A Study of Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) for Treatment of Influenza With a Focus on (H1N1) 2009 Flu Strain

NCT ID: NCT01032837

Last Updated: 2012-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blind, multi-center study of Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) will evaluate the efficacy against viral activity, the effectiveness in resolving the disease symptoms, and the safety and tolerability in patients with influenza. Patients with (H1N1) 2009 influenza strain or influenza A are eligible for this study. Patients will be randomized to one of four treatment regimens. Patients will receive oral doses of either 75 mg (adults) or 150 mg (adults) of study drug twice daily for 5 or 10 consecutive days. The dose will be body weight-adjusted for pediatric patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oseltamivir standard dose 5 days

Adults and children 13 years and older received 75 mg oseltamivir and a placebo capsule twice daily for 5 days. Children aged 1 - 12 years received a weight-based dose (from 30 to 75 mg) oseltamivir suspension and placebo suspension orally twice daily for 5 days. Participants received matching placebo for the second 5 days of treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir capsules for participants ≥ 13 years.

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Pediatric suspension for participants aged ≤ 12 years.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo provided as capsules and as a suspension.

Oseltamivir standard dose 10 days

Adults and children 13 years and older received 75 mg oseltamivir and a placebo capsule twice daily for 10 days. Children aged 1 - 12 years received a weight-based dose (from 30 to 75 mg) oseltamivir suspension and placebo suspension orally twice daily for 10 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir capsules for participants ≥ 13 years.

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Pediatric suspension for participants aged ≤ 12 years.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo provided as capsules and as a suspension.

Oseltamivir high dose 5 days

Adults and children 13 years and older received 150 mg (2 x 75 mg) oseltamivir capsules twice daily for 5 days. Children aged 1 - 12 years received a weight-based dose (from 60 to 150 mg) oseltamivir suspension orally twice daily for 5 days. Participants received matching placebo for the second 5 days of treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir capsules for participants ≥ 13 years.

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Pediatric suspension for participants aged ≤ 12 years.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo provided as capsules and as a suspension.

Oseltamivir high dose 10 days

Adults and children 13 years and older received 150 mg (2 x 75 mg) oseltamivir capsules twice daily for 10 days. Children aged 1- 12 years received a weight-based dose (from 60 to 150 mg) oseltamivir suspension orally twice daily for 10 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir capsules for participants ≥ 13 years.

Oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

Pediatric suspension for participants aged ≤ 12 years.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo provided as capsules and as a suspension.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oseltamivir

Oseltamivir capsules for participants ≥ 13 years.

Intervention Type DRUG

Oseltamivir

Pediatric suspension for participants aged ≤ 12 years.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo provided as capsules and as a suspension.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tamiflu Tamiflu

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pediatric, adolescent and adult patients \>/=1 year of age
* Fever \>/=37.8 degrees C or at least one respiratory symptom (cough, coryza, sore throat, or rhinitis)
* Positive rapid diagnostic test for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus or influenza A in the 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug
* \</=96 hours between onset of influenza-like illness and first dose of oseltamivir

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently receiving any form of renal replacement therapy including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or hemofiltration
* History of chronic renal failure or clinical suspicion of renal failure at baseline
* Clinical evidence of hepatic compensation at the time of randomization
* Known HIV infection
* Vaccination with live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in the two weeks prior to first dose of study medication
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Lomita, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Bardstown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Madisonville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Mandeville, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Meltairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveprt, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Stevensville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bridgeton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Freemont, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Sicklerville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Camillus, New York, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morganton, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Canal Fulton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Scotland, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Upland, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Magna, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Saratoga Springs, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Vienna, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NV22155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id