharma SK, Ghimire A, Poncet A, Combescure C, Thapa C, Paudel VP, Adhikary K, Taylor WR, Warrell D, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Dose of antivenom for the treatment of snakebite with neurotoxic envenoming: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 16;11(5):e0005612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005612. eCollection 2017 May.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28510574 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNF IZ70Z0 - 131 223

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CER 08-192

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Paravertebral Nerve Blocks in Neonates
NCT03408340 TERMINATED PHASE4
Pre-hospital Nebulized Ketamine for Pain
NCT04162028 WITHDRAWN PHASE4
Leptospirosis Care Bundle Study
NCT05425524 RECRUITING NA