The Effects of Two Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Paradigms
NCT ID: NCT01244594
Last Updated: 2014-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at risk for many health conditions, some of which can be decreased with exercise. Cycling with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is one way to obtain exercise after SCI. However, cycling with FES has only been done one way, which involves pedaling more quickly with less force to work against. Pedaling more slowly would allow the person to work against more force, which may lead to greater improvements in bone mineral density and muscle size. It may also lead to greater changes in bone make-up, body fat, and cholesterol levels. All of these improvements may lead to a decrease in bone fractures and cardiovascular disease, two major medical issues that exist in the SCI population. Study Aims: This study will compare the outcomes on bone, muscle and cardiovascular health between the commonly used method of pedaling more quickly to a new method of pedaling more slowly. Both groups will work against the maximal force possible. It is expected that the group pedaling more slowly will work against greater force and thus will have improved outcomes compared to other group pedaling faster. Methods: Twenty people with SCI, ages 18-65 years, will be randomly assigned to a treatment group and will participate in three 60-minute sessions per week for 6 months at an outpatient rehabilitation center. All subjects must have complete paralysis of both legs, but may have sensation preserved. Before and after 6 months of exercise, subjects will have an MRI scan to assess muscle size and bone, a dexascan to assess bone, a strength test using electrical stimulation to assess muscle force, an analysis of fat free body tissue, and lab work to measure cholesterol, bone factors that provide insight into bone change, and nutritional status. Relevance: If the protocol of pedaling more slowly results in greater improvements, this technique can be applied to clinical practice. Some people with SCI have FES cycles in their homes and many have been cycling for many years. This new technique may allow them to obtain more benefits than what they currently are receiving from FES cycling. In addition, it is important to maintain overall bone, muscle and cardiovascular health so that people with SCI are health and ready when spinal cord regeneration becomes clinically available.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycling for Children With Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
NCT00245726
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paired With FES Cycling Post SCI
NCT05975606
Early FES Cycling in Acute Spinal Cord Injury for Neuromuscular Preservation and Neurorecovery
NCT05255679
Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling in SCI
NCT04064385
Functional Electrical Stimulation During Cycling in People With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03834324
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High cadence, low resistance
Subjects in this arm will cycle with functional electrical stimulation at a higher cadence (speed) and a lower resistance.
Cycling with functional electrical stimulation
Subjects will cycle with functional electrical stimulation for one hour, 3 times per week at Magee Rehab's outpatient center. Subjects will cycle for a total of 26 weeks (6 months).
Low cadence, high resistance
Subjects in this arm will cycle with functional electrical stimulation at a lower cadence (speed) and a higher resistance.
Cycling with functional electrical stimulation
Subjects will cycle with functional electrical stimulation for one hour, 3 times per week at Magee Rehab's outpatient center. Subjects will cycle for a total of 26 weeks (6 months).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cycling with functional electrical stimulation
Subjects will cycle with functional electrical stimulation for one hour, 3 times per week at Magee Rehab's outpatient center. Subjects will cycle for a total of 26 weeks (6 months).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) levels A (motor and sensory complete) or B (motor complete)
* Intact lower motor neurons to the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal muscles
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of conditions that require chronic steroids
* Symptomatic or known cardiac disease
* Pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance
* Ventilator dependency
* Implanted devices that may be adversely affected by the FES system
* Lower extremity fragility fractures in the previous 3 months
* Severe spasticity in legs
* Presence of a Grade 2 or higher pressure ulcer
* Severely limited range of joint motion
* Heterotopic ossification of joints in the lower extremities
* Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
* Dislocation of one or both hips
* Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant during the study
* Post menopausal, if female
* Current seizure disorder
* Participation in activities involving electrical stimulation or activity based therapy within the past 3 months
* Participation in a neuroregenerative intervention within the past 12 months
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
OTHER
Magee Rehabilitation Hospital
UNKNOWN
Temple University
OTHER
University of Delaware
OTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Therese E Johnston, PT, PhD, MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Magee Rehabilitation Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Johnston TE, Marino RJ, Oleson CV, Schmidt-Read M, Leiby BE, Sendecki J, Singh H, Modlesky CM. Musculoskeletal Effects of 2 Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Paradigms Conducted at Different Cadences for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9):1413-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
164600
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.