Direct Antibiotic Delivery of Cefazolin Into Soft Tissue Infections Using Subcutaneous Injection and Ultrasonic Dispersion
NCT ID: NCT01238276
Last Updated: 2018-10-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NO_LONGER_AVAILABLE
EXPANDED_ACCESS
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Unlike traditional delivery methods, Direct Antibiotic Delivery does not rely on blood supply and is beneficial for subjects with Diabetes or subjects who have received radiation therapy and blood supply is limited.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase 2 Randomized Study to Compare Ultrasonic Drug Delivery to Standard of Care for the Treatment of Infections in Non-Healing Wounds
NCT03732365
Antibiotic Tumescent For Chronic Wounds
NCT06327113
"Ultrasound-Enhanced Propolis Therapy for Healing Diabetic Foot Wounds"
NCT07099482
Investigating Ultrasound Debridement in Wound Care
NCT03516422
Safety and Efficacy of Low Intensity Shockwave Therapy in Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02691234
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous to this study, cefazolin was considered to be ineffective in treating Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as it had only been tested at the concentrations that were attainable by traditional methods. Through our study and laboratory tests conducted at the Harford Hospital, Connecticut, we have confirmed that cefazolin can be effective against even the most resistant strains of MRSA if a high enough concentration is obtained.
Under this study, treatment is only available to subjects that have already undergone standard therapy, but were not able to resolve the infection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cefazolin
Cefazolin is approved for clinical use for some bacterial infections. The standard routes of administration are Intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV). For this study, the route of administration will be delivered using the Silberg TPS, which delivers the cefazolin by subcutaneous injection followed by external ultrasonic dispersion. The concentration delivered is one gram/100 ml saline. Cefazolin can safely be given IM at the much higher concentration of 1 gram/2.5 ml of saline. The maximum dose that may be administered is 3 grams in 300 ml, which is within the approved guidelines of a daily dose. The concentration of antibiotic will be the same; only the dose may vary depending on the size of the wound or area of induration. Each subject will receive only one treatment in this study.
Silberg Tissue Preparation System
The TPS is FDA cleared for the subcutaneous infusion and ultrasonic dispersion of tumescent fluid excluding the parenteral delivery of drugs. Under this study, the TPS is a device to deliver cefazolin by subcutaneous injection followed by external ultrasonic dispersion. The TPS consists of a medical grade peristaltic pump that is used to infuse antibiotic solution using a sterile blunt-tipped infusion cannula into a superficial subcutaneous plane. After the cannula has been removed, high frequency external ultrasound is delivered transcutaneously over the area of infusion in order to disperse the antibiotic solution. The power density is within the range allowed for physical therapy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Wounds must demonstrate the presence of skin and skin structure infection, which may be demonstrated by one or more of the following: Culture results as aforementioned, swelling of the tissues, discoloration, open wounds, and/or drainage, which may or may not be associated with pain and/or tenderness.
* Confirmed presence of soft tissue cellulitis caused by bacteria for which cefazolin is likely to have activity to inhibit the bacteria will be evidenced by microbiologic cultures taken no greater than ten (10) days prior to treatment.
* Subject must have previously been treated by a qualified licensed physician using traditional surgical and/or medical treatments, which may include courses of IV antibiotics, but where Subject was unable to resolve their infection through traditional surgical and/or medical treatments for soft tissue cellulitis caused by bacteria for which cefazolin is likely to have activity to inhibit the bacteria at a maximum concentration of 1 gram per 100 ml saline, as demonstrated by the presence of induration, redness, open wounds, and/or soft tissue swelling.
* Subject must be referred by his or her treating physician to the Wound Care Center of the investigational hospital.
* The Wound Care Center of the investigational hospital has confirmed that standard therapies have failed to cure the subject's infection and the infection is still present.
* Subjects are not on concomitant antibacterial drugs since these drugs have failed to treat the subject's infection.
* Subject may be male or female and must be at least 18 years of age.
* Subject must sign informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are allergic to cefazolin.
* Subjects who have a serious allergy to penicillin.
* Subjects with infections that involve body cavities.
* Subjects designated to be vulnerable, i.e., pregnant women, subjects under the age of 18, and subjects who need to have consent provided by a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR).
* Subjects who are unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol.
* Subjects who have a history of clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease, including congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of 3.
* Subjects who have any other life-threatening illness or organ system dysfunction, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would either compromise subject safety or interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the test drug.
* Subjects who cannot understand English.
* Subjects who have received a treatment under this study are not eligible for re-admittance for thirty (30) days from the date of their last treatment.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sonescence, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Barry N Silberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sonoma West Medical Center, Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, Sutter Health
James K Gude, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sonoma West Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sonoma West Medical Center
Sebastopol, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Weninger KR, Camara CG, Putterman SJ. Observation of bubble dynamics within luminescent cavitation clouds: Sonoluminescence at the nano-scale. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Jan;63(1 Pt 2):016310. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.016310. Epub 2000 Dec 27.
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA. Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's diabetic foot infection classification system. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 15;44(4):562-5. doi: 10.1086/511036. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
Frisoli Junior A, de Paula AP, Feldman D, Nasri F. Subcutaneous hydration by hypodermoclysis. A practical and low cost treatment for elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2000 Apr;16(4):313-9. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200016040-00007.
Champoux N, Du Souich P, Ravaoarinoro M, Phaneuf D, Latour J, Cusson JR. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and tobramycin administered by hypodermoclysis in young and older healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Sep;42(3):325-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03967.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IND 75,736
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.