Randomized Study of ON 01910.Na in Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients With Excess Blasts
NCT ID: NCT01241500
Last Updated: 2020-06-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
299 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2018-10-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of 72-Hour Infusion of ON 01910.Na in Patients With MDS or AML
NCT00854945
Efficacy and Safety of 5-day Dosing of ON 01910.Na in Intermediate-1,-2, or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT00867061
Efficacy and Safety of ON 01910.Na in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients With Trisomy 8 or Classified as Intermediate-1, -2 or High Risk
NCT00906334
Phase II Cont. IV of ON 01910.Na in MDS w/ Trisomy 8/Intermed-1, 2/High Risk
NCT00987584
Leukemia SPORE Phase II DAC Study for R/R and Elderly Acute AML and MDS
NCT02190695
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Best Supportive Care (BSC) + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr administered as a 72-hr continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 2-week cycle (N = approximately 180 patients)
* BSC (N = approximately 90 patients).
Patients will be stratified at entry by bone marrow (BM) blasts (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). After completing the first eight 2-week cycles (i.e., after 16 weeks of treatment), the frequency of further 72-hr CIV infusions will be decreased to an administration on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle.
Patients will remain treated on study until 2006 International Working Group (IWG) progression criteria are met (i.e., 50% increase of BM blasts or worsening of cytopenias) or until death from any cause, whichever comes first.
Patients who progress to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) while on study should be offered either standard treatment for AML or enrollment in an appropriate investigational study if they are eligible. These treatments with their start and end dates should be documented and patient survival time will be documented for all randomized patients.
Cross-over of BSC patients to ON 01910.Na after progression will not be allowed. However, patients in the BSC-only group will be allowed, as medically justified, access to low-dose cytarabine 20 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SC) once daily for the first consecutive 14 days of each 28-day cycle, up to 4 cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Low-dose cytarabine will be delayed as needed until recovery of blood counts. All study participants will be allowed, as medically justified, access to RBC and platelet transfusions and to growth factors (erythropoietin, Filgrastim \[G-CSF\]). Hydroxyurea will be allowed to manage blastic crisis with hyperleukocytosis when patients transition to leukemia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC)
Patients will receive ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards and best supportive care (BSC).
ON 01910.Na
The dose of ON 01910.Na will be 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards. Infusion bags must be changed every 24 hours and a new infusion bag must be used for each of the subsequent 24 hours until completion of the total 72-hour infusion time.
Best supportive care (BSC)
Patients will receive best supportive care (BSC).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ON 01910.Na
The dose of ON 01910.Na will be 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards. Infusion bags must be changed every 24 hours and a new infusion bag must be used for each of the subsequent 24 hours until completion of the total 72-hour infusion time.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MDS classified as follows, according to WHO and FAB classification:
* RAEB-1 (5% - 9% BM blasts)
* RAEB-2 (10% - 19% BM blasts)
* CMML (10% - 20% BM blasts) and WBC \< 13,000/μL
* RAEB-t (20% - 30% BM blasts), with following criteria:
* o WBC \< 25 x 10E9/L at entry
* o Stable WBC at least 4 weeks prior to entry and not requiring intervention for WBC control with hydroxyurea, chemotherapy, or leukopheresis.
* At least one cytopenia (ANC \< 1800/µL or platelet count \< 100,000/µL or hemoglobin \<10 g/dL)
* Progression according to 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria any time after start of azacitidine or decitabine during past 2 years; or failure to achieve complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG) after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or relapse after initial complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG criteria) observed after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or, intolerance to azacitidine or decitabine defined by drug-related ≥Grade 3 liver or renal toxicity leading to discontinuation during the past 2 years.
* Did not respond to, relapsed after, not eligible for, or opted not to do bone marrow transplantation
* Off other MDS treatments for at least 4 weeks; Filgrastim (G-CSF) and erythropoietin allowed before and during the study as clinically indicated.
