Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety And Efficacy Study Of Once Daily Controlled Release Pregabalin In The Treatment Of Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia (NCT NCT01270828)
NCT ID: NCT01270828
Last Updated: 2021-01-28
Results Overview
Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) is defined as \<30% pain response relative to the single blind phase baseline or patient discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or adverse events in the double blind phase of the study. For the calculation of \<30% pain response relative to baseline, baseline will be defined as the mean of the last 7 observations prior to the start of SB treatment, which will be compared with the 7 days rolling average of pain response in DB phase. Participants may be discontinued due to lack of efficacy in this study at the discretion of the study physician.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
806 participants
13 Weeks
2021-01-28
Participant Flow
A total of 129 centers in 17 countries screened subjects for the study, including 68 in the US, 6 in Bulgaria, 6 in Poland, 6 in Russia, 6 in the Ukraine, 5 in India, 5 in South Africa, 5 in Sweden, 4 in Slovakia, 3 in Colombia, 3 in Croatia, 3 in Germany, 2 in Denmark, 2 in Hong Kong, 2 in Serbia, 2 in Taiwan, and 1 in the Czech Republic.
The study consisted of 4 phases: Baseline (1 week \[wk\]): to determine study entry criteria; Single Blind (SB) (6 wks): to determine optimized dose; Double Blind (DB) (13 wks): responders with at least 50% improvement in pain at SB were considered and randomized to pregabalin or matching placebo; and DB taper phase (1 wk).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pregabalin Controlled Release (CR) DB
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
806
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
660
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
146
|
|
Double Blind Phase
STARTED
|
208
|
205
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
COMPLETED
|
182
|
160
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
45
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pregabalin Controlled Release (CR) DB
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Reason Unspecified
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Enrolled but not treated
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Related adverse event
|
0
|
0
|
46
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
32
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
29
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Unrelated AE
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
|
Pregabalin CR SB
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Death
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Protocol and GCP non-compliance
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Reason Unspecified
|
7
|
4
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
15
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
11
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Adverse event not related to study drug
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Phase
Adverse event related to study drug
|
5
|
7
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety And Efficacy Study Of Once Daily Controlled Release Pregabalin In The Treatment Of Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Total
n=413 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-44 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45-64 years
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
199 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
157 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 13 WeeksPopulation: The full analysis set (FAS) was the primary efficacy analysis set and consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) is defined as \<30% pain response relative to the single blind phase baseline or patient discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or adverse events in the double blind phase of the study. For the calculation of \<30% pain response relative to baseline, baseline will be defined as the mean of the last 7 observations prior to the start of SB treatment, which will be compared with the 7 days rolling average of pain response in DB phase. Participants may be discontinued due to lack of efficacy in this study at the discretion of the study physician.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Loss of Therapeutic Response.
|
29 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 13 WeeksPopulation: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase
A secondary LTR endpoint (S-LTR) was defined as the 5 day rolling average pain score during DB, compared to the 5 day randomization baseline pain score. As a secondary endpoint, S-LTR was defined as: 1. At least a 30% increase in the 5 days rolling average pain score during DB relative to the 5 Day randomization baseline pain score 2. A 5 days rolling average pain score ≥4. Participants who discontinue due to lack of efficacy or adverse events in the DB phase of the study will also be counted as an LTR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Participants With Secondary LTR Based on 5 Day Rolling Average Diary Results
|
49 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 13 WeeksPopulation: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The 30% pain responders were defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the mean pain score from SB baseline to DB endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=206 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=204 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in the Mean Pain Score.
|
95.6 Percentage of participants
|
83.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 13 WeeksPopulation: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The 50% pain responders were defined as participants with at least a 50% reduction in the mean pain score from SB baseline to DB endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=206 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=204 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Mean Pain Score.
|
88.3 Percentage of participants
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SB Baseline (Enrollment) to Week 19 and DB Baseline (Week 6) to Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The pain numeric rating scale (NRS Pain) consists of an 11 point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=206 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Weekly Mean Pain Score.
SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-4.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-3.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Weekly Mean Pain Score.
DB Baseline to Week 19
|
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
0.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SB Baseline (Enrollment) to Week 19 and DB Baseline (Week 6) to Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The pain numeric rating scale (NRS Pain) consists of an 11 point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain. Participants were asked to rate their pain over the past week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Weekly NRS-Pain (1-Week Recall).
DB Baseline to Week 19
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
—
|
|
Change in the Weekly NRS-Pain (1-Week Recall).
SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SB Baseline (BL) (Enrollment) to Week 19 and DB Baseline (Week 6) to Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase. N in the below table refers to number of participants analyzed: 203 in Pregabalin DB CR group and 195 in Placebo DB group, unless otherwise specified.
