Effect of Oseltamivir on Cognitive Function in Subjects With Influenza

NCT ID: NCT01249833

Last Updated: 2017-03-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study has been designed to determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in attention / working memory / processing speed / mood as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone. The cognitive tests employed are objective measures developed and administered online by HeadMinder Inc.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objective:

To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in attention as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.

Secondary Objectives:

To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in working memory and processing speed as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.

Supportive Objectives:

1. To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in self-rated alertness as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
2. To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in self-rated calmness and contentment as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
3. To determine if there is a correlation between the rate of improvement in symptom scores and the rate of change in attention and working memory.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Open Label

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oseltamivir

Added to standard of care for influenza

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days

Standard of care alone

Standard of care for influenza

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oseltamivir

Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tamiflu

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult men and women, 18 - 65 years of age (inclusive)
2. Indicative symptoms/signs of uncomplicated acute illness due to influenza infection (A or B strains) that started within a maximum of 2 days prior to Visit 1 as per the Tamiflu® Canadian product label. Signs and symptoms may include the following:

* Fever
* Respiratory symptoms (cough, coryza, sore throat, rhinitis)
* Constitutional symptoms (headache, malaise, myalgia, sweats and/or chills, fatigue)
3. Positive rapid antigen test for influenza (A or B strains) at Visit 1
4. Negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 for women of childbearing potential; women of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use a suitable form of contraception during the study. Acceptable birth control measures include: hysterectomy, birth control pills, tubal ligation, intrauterine device, hormonal injections and implants, double barrier methods (such as a condom with a diaphragm or a condom with spermicide), and abstinence. Oral contraceptives must be in stable use for 2 or more cycles prior to screening. Intrauterine device (IUD) must be in use at least 30 days prior to study drug administration. Barrier methods must be in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration.
5. Subjects must:

* have daily access to a computer at home with: internet access (preferably high-speed for optimal performance but dial-up can be used as well); Microsoft operating system; Internet Explorer browser capability and an e-mail account. A Macintosh (Mac) computer cannot be used.
* be capable of and willing to complete the required online assessments in English according to the protocol schedule
* be willing to abstain from the use of an antiviral medication if they are randomised to the standard of care treatment arm
* have provided written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

1. More than 2 days since the onset of influenza symptoms
2. Subjects who, in the Investigator's judgment, require treatment with an antiviral medication as per the Canadian "Clinical Recommendations for Patients Presenting with Respiratory Symptoms During the 2009 - 2010 Influenza Season" (see Appendix D)
3. Clinical suspicion of infection with a respiratory virus other than influenza
4. Any medical condition that is sufficiently severe or unstable such that the subject is considered to be at imminent risk of requiring hospitalisation
5. History of conditions that may potentially affect cognitive function during the study, such as underlying neurologic conditions, depression or depressive disorders (unless the condition and treatment have been stable for 3 months), seasonal affective disorder (SAD), or any other cognitive impairment or dementia
6. Intermittent use of sedative-hypnotics; subjects who have been taking a fixed dose of a sedative-hypnotic every day for a period of at least 30 days may be included provided that they continue the same regimen throughout the study.
7. Intermittent or chronic use of psychiatric medications (with the exception of antidepressants that have been stable for 3 months) or anti-epileptic drugs
8. Nursing home residents
9. Known allergy to oseltamivir phosphate or any of the inactive ingredients of Tamiflu®
10. Women who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or who are lactating
11. Current alcohol or drug abuse or substance dependence
12. Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug within the last 30 days
13. Patients vaccinated for influenza within 6 months of study enrollment
14. In the Investigator's judgment, the subject will not be able to adhere to the protocol requirements or is not suitable for study participation for any reason
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Trial Management Group Inc.

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. O'Mahony, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Collette

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Lai

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Topsail Road Medical Clinic

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Moran Medical Centre

Collingwood, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Kanani

Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Herman

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Milestone Research

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

SKDS Research Inc

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Family First Medical Centre

Orléans, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Steeple Hill Medical Centre

Pickering, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Martyn Chilvers - London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Michael O'Mahony - London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

DCTM Clinical Trials Group Ltd.

Strathroy, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Gupta

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Devonshire Clinical Research Inc.

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Regina Medical Centre

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAI-001-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Severe Influenza A Infection
NCT02108366 COMPLETED PHASE3