* No need for induction chemotherapy
* ECOG status 0, 1 or 2
* Willing to adhere to protocol prohibitions and restrictions
* Patient (or a legally authorized representative) must sign informed consent form to indicate patient's understanding study's purpose and procedures and willingness to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Any active malignancy within the past year, except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia
* Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy
* Total bilirubin ≥1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
* Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL
* Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of \<130 mEq/L)
* Pregnant or lactating females
* Patients unwilling to follow strict contraception requirements (including condom use for males with sexual partners, and for females: prescription oral contraceptives \[birth control pills\], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm\], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study
* Females with reproductive potential who do not have a negative urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test at screening
* Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start
* Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg)
* New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to first dose of ON 01910.Na) or poorly controlled seizures
* Any other concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy
* Prior treatment with low-dose cytarabine during past 2 years Investigational therapy within 4 weeks of starting ON 01910.Na
* Psychiatric illness or social situation that limits the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
OTHER
Traws Pharma, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven M. Fruchtman, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Traws Pharma, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, United States
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Integrated Community Oncology Network
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Innovative Medical Research of South Florida, Inc.
Miami, Florida, United States
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Centers
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Woodlands Medical Specialists
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Martin Memorial Cancer Center
Stuart, Florida, United States
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
North Shore Medical Center
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Edward H. Kaplan MD & Associates
Skokie, Illinois, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Westwood, Kansas, United States
Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Providence Cancer Center
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Overlook Hospital
Summit, New Jersey, United States
North Shore - LIJ Health System
Lake Success, New York, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Bon Secours St. Francois Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
H. Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw
Roeselare, West-vlaanderen, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen
Antwerp, , Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, , Belgium
CHU de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, , Belgium
CHU Angers Service de Medecine D - Maladies du Sang
Angers, , France
CHU Avignon Centre Hospitalier Henri Dufaut
Avignon, , France
Hôpital Avicenne Hématologie Clinique
Bobigny, , France
CHU Caen Hématologie Clinique
Caen, , France
CHU Estaing Service d'hématologie
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU Lille Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, , France
CHU Limoges Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, , France
Institute Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Hôpital de L'archet I
Nice, , France
Hôtel Dieu Sce Hématologie Clinique
Paris, , France
Hôpital Saint-Antoine
Paris, , France
CHU Perpignan Centre Hospitalier Hôpital Saint-Jean
Perpignan, , France
CRLCC Henri Becquerel
Rouen, , France
Chu-Strasbourg-Hopital Civil
Strasbourg, , France
Hôpital Purpan
Toulouse, , France
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Universitätsklinikum zu Köln
Cologne, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Dresden
Dresden, , Germany
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim, , Germany
Johannes-Wesling-Klinikum Minden
Minden, , Germany
Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
München, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte
Siena, SI, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Alessandria, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologa Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitairia Vittorio Emanuele-Ferrarotto-Santo Bambino
Catania, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi di Firenze
Florence, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
Genova, , Italy
Azienda Osperdaliera Universitaria Maggiore della Carità
Novara, , Italy
Università degli Studi La Sapienza
Roma, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista di Torino
Torino, , Italy
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Princesa
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seetharam M, Fan AC, Tran M, Xu L, Renschler JP, Felsher DW, Sridhar K, Wilhelm F, Greenberg PL. Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
Athuluri-Divakar SK, Vasquez-Del Carpio R, Dutta K, Baker SJ, Cosenza SC, Basu I, Gupta YK, Reddy MV, Ueno L, Hart JR, Vogt PK, Mulholland D, Guha C, Aggarwal AK, Reddy EP. A Small Molecule RAS-Mimetic Disrupts RAS Association with Effector Proteins to Block Signaling. Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):643-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.045.
Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P, Al-Kali A, Baer MR, Sekeres MA, Roboz GJ, Gaidano G, Scott BL, Greenberg P, Platzbecker U, Steensma DP, Kambhampati S, Kreuzer KA, Godley LA, Atallah E, Collins R Jr, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Wilhelm FE, Azarnia N, Silverman LR; ONTIME study investigators. Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
Navada SC, Silverman LR. The safety and efficacy of rigosertib in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Aug;16(8):805-10. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1209413. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Al-Kali A. Relationship of bone marrow blast (BMBL) response to overall survival (OS) in a multicenter study of rigosertib (Rigo) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts progressing on or after treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35:15_suppl, 7056-7056 ASCO 2017
Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
The Myelodysplastic Syndromes Foundation
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.