The MOS-SS is a validated self administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. The scale has been found reliable and valid with good overall measurement properties. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) as well as a 9 item overall sleep problems index assessing sleep over the past week. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep Problems Index I-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-19.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
-16.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep Problems Index I-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
SleepProblems Index II-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-21.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.07
|
-17.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.11
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
SleepProblems Index II-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,194)
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep Disturbance-SB BL to wk 19
|
-28.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-21.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep Disturbance-DB BL to wk 19
|
-1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
|
7.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Snoring-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,194)
|
-3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
-4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.64
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Snoring-DB BL to wk 19(N=201,194)
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.46
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Awaken short of breath/headache-SB BL to wk 19
|
-11.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
|
-10.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.26
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Awaken short of breath/headache-DB BL to wk 19
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep adequacy-SB BL to wk 19
|
19.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.83
|
17.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.90
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Sleep adequacy-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.82
|
-6.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.89
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Somnolence-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-12.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
-12.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
—
|
|
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS).
Somnolence-DB BL to wk 19(N=203,194)
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SB Baseline (BL) (Enrollment) to Week 19 and DB Baseline (Week 6) to Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The MOS-SS is a validated self administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. The scale has been found reliable and valid with good overall measurement properties. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) as well as a 9 item overall sleep problems index assessing sleep over the past week. The item "Quantity of sleep" of MOS-SS is presented here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=192 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the MOS-SS-Quantity of Sleep.
Quantity of sleep-SB BL to wk 19(N=203,192)
|
0.9 Hours
Standard Error 0.09
|
0.7 Hours
Standard Error 0.10
|
—
|
|
Change in the MOS-SS-Quantity of Sleep.
Quantity of sleep-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,192)
|
-0.1 Hours
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.4 Hours
Standard Error 0.09
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6 and Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The MOS-SS is a validated self administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. The scale has been found reliable and valid with good overall measurement properties. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) as well as a 9 item overall sleep problems index assessing sleep over the past week. The optimal sleep score is a dichotomous 'Yes' or 'No' rating, where 'Yes' indicates optimal sleep (average 7-8 hours per night) and 'No' indicates not optimal sleep. The "percentage of participants with optimal sleep" is presented here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The MOS-SS-Optimal Sleep.
Week 6 (N=208,205)
|
58.7 Percentage of participants
0.09
|
62.4 Percentage of participants
0.10
|
—
|
|
The MOS-SS-Optimal Sleep.
Week 19 (N=204,197)
|
54.9 Percentage of participants
0.08
|
54.8 Percentage of participants
0.09
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that has been used in chronic pain and fibromyalgia studies to rate change in a patient's overall status. This single item instrument uses a 7 point Likert scale, anchored by (1) very much improved, to (7) very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Minimally improved
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
19.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Very much improved
|
31.5 Percentage of participants
|
23.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Much improved
|
36.9 Percentage of participants
|
30.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
No change
|
10.3 Percentage of participants
|
12.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Minimally worse
|
2.5 Percentage of participants
|
7.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Much worse
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
|
7.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Very much worse
|
0.5 Percentage of participants
|
0.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase. N in the below table refers to number of participants analyzed: 203 in Pregabalin DB CR group and 195 in Placebo DB group, unless otherwise specified.
The SF 36 is a self administered, validated questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health aspects: Physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception over the past week. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) where, higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
General Health Perception-SB BL to wk19(N=202,195)
|
11.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
8.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
General Health Perception-DB BL to wk19(N=202,195)
|
1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
-4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Vitality-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
13.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
10.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Vitality-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
|
-6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Social Functioning-SB BL to wk 19
|
18.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
|
15.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Social Functioning-DB BL to wk 19
|
-2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Role-Emotional-SB BL to wk 19
|
15.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
11.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.47
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Role-Emotional-DB BL to wk 19
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.47
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Health-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
11.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
9.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Health-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
-3.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Component-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
7.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
5.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Component-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
-2.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Component-SB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
6.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
5.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Component-DB BL to wk 19(N=202,195)
|
-1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
-2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical functioning-SB BL to wk 19
|
11.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.44
|
8.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.49
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical functioning-DB BL to wk 19
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
-4.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Role-Physical-SB BL to wk 19
|
18.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.62
|
13.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.67
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Role-Physical-DB BL to wk 19
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.54
|
-7.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.60
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Bodily pain-SB BL to wk 19
|
31.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.51
|
23.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.56
|
—
|
|
Change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Bodily pain-DB BL to wk 19
|
1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
-6.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The pain related sleep interference item rating scale is scored on an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS Sleep). It is self administered by the subject in order to rate how pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain)). Participants are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number on the numeric rating scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=206 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=204 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Daily Sleep Interference Scores
SB Baseline to Week 19 (N=205,203)
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
—
|
|
Change in Mean Daily Sleep Interference Scores
DB Baseline to Week 19 (N=206,204)
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The HADS is a self administered questionnaire that was designed to screen for the presence of a mood disorder in medically ill patients. To distinguish psychiatric presentations from physical illness, the items focus on subjective disturbance of mood rather than physical signs. The HADS contains 14 items rated on 4 point Likert type scales. Two subscales assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale consists of 7 statements, rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = No anxiety or depression, to 3 = Severe feelings of anxiety or depression). Separate scores are calculated for each subscale ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores denote greater severity of depression or anxiety
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)
HADS-Anxiety-SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-1.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
—
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)
HADS-Anxiety-DB Baseline to Week 19
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
—
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)
HADS-Depression-SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-1.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
—
|
|
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)
HADS-Depression-DB Baseline to Week 19
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The BPI sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI sf consists of 5 questions. Questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure pain on an 11 point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible). Question 5 consists of 7 item subsets which measure the level of interference of pain on daily functions on an 11 point scale from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=203 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=195 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-sf)
Pain Severity Index-SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-18.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
-13.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
—
|
|
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-sf)
Pain Severity Index-DB Baseline to Week 19
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
—
|
|
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-sf)
Pain Interference Index-SB Baseline to Week 19
|
-21.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.71
|
-17.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.74
|
—
|
|
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-sf)
Pain Interference Index-DB Baseline to Week 19
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 19Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
The BSW is administered by the study physician or designated site personnel and consists of three single item measures designed to capture the patient's perception of the effect of treatment in terms of the relative benefit, their satisfaction, and their intention or willingness to continue on therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=201 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=193 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Benefit From Treatment, Satisfaction With Treatment and Willingness to Continue Treatement (BSW)
Benefit from treatment
|
98.5 Percentage of participants
|
93.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Benefit From Treatment, Satisfaction With Treatment and Willingness to Continue Treatement (BSW)
Satisfaction with treatment
|
96.0 Percentage of participants
|
90.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Benefit From Treatment, Satisfaction With Treatment and Willingness to Continue Treatement (BSW)
Willingness to continue treatment
|
87.6 Percentage of participants
|
81.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 20Population: The SB Analysis Set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis.
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: Results in death; Is life-threatening (immediate risk of death); Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); or Results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The study physician used the adjective "severe" to those AEs that interfere significantly with participant's usual function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
n=801 Participants
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Participants with AEs
|
80 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
441 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Participants with Serious AEs
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Participants with Severe AEs
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 6, 11, 15, 19 and 20Population: The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB phase.
Percentage of participants with suicidal behavior/ideation were noted as Baseline, Weeks 6, 11, 15, 19 and 20.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 Participants
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 Participants
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
SB BL(N=208,205)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
Week 6 (N=208,205)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
Week 11 (N=194,178)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
Week 15 (N=183,167)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
Week 19 (N=204,197)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Behaviour/Ideation
Week 20 (N=199,194)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Pregabalin CR DB
Placebo DB
Pregabalin CR SB
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 participants at risk
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
n=801 participants at risk
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia of chronic disease
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.49%
1/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.49%
1/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.49%
1/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal mass
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Social circumstances
Sexual abuse
|
0.00%
0/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.12%
1/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pregabalin CR DB
n=208 participants at risk
Possible doses for participants with normal creatinine clearance (CLcr) (≥60 mL/min) during the DB fixed dose phase were pregabalin CR 165 mg/day, 330 mg/day, 495 mg/day CR or 660 mg/day CR. Doses for participants with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) were pregabalin 82.5 mg/day, 165 mg/day, 247.5 mg/day, or 330 mg/day CR.
|
Placebo DB
n=205 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo
|
Pregabalin CR SB
n=801 participants at risk
The participants with normal CLcr (≥60 mL/min) were treated with pregabalin 165 mg/day CR; those with low CLcr (\>30 - \<60 mL/min) received 82.5 mg/day pregabalin CR. Subsequently, the pregabalin doses were increased based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
3.4%
7/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.49%
1/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
17.1%
137/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.48%
1/208 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
0.00%
0/205 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
11.4%
91/801 • Baseline to Week 20
The SB analysis set (SBAS) consisted of all participants who were enrolled into the SB phase of the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication; The FAS consisted of all participants randomized to the DB phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the DB phase. Both SBAS and FAS were included in this analysis
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER